on one hand allowing other events from companies with money (gambling sponsored) would be good for the scene as more tournaments and stuff
on the other hand i tuned into a CS tournament recently and the casters were forced to say "Theres a 57% chance of this team winning on Polymarket!!!! place your bets!" at halftime and that made me cringe
the coinbase econ report was bad enough
man idc if riot are running every events
more games = more fun = more competition
i do worry about the quality of games decreasing with teams having less time to prac
CS can have so many tournaments because the meta doesn't hard shift every two months
I never really like the idea of spending an entire week analyzing your opponent just for half of your ideas to fail and some guy to drop 30
lets just see people drop 30 without spending a week analyzing ur opponent
No, that's just the smokescreen in front of the real target of his criticism and delusional takes, which is Counter-Strike.
I mean in some ways it's comparable to val so I don't really see what's wrong with drawing comparisons
I didn't say there's anything wrong with comparing the two games, what are you talking about
lue uudellee ilmiselvästi hän ei tykännyt kuinka juontajat joutuivat mainostamaan uhkapelaamista
what
i literally brought up something similar in valorant that annoys me right after
i just dislike polymarket more than coinbase
I've watched a few CS tournaments and I enjoyed all of them
id love to see more tournaments but gambling sponsors wouldnt be good i think
Discord