He is not just a good igl, he is so adaptable to other agents and roles, and his aim is so good
I mean, last year LOUD basically played with him doing coach (assistant) + IGL, when his portuguese wasn't that 100% yet.
While FNS had Chet to support him, and still does nowadays.
I'm saying that the Chet + FNS duo is very good, but Saad manages to be better in all factors, since we don't know if FNS will continue to be a good IGL with a different coach (Since most NRG-Optic tactics, he himself said that it is necessary to have extensive information on the enemy because he is dependent on anti-tactics to do IGL, it is as if his game was all calculated and the one who does that for him is Chet, they work together)
Saad manages to be better in my opinion for flexibility + aim.
Maybe we think that FNS is better at mid-round because everything is calculated before it.
When the game starts to escape his notion (as we are seeing in this first game of LODU x NRG) you realize that he doesn't make much difference if the game escapes the calculations, while Saad is more flexible if this problem happens.
I'm not talking bad about FNS, he is a god IGL.
I'm just saying that Saadhak is more flexible and has better AIM so he can do IGL in a more "loose" way compared to FNS.
If we had to put an IGL on any random T1 NA teams surely Saad would fit in most teams compared to FNS for its flexibility, that's what I'm saying.
That's why I gave preference to Saadhak over FNS.