im not racist my friends r black :D

i'm not using this to flame sinatraa, more saying it definitely wasn't a fluke win (i'm from EU btw) as tenz was probs one of, if not the best player at the time. also i don't think they fluked out of t1, they didn't get any form of coaching staff and continued to play a ridiculously loose style, their failure to adapt to the new scene led to them being knocked out.

i'm not talking about pedophilia as in a legal concept, i'm talking about it as in a moral concept, which are independent of laws which i keep talking about.

Riot's rulebook prohibits swearing etc out of game, why can't it have a stance on pedophilia of players? arguably a much more signifant issue.

are you stupid? i literally said it's nothing to do with a crime - it's Riot's decision to blacklist someone. they can blacklist someone regardless of what they have done.

a law doesn't define what is right and wrong, a law defines what you can and can't do. brazilian law isn't the definition of right and wrong and doesn't intend to be. sure, he was within the law but as i literally just said in my last reply that doesn't mean he wasn't in the wrong.

i'm going to spell it out very clearly so you can understand: MORALLY Riot should do something (blacklist) irrelevant of any LEGAL (for law!) conditions because PEOPLE (not governments) agree that pedophilia is morally wrong.

well obviously not now but he was at the time...?

but a crime doesn't make something wrong lmao, a crime is BECAUSE something is wrong. cheating on someone is morally wrong, but it isn't a crime lol. you've ignored me again - stop conflating the two. everyone agrees pedophilia is wrong, so Riot CAN punish him for it because he has done something morally wrong...?

okay, and why can't pedophilia be against Riot's rulebook?

you keep saying 'sadly, in brazil etc.' but this has nothing to do with the law. this has to do with Riot's DECISION.

what precedents would this open...? this is literally the slippery slope fallacy lmao. how is not punishing people for non-morally wrong crimes not 'serious'? lmao what no they won't? Riot isn't a brazilian company. cheating isn't against Brazilian law but riot would have no problem banning him for that lmao. if they followed this relative to country's laws we'd be here all day.

you're conflating a crime with something with negative moral worth, otherwise known as a sin. why should brazilian law being faulty affect Riot's decision on this?

well Riot can punish anything they find morally wrong

im referring to pancc not NTK

okay but what does brazil's domestic laws have to do with a company's stance on paedopilia?

well block him from pro-play lol, idk, have a stance on it, condemn it, i'm not here to weigh up his actions however if something THIS morally wrong has been done then i think its importance riot take a no-nonsense stance.

whats it got to do with brazilian laws? Riot isnt a Brazilian company rofl and Brazilian laws don't have any moral worth in the same way that any other countries laws have no intrinsic moral worth. your argument is circular, laws are morally good because....? they are laws? why are they laws? if you think something is wrong and you can argue it is, and I would say paedophilia is definitely wrong, by definition tbqh.

what does riot being a private company have to do with this? the OP is saying that something should be done, not something must be done. i wouldn't call the crime 'heinous' but its very bad if not worse than any hate (i think you mean) crime.

well there's no definitive list of VPN IPs so its unlikely for that to work rly well and for anyone with dynamic IP it doesn't make any diff anyway

monka doesn't even know the difference between wifi and internet but we're the uneducated ones

wesh ma gueule

both comps were meta...? and what does their map pick have to do with it... you can have any comp you like on any map doesn't matter whether it's your pick or not lmao. Liquid just really failed to read the fast rotates of EDG even when they had skye ulti to show them.

i enjoy this game

as someone on rly low sens it's a lot nicer

jajajaja

but he was the best at the time...?

didn't mojj 1 deagle nats through a cypher cage on map 1?

how does single elim make it 'mickey mouse'. 'completely new meta' ???

georgian easy.

? you can be rivals without spreading rumours and lies about people

circular definition

i am straight because i am straight

good logic bro

katie hopkins (:

who r u

i mean you all fanboy our humour and our music

lol i have nooooo idea

hmm

i love his mannerisms hes actually so cute whaaaa

no i heard the news but only that which would seem to victimise him

what did he do to make himself a cuck?

respect increased))))

as a fnc fan they def do not have the better aim lol, they won the match because of strategy for the most part

he's literally proved you wrong using your own braindead logic LMAO

yea the aim "skill ceiling" is lower, that's done on purpose. the point is in valorant is to have a higher utility skill ceiling than CS in creating different strategies involving combinations. its almost as if you don't actually understand the point of either game. some pros are more comfortable with heavy util based play and some are more comfortable with basic/dry more map control centered play which often involves a lot more aim.

you comparing skill in two games is like me asking who is better between a lawyer and a doctor rofl, it literally makes no sense.

i care 🙂

modelo zzzz

yeah thats exactly what i wrote, good response.

yeah its not as if he's literally the author of their strategy, you talk about a "reliable IGL" then proceed to talk about minor mistakes and fragging capabilities.... you realise that "choke" was because they'd already fought them? rematches are always harder.

that actually is a thing, its called a Pain au saucisse

ok? they have to post something first, what's wrong with this?

so being socially liberal makes your game unpopular? lmao?

how has this censored others wat

how is posting this going 'broke'

so you are anti-gay then? why not just come out and say it? you complain about self-censorship but you seem to be the only one doing it.

normal meaning someone who respects the sexualities of others and their representations. you'd be banned for being racist, it's nothing to do with agreeing, it's just expressing the anti-gay sentiments that you keep alluding to. you can think whatever you want.

because geopolitics is the fault of the citizens of kazhakstan

gotta b a glitch

If Liquid stick together they will on top of the EMEA scene simply because of all the switch ups elsewhere and who knows perhaps their IGLing will improve.

Well I mean you can keep saying that but many analysts come from backgrounds such as these. I mean that has happened quite a lot, especially in the beginning valorant pros haven't really played insanely "smart", obviously that's improved but its nowhere near the same. What makes pros pros is usually their insane mechanics, quick thinking and gamesense rather than actually being intellectual.

This just isn't true. Most of OPTIC's losses are pretty easy to explain. Ascent yesterday was a prime example and a map they consistently make stupid mistakes on. Their executes, ideas, and often midrounding is impeccable, which is why they often win, not because Victor got a kill after getting onto a site LMAO. They lost Ascent yesterday due to some stupid plays (yes some by Victor) but frankly the calls were a lil off, FNS randomly peeking heaven post plant 12-11, 4v2 was really quite upsetting and this kept happening. All in all this has nothing to do with Victor and I think you need to stop listening to Tenz so much and think for yourself.