Not for long at this pace xD
Flag: | Spain |
Registered: | November 20, 2020 |
Last post: | August 9, 2025 at 2:50 PM |
Posts: | 29624 |
I don’t write 16 posts everyday, I usually mostly get on here when there’s games or news comment definitely more than 16min. When there’s not I do not. But we’re on the middle of the season rn
12k in 1 year is twice the amount of posts per day bro
5 on 5, extremely fast paced, contact on every play, use of hands.
I’m not saying they are that similar but football is the completely opposite, it literally only has the goal in common. I’ve been to NHL, NBA and football games
Yes but adding heat comming in Portuguese is already interesting, melser calls a lot, replacing that with someone who's not gonna be as comfortable is very risky. is not aim that they are lacking
Keznit 6k with Reyna on Icebox before Aspas had a career
bro's talking as if Furia's current top flagger wasn't Argentinan
Bro has never seen Jemkin on Reyna clearly
What does that have to do with the top South American teams level
Last champions was 2 South Americans 2 NA
All regions lower teams are terrible
I don't think you can go to jail for making dog noises on a ranked game, no
Non IGL Melser has always been really solid individually
Hockey is closer top basketball than it is to football wtf
Exactly, Valorant is the most global esport in the world I believe
Don’t get it, I’m saying he hasn’t looked good on raze or on anything else for a long long time
Thanks man, appreciate it
It is entirely possible that Riot does not wanna change any of the orgs, correct. I do believe they may change someone. I'm not Riot I don't know what they will do, my whole point is the CAN replace someone after 4 years if they feel like, not saying they will
Yeah it is, it's the price of having fixed teams. Relegating the 2 worse teams is not a very good option because of the KC TH example I gave previously. Honestly I can only think of 1 solution, it's not viable now because there's only 1 ascended team tho. I think when we reach the 14 team league that is intended, the 4 non partnered teams should play a relegation tournament and the 2 worse teams should be the ones that descend, that way if a team is really good they can stay on the league but you still maintain stability for everyone else, if you ascend if you suck you go back
He's the IGL right?
Fair enough! Good luck to all of you then. Win ascension guys
Hope they win the finals. Crazy story 4 completely unknown players winning it all
Crazy final map
Thoughts on Sayonara
I always believed you guys would choose well but I didn’t expect this performance right away. Congrats, hope he can maintain it in bigger moments
Has he been living in Spain already? Gonna continue school here or something?
DFM is also a good example, not because they suck at Valorant but because they also don’t have a big fanbase or at least not one that can’t be replaced with any other big Japanese org. If they keep sucking means they have no clue how to build a team and with no fanbase they could be gone, yes
One, your article is also 1,5 years old
Two there are no other sources because that is the source, the article is written by Anonimotum who is the source. That’s the difference with yours, they don’t actually have information
But anyway don’t believe it if you don’t want to but that’s how franchising works
There is a round of org screening every single year with ascension idk what you’re saying. That is why The Guard was rejected this year and had G2 come in instead. They already know the orgs that are inside, no need to do anything with that, if they want to replace one they can just not renew them and add one of the ascended ones
Astronauts are always studying man, gotta stay up to date
Sayonara farming hard and playing 4 agents in 4 maps. This kid is going places bro. Amazing replacements for purpo I think their Ascension chances remain strong which is a lot to say after loosing their best player
Want my ID card and bank password as well?
Wow thanks, I have more upvotes than posts and only 3k downvotes in 20k posts that’s crazy ngl
I wouldn’t say never baiting tho but rarely xD
Lmao had no idea that got downvoted I thought it fitted perfectly with the story xD
#55
After 4 years Riot decides who's contract they want to renew and who's not
And yes this leaker is always correct. Also you cannot expect the source you just linked to have the same information since they look like a they write about many different things, while anonimotum is specific.
Also how in the world do you make up such an specific format if it wasn't true
Here found it. Anonimotum is the best reporter in Valorant, hasn't missed a single report and leaked every single franchised team before anyone. I am 100% positive on what I'm saying.
https://blix.gg/news/details-on-the-valorant-partnership-program-in-2023
Also thinking it's permanent can be a common misconception, thinking it's 4 years it's way too specific to be a confusion
Yet over half your posts are made within the last year which means you have a very similar post ratio to me this last year
I see what the article says but I gurantee you it's not true. 2 main reasons for you to believe me
1 My source is anonimotum who literally leaked all teams that were in where that page is just informing of what information there is, not providing their own info
2 It doesn't make sense to have indefinite partnerships, if that as the case teams would own the spots. Also indefinite how until eternity?
Leverkusen wouldn't have qualified, they would be winning ascension this year, in both the format you proved and the current one, there's no difference, you wanna change relegation not ascension
I do not get what you're saying. There's only one possibility of what I might be missing from your point. Do you mean those teams should be relegated after every split (there will be 3 splits next year) or at the end of the season? If it's after every split it could make some sense, if it's after every season it does not make sense at all and I hard disagree
It's not using hindsight to criticize a decision from the past. I'm using the previous data of what has already happened to justify which format is better for the future, completely different. I'm saying your format will already have been worse for this first year