MIBR is reaping what they sowed. They didnβt need to change the team in 2024 that lineup just needed more time.
| Flag: | Brazil |
| Registered: | June 5, 2025 |
| Last post: | May 17, 2026 at 8:56 PM |
| Posts: | 8 |
MIBR is reaping what they sowed. They didnβt need to change the team in 2024 that lineup just needed more time.
The problem was that MIBR gave away Haven; otherwise, we wouldn't even have had the fifth map. Honestly, I can't see G2, which lost disastrously to FURIA, beating MIBR.
It's impossible, G2 didn't win even 2 maps against FURIA, and either NRG or G2 will be out; I find it very difficult for MIBR not to secure a spot.
ππ€£π€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£ππππ€£π€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£ππππ€£π€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£ππππ€£π€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£ππππ€£π€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£ππππ€£π€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£ππππ€£π€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£ππππ€£π€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£π€£π€£πΉπ€£
The issue is that LOUD is a very rich organization, and like any other company, it prioritizes financial sustainability above everything else.
For example, they clearly had enough resources to keep the roster with Sacy and Saadhak, but they chose to cut costs instead.
That said, I think LOUD gets criticized way more than it should. In the end, they did the same thing many other organizations do people just tend to exaggerate when it comes to LOUD, especially because of that decision.
Their infrastructure is top-tier, but they wonβt spend more than what they believe is reasonable on a roster or any project, and thatβs a business choice.