Are you good homie? I don't know if you only watch valorant or anything but out of those three orgs, it would be easier to assume that Sen have the smallest budget. Sen is the smallest and most financially weak team out of those three teams in esports. And how would you even know who has the most budget? Even if Sen was a bigger org which they aren't, the budget is up to the management to decide, not anything that we can guess. Furthermore, you now start talking about the elements of the roster e.g the players on the team. If you are trying to make a point on the org not picking up the right players, how is this kaplan's fault? Sykkont was the one who made this team. And don't even say that Kaplan should have made roster changes because by the time he was head coach, sen was already getting dissed for changing the roster up too much. Like its crazy, the coach makes changes and the fans go ballistic, but if the coach doesn't make changes the fans still go ballistic. Plus, from what I heard, Sen seemed to be doing very well in scrims, so there seemed to be no need to change anything bts right? If the players cannot perform as well as they do in scrim how is that kaplan's fault.

You literally just proved my point. You say that EG without Demon1 lacks a consistent jett player, yet how is that potter's fault if there is role inflexibility in the players prior to Demon1. That is a problem for the players to fix, to try to improve their agent pool, not the coach's fault that the team now lacks a jett player. And how is the part about their past results relevant here? Firstly, Potter has been able to head coach a t1 team for 2 years now, she will ofc have some results, whereas kaplan has not as a head coach. I dont know if you are trying to prove how Potter is a good coach whereas Kaplan isn't, but it doesn't make sense because Kaplan has only been head coach for a few months with constant roster changes. Your last sentences doesn't make sense either because you make it sound like Demon1 enabled Potter because the only change between a good EG and a bad EG was adding Demon1. Isn't the coach suppose to enable the team and player, not the other way around. The way you make it sound, isn't that a detriment to the sen player's inability to enable kaplan as a coach?

Since Mini has consistent results, what can we say about potter? EG is praised during Tokyo for being the ones for innovating the meta and leading in terms of strats, yet during the beginning of the America's season, EG was awful. The only change that occurred were between the players on the server. Granted Demon1 was playing out of his mind, at Tokyo, EG seemed to be very team-oriented and strat heavy. What I am implying is when a team has bad results, people will blame the coach, yet when that same coach has good results, they will be praised. The work the coaches do are invisible to the fans and it is up to the management who've seen the bts to figure that out.

Mini and Boaster have been on fnc since day one. The player's ability to frag and work together is not on the coach. Mini can create the strats, but it is on the players to develop chemistry. Results speak. Mini has been creating strats for 2 years now, yet he is only now getting recognition for his work. Yet, when there were not results, was he really a bad coach?

keep blaming coaches. They are not the ones on the server.

Bro did not spell synergy like that

It's tradition. They'll win something eventually just like liquid csgo. I'll wait.

I don't think Syke is the best on Icebox and on Bind Liquid use to put Soulcas on Skye but in the grand final against Giants he did well on Raze so I guess they are continuing with that. And I guess Navi just doesn't run Skye on Bind.

Both EMEA and NA have 2 circuit point slots and one LCQ. So the most either region can get is 4 by winning Berlin.

I mean. Someone has to be at the bottom. But not winning a single series is hard to take in. Maybe some roster changes or bringing players from the LDL but this roster won't be around in spring I don't think

You should probably focus on that test. You can always look at who wins on this site or if you want to find out through the game, you can turn off spoilers on this site and just look up a vod on YT or something.

First of all, just win. If you win, you only play one game a day which is the advantage of being in the upper bracket. Playing multiple games a day is part of losing the upper bracket game. Plus, having both the lower finals and grand finals on the same day would be even worse as both are Bo5s. That has the possibility of a team playing for like 7+ hours straight. And sometimes, seeding is important like in Masters 2 where the first seeded team from the regions with multiple teams got to skip the initial day and got a pass to the second day. It's not like this is unprecedented, a lot of these players have already gone through this because some tournaments in CS also implement this kind of system.