Congo1
Flag: Europe
Registered: February 18, 2023
Last post: September 30, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Posts: 10917
1 •• 207 208 209 210 211 212 213

fnc navi obvious top 2

after that its most likely two of:

Koi, Vitality, Giants, TL

Dark horses:

KC, FUT, BBL

only heretics have no chance. everybody else can do it. a close league

posted about 2 years ago

This needs to get traction. Disproves all the brazilians in denial

posted about 2 years ago

Say less kid. Go hide in the shadows. Run from EU supremacy.

posted about 2 years ago

TALK NOW BRONZILIAN

posted about 2 years ago

NEVER CHOKENATIC AGAIN

posted about 2 years ago

Americas and APAC get used to this. FNC is gonna sweep this year.

posted about 2 years ago

and champs after

posted about 2 years ago

20-1

posted about 2 years ago

Who do some brazilians have to be so insecure all the time. Little man syndrome

posted about 2 years ago

Nats was stronger at Masters and Chronicle at Champions. I consider them equal. Those 2 were the main reason for Gambits success.

posted about 2 years ago

Honestly i expect another FNC 3-0. Maybe 3-1. They are a truly special team

posted about 2 years ago

If it makes you feel better i think Leo and Shao are the clear top 2. Personally i think this semi performance pushed leo over Shao but its close.

posted about 2 years ago

Asia is the most top heavy region there is.

A lot of big name Americas teams fell apart. Only LOUD and NRG looked top level. Lev and Furia might be decent shouts but thats it.

Give EMEA 2-3 months and you'll see how good the midfield becomes

posted about 2 years ago

Dumb narrative. Koi and giants played good matches against americas Nr. 2 NRG. Vitality went to OT before mental broke in second map vs LEV. FUT Nearly 2-0d 100T. BBL took a map off DRX. KC played 2 close maps vs LOUD. All of this while EU has the highest % of teams without established cores.

Theres actually no region that deserves the spot as much as EMEA.

posted about 2 years ago

I wouldnt say by far. The MVP can only be him or Shao. He won and played great so it should be Leo.

posted about 2 years ago

Historically yes but Boaster is having a absurd tournament. His midrounding has been great and his stats are the best of all Igls so he is fragging too.

I would have put FNS first if he fragged better.

posted about 2 years ago

Duelists:

  1. Derke
  2. Aspas
  3. Cned

Initiators:

  1. Leo
  2. Shao
  3. Chronicle
  4. Crashies

Controllers (weaker since its often igl role):

  1. Mako
  2. Tuyz
  3. Som
  4. Nivera

Sentinels:

  1. Alfajer
  2. Less
  3. Suygetsu
  4. Nats

IGLs:

  1. Boaster
  2. FNS
  3. Saadhak
  4. Ange1
  5. Stax

Top 5 across all Roles:

  1. Leo
  2. Shao
  3. Derke
  4. Mako
  5. Chronicle
posted about 2 years ago

Well its been a fight tbh.

posted about 2 years ago
  1. FNC
  2. NAVI
  3. LOUD
  4. DRX
  5. NRG
posted about 2 years ago

Delusion.

This is reality.

Fnatic
Navi
Loud
DRX
NRG

posted about 2 years ago

FNC 3-0

posted about 2 years ago

They are the team that was promised

EDIT: title should be 0 maps lost

posted about 2 years ago

They have to make icebox B site playable

posted about 2 years ago

Great strats. Immense firepower. Flexibility.

posted about 2 years ago

LEO vs SHAO duel for best player in the world.

Right now Leo is in the lead

posted about 2 years ago

i agree. Their stats confirm that.

posted about 2 years ago

Having male voice/ being male passing.
Also growing up as male before coming out and getting used to the space by then.

posted about 2 years ago

Your entire "evidence" is nothing but a collection of personal anecdotes.

Tate nuthugger.

posted about 2 years ago

They would not be better than the male scene. There wouldnt be gendered scenes at all anymore. We are probably 100s of years away from 50/50 parity. But 20,30,40% could eventually be achieved.

posted about 2 years ago

Have you ever thought of the concept of societal conditioning? And gender roles? Do you ever step out of your own shoes for a broader perspective? Educate yourself? Step out of your bubble?

posted about 2 years ago

The ways people find out someones gender differ between the games but the result remains the same. And there are fore more ways to tell besides voice. E.g. name, avatar, whatever cosmetic options there are, champion picks and so on.

posted about 2 years ago

Obvious biological fact you pulled out of your ass. Your baby brain making some biased anecdotal connections is not scientific methodology.

posted about 2 years ago

At some point if you enter the high elo/pro scene you have to reveal your identity to some degree. The moment people connect your online name to the female gender you are going to face discrimination. You also cannot express your gender in any way before that (name, skins, champions played, role). Girls often like playing pretty/cute support champs and losers will attack you once they see your op.gg

And therefore you are partially onto something but the conclusion is wrong. There are probably more casually playing women than those in high elo circles. But the reason in once again societal pressure.

posted about 2 years ago

Everybody who actually knows about chess knows how full of shit you are. Every top pro knows of the elitism of players and their highly condescending view of women.

The belief women are mentally inferior is very common here. Also backlash due to " the role of women not being competing" but the usual female gender role shit.

posted about 2 years ago

Why reply when you didnt even read his comment? There are FAR more men playing video games. Therefore men dominating pro play is simple statistics.
Men can choose from the 0.01% of their group while women have to water their pool down significantly and having to choose from their top 1%. Obviously if you can be faaar more picky you pick better fruits.

If gaming was more welcoming and the female playerbase was equal in size we'd be much closer to a 50/50 split than we are currently.

posted about 2 years ago

Trans-women cant really get rid of their masculine voice. Therefore since the trait that would earn them harassment is not visible when playing games they get by better. Also many trans folk grew up with their wrong gender/didnt come out yet so they could get used to the space as kids and teenagers.

Saying women dont like competing is the most loser incel take imaginable. You really snitched on yourself that you never talk to girls that arent your mother.

posted about 2 years ago

They should be but they might need multiple months to get there.

posted about 2 years ago

KC has igl issues and 2 bots on the team. Liquid have potential but need to redeem themselves.

I would put Giants, Vitality and Koi on the same tier right now.

posted about 2 years ago

Notice the very few comments in this thread but all the silent downfrags. You guys are cowards.

posted about 2 years ago

Another thing a lot of these losers get wrong is making the baby ass deduction:

Gaming is men only --> must mean all women are genetically inferior at playing VIDEO games

Like how fucking dumb are you. Evertime a girl uses the mic theres a 50%+ chance of getting told to shut the fuck up because youre a woman or the old " Back to the kitchen" Or " Girl in team = lose", "you suck (cuz girl) " etc. Of course people dont wanna play as much if you get treated like this constantly.

Some losers counterpoint here is that "men get shit too, people are toxic to us too!!! ". Like dude, no shit. But noone shits on you BECAUSE YOURE MALE.

--> That means women get: The usual toxicity + EXTRA MISOGINY ON TOP === Much more toxicity than you deflecting losers get.

posted about 2 years ago

Youre critical thinking skills are elementary school levels. Go to the other thread to help you understand.

posted about 2 years ago

Are you fucking r-? The tier of the comp doesnt matter. The comp itself matters a lot. You personally have no obligation to be interested and watch but going out of your way to disparage their play is just a dick move.

posted about 2 years ago

On the other GC post right now a bunch of guys say things like keep the "fake women" away from the "womens competition". Do you really not get what the comp really is for??? Its literally in the name. Game Changers.

They introduced this to normalize the presence of marginalized groups in gaming (E.g. women, both cis and trans as well as non-binary and so on) and therefore over time raise acceptance of them. That would in turn lead to many more of them to be comfortable in this space and starting gaming.

This is --> E <-- sports. Not Boxing or football. There is literally 0 reason to keep cis and trans women apart. Being taller and stronger doesnt impact anything in the digital world. You're just using this situation to shit on trans women like the bigots you are. Too dumb to realize that your demands make no sense.

And lastly a lot of people dont understand with what words to express the difference between "real" women and "fake" (?) ones. Which is understandable if not done maliciously. It goes like this:

  1. Women (umbrella term)

1.1 Cis-women <-- this js what you call "real"
1.2 Trans-women

posted about 2 years ago

What exactly to you believe is the "biological difference" that "leads to different performance levels" ?

posted about 2 years ago

Honestly i think it would be cool for FNC to finally get one. And Chronicle being the only 2x would be great since he gets so little attention despite being one of the goats.

posted about 2 years ago

And why do you think is a seperate competition for women necessary?

posted about 2 years ago

Navi has already won one.

posted about 2 years ago

What? Why exactly do you think Game Changers exists? Im very curious.

posted about 2 years ago

What???

posted about 2 years ago
1 •• 207 208 209 210 211 212 213