PepeLaugh bronzil

its losing to fucking apex rn as well LMAOOOOO

what's wrong with him typing copium if it's true?
edit: was supposed to be a reply to @TInglyPiano but got posted here... wtf vlr?

you not realizing this guy is a massive troll made my iq drop

-chupappiwardell, renowned tsm fanboy

vlr community in a nutshell

i will never understand why people think arguing against acend fans with acend literally in their usernames is a good idea. no one knows who the best player in the world is right now. if it's between tenz and cned, we'll just have to wait and see when they play against each other.

so having a loud personality means you're trying to be like xqc? what?

same. sina was so fun to watch. it's a shame he had to do some stupid shit.

true but I guess you could say all three of us are based, so idrk. that's how I feel too, though.

yeah. I've recently found myself trying to find other teams to root for just because some sen fans are so cancerous and I don't wanna be associated with them.

you embarrass na valorant fans. please shut the fuck up

what a match. i can't stop saying how excited i am for xset and i really hope they make berlin. just unfortunate that they had to go up against the #ZOMBSNATION EZ Clap baby

rip dude, i was rooting for ya

cool. if u decide to watch it, stick with it. it starts off slow and confusing but picks up and by the end, everything is explained. enjoy!

depends on what you like, but my personal favorites are steins;gate and code geass. hunter x hunter is good too but if I say that's my favorite I'll get called a tenz stan.

*has TL flair

astralis would obv win but this is probably the most pointless thread ive ever seen

he got paranoia'd at the end

xset is fucking insane. looking forward to them playing in berlin for sure!

100Throws

i would say both of u are equally sped

im a bandwagoner just because I like a team thats good? ok

I think you should stop criticizing them because they lost a game and use that time to work on your english instead. please dont reply, I am on heavy amounts of copium right now

looks whos talking...

xset is fucking good, wow. would love to see them in berlin, ngl.

no way! an actual good take on vlr!

whole na cs scene = a couple of shitty cs pros who came to val and ended up being good. ok lol

true

5/10 bait, got some people, although the majority were able to see through it.

you're taking an example from one match and parading around with it like it proves me completely wrong. also, I'm not sure where you're getting that info from, everywhere I've checked so far, fnatic was the favorite. again, done talking to you, go back to the psych ward.

agreed. attacker spawn feels so closed off from the rest of the map. tbh I feel like in my games no one ever bothers rotating thru there. its always tps or ct. such a useless design.

card capsules are such a good idea. i want the sovereign card so much dude. edit: but i do think bp rewards shouldn't be included. bundle cards are fine, but not bp ones.

I'm done arguing with you, you're a waste of my time. I've now learned that arguing with someone with a superiority complex as massive as yours is completely pointless, since you just think everything you say is not only right but also unthinkably smart. hands down the most annoying and sad person I've met on the internet in a long time. the fact that you even decided to come back here to check if I'd said anything more just for the sake of calling me delusional is even more pathetic than anything I've ever done in my entire life. it's like you're looking for people to argue with. to be honest, neither of us are really right here; people probably use a mix of both betting and statistics. go ahead with the "oh now you're changing your argument again" shit. twist it whichever way you want. but either we're both equally wrong or we're both equally right at this point.

as a side note, anyone can say, "objectively, I'm right." anyone can take a "source" and twist what it says whichever way they want. these things mean nothing, and yet they were what composed 75% of your arguments. and you still think you're right. either way, let's just stop replying to each other before more people see this and figure we're a bunch of braindead manchildren. I'm already embarrassed enough as is. say what you want, I'm done here.

fnatic was the favorite. i guess you don't watch esports either. if you want my pick'em to prove that I favored fnatic, I can gladly send it over.

stupid peek but also stupid thread. they're called pros for a reason, so people like us really don't have much room to criticize them.

i wouldn't say that

sez u

https://www.vlr.gg/pickem/0b999dd1 i feel like i might be overestimating guild based on other peoples pickems, but heres mine nonetheless

it's favorite players, not best players dude.

a zombsnation flair would go too hard. also yeah agreed with the original suggestion, having two flairs would be really cool.

he probably has the words 'factual, objective, subjective' in a separate tab and just copy + pastes them. they make up about 50% of his essays, so I wouldn't worry too much.

yeah, i had some pretty braindead points as well as the other guy. sorry for putting y'all through that.

okay :) believe what you want boss. doesnt change the fact that you're fuckin wrong

there's no reason to be annoyed anymore, I already said we should stop and I think you should agree with me on that. let's just agree to disagree and go our separate ways. again, have a good night!

"a competitor judged most likely to win"

please tell me, who exactly does this judging? is it the scoreboard? no, it's people. people judge who will win. you inadvertently just proved MY argument right. this is the point where I call you a stupid asshole, but I won't, since I'm a decent person and understand that because we disagree on something, doesn't make you any of those things.

there isn't even a point in arguing with you. i haven't got a single braincell left to lose after reading that. someone please take over from here. have a good day/night, dude.

you're structuring your argument like you're about to submit it to your fifth grade teacher. even your mindless insults calling me a dumbass and stating my lack of intelligence (when I haven't said a thing about YOU as a person to begin with!) sound like something an 11yo would come up with. the fact that you even need to use personal insults to get your point across signifies how weak it is.

AND FOR THE LAST TIME: i'd also like to again restate the definition of a "favorite", since that's not something you responded to. a favorite is the team most favored to win, meaning, the team the most people think will win. it doesn't have to be based off of stats at all, although the decisions of people betting normally will be. this is why betting is reliable.

^^ you have yet to explain to me ever so elegantly and intellectually how being a favorite entails being statistically better than another team. favorite. means. you're. favored. by. the. majority.

huh? i'm not conjuring up another couple hundred words to reply to what you've written, but I will say this: the reason I changed your example is because it makes no sense. no team is the best at every single thing, and no team is the worst at every single thing. as for your counterargument to my second point, I have nothing to say. it's pointless arguing over who looks up teams' records and who looks at betting odds because both of us can't be swayed. in my personal experience, though, people don't base who they think is winning a matchup based off of a team's history vs. other teams. lastly, the reason we aren't challenging your "logic" is because there's no logic to challenge. you don't seem to have the slightest clue what you're talking about, and this entire argument has just been you restating the same two things in different ways and somehow creating multiple entire essays out of it.
edit: i'd also like to again restate the definition of a "favorite", since that's not something you responded to. a favorite is the team most favored to win, meaning, the team the most people think will win. it doesn't have to be based off of stats at all, although the decisions of people betting normally will be. this is why betting is reliable.

say team A is very strong in one aspect but very weak in another. now, say team B is decent in the aspect team A excels in and is very strong is the aspect team A is very weak in. so, despite team A having a better record, team B might still be the favorite. that's why you look at betting odds. because they focus on the specific matchup between two teams, instead of previous records. ALSO, being the "favorite" literally means that more people favor a certain team to win. it does not mean that one team is statistically better than the other, although that does obviously play a role into who the favorite is.

also, i'd like to say that looking at the bettings odds is something that ACTUAL people do. if your friend asks you who the favorite was in a game, you look at the betting odds. the fact that you don't seem to know this leads me to believe that you've never watched an actual sports game in your life (also backed up by the fact that you replied to me with an entire paragraph like 2 minutes after I had posted my original comment).

lastly, please stop writing 'factual' every other sentence. it just makes you look stupid. and sorry for being a paragraph peter.
edit: grammar

actually, in real sports when you want to find out who the favorite is in a matchup, you look at the betting odds. I would say they're a perfectly valid criterion.