Do you think this new idea of giving the grand finalist from the upper bracket 2 bans and first map pick?
It may seem like a lot but I think it’s a good idea compared to last year where all they got was the first ban I think
Do you think this new idea of giving the grand finalist from the upper bracket 2 bans and first map pick?
It may seem like a lot but I think it’s a good idea compared to last year where all they got was the first ban I think
Think it should be Loud getting 1 ban and first pick and optic with 1 ban, its fucked that optic cant ban their perma ban
It does seem a little unfair ngl, but we gotta see how this series goes before the judge can be called
its is better than cs, where is a already 1-0 series, i like the way fighting game tournaments do, which is the loser has to win 2 bo5 in a row to become champion, but is actually impossible in a long game like valo
Bro its a final match.
Its better to have 2 bans and pick than starts 1-0 on the series
think its only fair for Loud to ban one map, then optic pick one and loud ban a second map no? this seems too unfair
exactly, but LOUD gets to ban their worst 2 maps and optic HAS to play their worst map... seems unfair no?
I think its fair, the previous lans dont have anything for the upper bracket teams imo so ig its good this time. Its also good so the fans cant have an excuse about their team running a momentum or sum lol
its fair i think..better than giving 1map lead cause thats just too much of an advantage and getting first pick and ban is not a big advantage in bo5... they could ve done something like loud gets to pick the side for all maps but vetos are normal