SMB 7th? Even Fnatic and Giants above SMB? Why does this leaderboard even exist?
SMB 7th? Even Fnatic and Giants above SMB? Why does this leaderboard even exist?
Ranking is still in its beta version, so can't really blame anyone. They will certainly fix it.
It’s based on points from wins and losses so if SMB want to get points they need to win more games against EMEA teams. They were just formed so they don’t have many points.
I thought the whole community had already agreed that it's not to be trusted in its current form seems not since people are still baffled about it
omg, topicstarter, like other glory hunter kids cant understand one simple thing - one tournament cant place your team over other strong teams who show their best for past few month.
Smb is a new team they can not put them so high just because they beat 3 big teams in 1 tourney.
because smb are new so they have less data points unlike the others who have been consistent
so I looked their rank points and I think they should get more points from the acend and g2 game
and fnatic should lose 60+ on first loss and 40+ on second loss to g2
Their should be 2 separate rankings imo : 1) Leaderboard ranking i.e ranking that accumulates all points based on rankings on tier 1 tournaments ( vcts ) and 2) Form rankings i.e ranking teams based on current performance level irrespective of what they won in previous tourneys. And a mix of these 2 should be considered when seeding and not points acquired from farming tier 2 nsgs
Also Heretics is 8th yet they have a brand new roster if they change more than 2 players in one go or something they should lose all of it as they are not the 8th best team with this roster