i am tho i havent seen toronto, but its not about complaining cuz i wanna see them win but i want a system that gives the most entertainment or atleast one that make sense, its an unbiased criticsm, that being said IF iam bias, your saying i shouldnt be complaining because they lost 2 finals and won 1 , then why would i support doub map ban your own argument makes no sense (like sure 1 win is better than most teams but 2vs1 win? )

either your team loose to double veto, or your team wins because of it and its undeserved, or the best team win any way without the help of double map ban, it just adds nothing, like it incentivize teams to go through the uppers but your already doing that anyway cuz of the fear of being eliminated by a top 4 int team on the elim bracket and not getting to choose team a or team b like at any point in the bracket

i did say ns would still win with their indiv performance, but it would be better entertainment wise, 3 2 double map ban or 3 1 without, (thos it could still be 3 2 if they didnt have to play corrode first considering ns chose is team B and they pick breeze/pear would have better mental)
i do agree with what you said the maps didnt favor prx, that double map ban wouldnt just favor NS imagine nrg got it against them, either your team loose because to double veto or your team wins because of it and its undeserved or the best team win any way without the help of double map ban, it just adds nothing, like it incentivize teams to go through the uppers but your already doing that anyway cuz of the fear of being eliminated

yea but if it were the other way around it double map ban wouldve been too much (now considering the indiv performance ns probably still win pearl/breeze but prx would still have a better chance unlike corrode and especially abyss) , minI makes a good point on double map ban fnc vs eg (clipped on aloneval), i dont think double map ban is a horrendous system but i just dont really see any downside with normal 1 map ban if anything its better