like how is it possible to have that many negative features?

There is some direct proof too. I’m using data to help show that one reality is more probable than the other in conjunction with that. It’s that simple.

All i’m saying is it is more likely than not. I’m using data to back up my argument that typically the person making an accusation of rape is far more likely to be telling the truth than lying. i’m using data that says people who engage in emotionally abusive actions with some regularity are more likely to be sexually abusive too. Yes obviously we don’t know what happened exactly but if we use our brains we can see one reality is far more likely than the other. I’m not a judge and jury and neither are you. But the direct proof that exists combined with the data we have about abusers helps formulate opinions (not verdicts) in the absence of a conviction. And as much as you might hate it, the current evidence and what we know about sex crimes supports one side more vs the other.

You could open the study and read the methodology??? Yeah, duh, they can’t prove 100% it happened for the cases they study but they can structure them to be as accurate with the information they have and understand there is some margin of error (as with every study). If we tossed aside studies that used data that wasn’t 100% perfect we would still be bloodletting rn.

I'm not trying to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. I'm saying that given what we know about sex crimes in general and those who commit them, combined with the evidence we have against Sinatra, the reality in which he assaults her is more likely than not. Also, research has proven that courts are not good at investigating and convicting sex crimes and these cases are often times pushed aside completely. It doesn't matter if they have the resources it is whether or not they choose to apply/use them.

Let's follow your argument to its logical conclusion.

Violence and robberies are not crimes committed for the same reason as rape (duh). Studies show that lack of basic foundational needs being met (hunger, food, shelter, physical safety, etc) lead to higher crime rates. There is also a difference in the type of robberies and types of violence. A robbery committed for money that is more necessary for survival than luxury is different than someone robbing a bank to be a millionaire. Same with murder and violence. Murdering someone when you are a part of a gang you joined while young and is you entire support network and social group is different than someone murdering a random person off the street for fun. While neither are necessary, one is heavily influenced by the conditions of the persons upbringing and situation. This by no means makes it OK or justifiable. It just proves that the statistic you are referring to has far less to do with race and more to do with socioeconomic status. This is also proven by studies that show when people are lifted out of poverty or find safety and community in places not controlled by gangs crime rates decrease heavily.

Now, lets look at the situation surrounding Sinatra.

Sinatra is an up-and-coming esports player with a girlfriend, salary that only some could dream of, and stability in his life. He chooses to be abusive simply because it is easier than controlling his emotions. There is no notable socioeconomic influence making him be an asshole to his girlfriend. Furthermore, rape is a selfish crime that fulfills the need of sexual gratification in the most barbaric way possible. He has two hands and could use them instead. He could leave his GF and go hookup with someone who is consenting. The possibilities go on. Yet, he CHOSE to rape her instead. There were ZERO outside factors pushing him to do this. He is completely in control of his actions. This is true for rape in general. It is a crime that cannot be tied to socioeconomic influence the same ways that some other crimes can. Again, due to the fact that there is a quick and easy way to fulfill whatever desire without raping someone, and the individuality of the crime removes it from things like gang or group violence.

Now you see the problem. Your argument makes zero sense here and honestly you shot yourself in the foot because it just further proves how easy it would have been for him to respect her.

Next time think your logic through.

1. There is no evidence that an offender in a happy relationship now did not abuse someone in the past. There are tried and convicted rapists, murderers, and worse in happy relationships now. Why should his current GF’s moral compass be used as evidence.

2. He was at an age where his brain is capable of making decisions and the decision to act emotionally abusive is the one he chose. He was not a toddler or mentally handicapped leading to not understanding the impact of his actions.

3. She is consenting to post thirst traps. She did not consent to being abused emotionally or sexually. Basic consent is a sex-ed topic 6th graders learn. Also your argument is founded on the same logic as “depressed people can’t be happy at times” and “people with anxiety can never feel relaxed” and so on.

4. Sinatra clarifying something in a tweet doesn’t mean it is not true. Why is his word so trustworthy?

5. The world has heard him out too. Doesn’t change the fact that the evidence plus statistics still show that he assaulted her more likely than not. Not to mention RIOT themselves stated they caught him misrepresenting certain facts at multiple points during the investigation.

For the 10000th time i’m not saying he is guilty enough to be put behind bars based on the current evidence. I’m saying it’s more likely than not he is a rapist and shouldn’t be defended by the public.

What I said was a statistically proven FACT. I didn’t make it up it has been studied by research scientists multiple times. People who act in emotionally abusive ways are more likely to violate sexual boundaries too. Doesn’t mean every single person does, it just adds to the likelihood.

We aren’t in a court of law. At most, we are debating if Sinatra should be allowed to return to Valorant pro play. Imagine if every boss had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an employee they are trying to fire deserves to be let go. Imagine if you couldn’t fire an employee who was accused of being inappropriate in the workplace until they got a court conviction. That would be stupid.

We use statistics to determine whether something is more likely than not 24/7 across the entire human experience. The evidence plus the statistics absolutely are enough to say that he raped her more likely than not.

Here is another well researched statistic for you:

Both people who are emotionally abusive, physically abusive, or both are more likely than the average person to be convicted or accused or rape at some point during their life.

Also what you personally see on twitter is not evidence. That is purely anecdotal. There is a reason anecdotal evidence has killed hundreds of thousands, if not millions, over the course of human history. Cause it is wildly unreliable and is usually not indicative of the truth.

1. This argument would make sense if the metrics we have to prove someone guilty vs innocent was correct a majority of the time. Countless studies have proven that the justice system lets rapists walk FAR more than just conviction. This is separate from the fact there are dozens of screenshots and audio evidence.

2. There may not be enough public evidence for conviction (beyond a reasonable doubt) but this isn’t a court of law. The current evidence plus statistical likelihood makes it far more likely than not.

3. The most effective method for stopping a famous abuser is certainly not going to the cops. This is once again proven by repeated studies showing a horrifically low rate of abusers being charged and/or convicted. Putting evidence out to the public and RIOT who are in direct control of his career makes plenty of practical sense.

4. Statistical 5% vs 95%, plus all the screenshots and the audio recording, doesn’t seem very believable to me.

Addressing claims that no conviction means she was lying, false accusations are commonplace and she did it for attention, etc.

98% of perpetrators walk free

"For every 1000 sexual assaults, 50 reports lead to arrests, 28 cases lead to a felony convictions, and only 25 perpetrators are sentenced to incarceration." Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2012-2016 (2017).

This study also showed that accusations of rape that are proven credible are often times not reported or investigations are dropped out of fear, mental health, or distrust in the justice system.

Similar studies continue to show only a 1-4% rate of conviction, including one published in Jan. of 2025 (NBC investigation) which looked at thousands of documents from police, prosecution offices, and courts across the entire USA.

Many studies have been done on false reporting. The general conclusion is that 5% of accusations are likely false, however when stricter criteria is applied for evidence (direct evidence proves it is false or a direct admission of lying from the accuser) the rate drops to 2%.

NOT TO MENTION THERE IS AUDIO RECORDING OF SINATRA ASSAULTING HER, HE DIDN'T PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE HE CLAIMED HE HAD AS HE PROMISED IN HIS STATEMENT, MADE FALSE STATEMENTS TO RIOT, AND THERE IS TEXT EVIDENCE OF HIM BEING EMOTIONALLY ABUSIVE REPETITIVELY

You have to ask yourself, if there is a paper trail showing that he regularly is emotionally abusive and does not care about her emotionally well being and boundaries, and audio evidence of him violating consent (sexual assault), PLUS the statistical likelihood of her accusation being credible rather than not....

WHY ARE YOU DEFENDING HIM?

in one example she is not consenting to something and the other she is.

your point is?

has nrg been struggling in scrims compared to their expected performance? do you personally think they will fall off or do well?

posted in site feedback

@mods @admins @god

i predicted nrg and tl brazil this year i feel like the goat rn

everyone told me i was wrong when i said NRG would win champs after their horrible stage 1 performance….

…and everyone told me i was wrong when i said TLBrazil would win it all at the start of GC Champs

I KNOW BALL

how you feeling now buddy

can someone explain what she did/is being excused of?

just listened to it and i think its slop

since whatever i say is bad is bad im right

hi my name is 31Raven and this is my logic

now im going to go back to sitting on my ass and post some more from my cheeto crusted keyboard worn out by my 12+ posts per day over the 13 months ive been on this site

do something with your life man hope your parents are proud of u

yeah ok 31Raven im sure your opinion means far more than expert music reviewers

keep listening to your dopamine slop for your fried tiktok brain

biggest scam in modern vlr history

oh and this slop too

https://www.albumoftheyear.org/album/1215955-lil-wayne-tha-carter-vi.php

https://www.albumoftheyear.org/album/1102859-ethel-cain-perverts.php

vs

https://www.albumoftheyear.org/album/815383-playboi-carti-music.php

sure bud

are you showering in water contaminated with lead by chance

12 hours no reply

tiktok brain

did you even listen far enough to hear the vocals

u dont know ballll

what is the best song released in 2025

ill start

onanist by ethel cain

TLBrazil is the best team i’ve been saying this

but honestly is was free for g2 if they didn’t swing out of the vipers pit in a 2v1

GPTZero: "We are highly confident this text was AI generated, 100% AI generated"

wanting to be tied up does not necessarily equate to top or bottom

TL Brazil about to put belt to ass

seduce him

let him come to whatever conclusion about his identity he wants. at the end of the day all you can do is be supportive of him no matter what labels or lack of labels he chooses to give himself.

hes a great igl but in a 5v5 fps game if one of your players is going -30 and -35 in b2b grand finals where you got 2nd place then there is a problem

hydrogen bomb vs hydrogen bomb nerfed by a broken and old bomber plane named boaster

indigo (one of my favorite colors/flowers) + crow (i like birds)

what is your take on this question bronzil_enjoyer

what are the terrible thoughts

what

i feel like not enough americans drink tea

there is so many types there is legit something for everybody

i try to spread the tea gospel irl as much as i can

so yummy

i really liked watching drx during their champs run i honestly hope they do well again

best team on paper vs what team you think will win the most/do the best (in any or all regions)?

and favorite kind of cat?

NRG
GX or ULF
DRX
WOL or NOVA

liquid brazil on top

wtf is lucifer the show

fucken echo chamber in here what is going on