Well I agree, but my original question was, what is Riot going to take as criteria to make that decision, and that is not really a criteria Riot could use imo.
My original point is, if they used the same criteria as when they assembled franchising, which is all clout and org size, no competitive performance because as you say that may vary, I would agree Gx are first to go
But it's been 4 years and Riot has a lot more criteria to choose from now. For example, arguments in favor of GX:
- GX continues to invest in Riot Games, they bought an LEC spot.
- They have 4 active rosters in 2 games. Shows commitment and investment
- They've also been there in both games since day 1. Shows commitment and investment
- Neither of the 4 teams is bad. Sure the performances of team may vary and you want to look at what happens if they perform bad, but looking at the bigger picture it does show a high competence of the sporting department. Ability to make good projects should definitely be a factor
- It's an org they have to work with regardless in LOL since they own a spot, you want to keep a certain level of good relationship (Not saying it's definitive but should be a factor to consider)
- It's an org that has never given them any trouble, unlike others
- They always make sure to put out good content, extremely worked videos, constant output.
KOI (just an example insert random name) may have more fans, but maybe GX it's just a smoother business partner and that is something they didn't know 4 years ago which they may really value now. Or maybe they don't give a fuck about that and they just want more fans. My point in all of this being, unlike last time, this time we do not know which criteria Riot will use, at least not yet