Sen and 100t | VLR.gg

#1

MentalSwmr

Looking at it from afar Sen screwed over themselves and 100t picking up bang. Zander was forced to play passive and bang was forced to play aggressive. If Sen got Zander 100t and Sen would have had a much better season

#2

Maniacwolf

0

Frags

+

–

um

#3

dimmed

0

Frags

+

–

Agreed, and it probably would've been better for SEN if they let Zander mid-round too

#4

GodAwfulGod

0

Frags

+

–

I mean Sen also had the opportunity to get Skuba and didn't and look how that turned out

#6

SnorlaxEnjoyer

0

Frags

+

–

blame knights his buyout was so high at the time, some players said high 6-figures

#8

SadPandaBear

0

Frags

+

–

I think they meant promoting Skuba during the 2025 season.

#11

SnorlaxEnjoyer

0

Frags

+

–

oh right yeah sen did fuck up there. skuba has been a great player for ages.

#10

notapandaa

0

Frags

+

–

he was on knights in 2025?

#14

SnorlaxEnjoyer

0

Frags

+

–

I think the realisation has already been made you are late notapandaa

#5

SnorlaxEnjoyer

0

Frags

+

–

Give us bang back and u can have zander

#7

dimmed

0

Frags

+

–

downgrade

#13

SnorlaxEnjoyer

0

Frags

+

–

shhh

#9

juicyburgers

0

Frags

+

–

hello...

i see PEAK ESPORTS EXCELLENCE REGION flag... but i read INFERIOR REGION PROPAGANDA...

BANG is good player... he just felt pity upon WEAK region for dominating too much...

charity rounds... for WEAK region...

#12

ChaosWarden

0

Frags

+

–

AGREED. But the issue is they(SEN) value tier 1 players more and also bang was good last season and then 100t was forced to fill the gap with at least the same value and zander was their best option.