why would you exclude these? They happened. You can't ignore them and act as if it wasn't literally half of the events he's played for the last year
fpx
posted in
Valorant Discussion
why would you only look at the past year, my only point is that you have recency bias, which i explained is a bad mentality to have and why blowing a roster up because of it leads to tons of issues
look at his entire time on fpx
because FPX has changed a lot and NathanD is gone and clearly Life hasn't been the same either
which is why you find a better system for a clearly talented player 2024 fpx is the good system im referencing. instead they blew up their roster multiple times over the past year and a half, which led to life being kicked which is just stupid. recency bias is not a good thing to base replacing a player off of. i explained why in a different post if you wanna read my full reply, no pressure if not though. anyways it boils down to not letting chemistry build and not actually working on team issues, its like putting a bandaid on your knee after it got shot. there's a chance it holds and stops the bleeding, but that chance is SO incredibly low because you're gambling on a new set of players to perform with less experience together, it can work but it's rare and hard. and this is especially poor decision making in FPX's case because they SHOWED they are a good team and have chemistry and work together, and life performed during that. the moment things stopped going their way they pussied out and kicked him instead of working the issues out and getting back to them being a top team again
well he just found himself a different system. FPX can do without him, he's not the only guy in china who can use a mouse
Discord