0

EMEA = America's

Comments:
Threaded Linear
← View full thread
#28
Psion
1
Frags
+

if you take out lock\in:
EMEA is 6-15 at international events without FNC (28.6%)
AMER without EG were 14-11 (56%)
AMER without LOUD were 17-9(60.7%)
AMER without both were 5-6(45.5%)
without Navi and FNC: 5-11(31.25%)
The idea that besides FNC EMEA was a better region last year is some revisionist history lmfao

#30
Mortadelo
-1
Frags
+

Dude I appreciate your research but you're either not understanding what I'm saying or not wanting to understand it. I'm not asking for the record without FNC EG LOUD NRG or NAVI. I'm asking for the record without any of them at the same time, which can't be done because they haven't played.

I'm saying our #4 and under is better than Americas #4 and under and you're trying to dispute it with stats of your #1 2 and 3
My point is that EG beating FNC doesn't make Furia better than Vitality

#31
Psion
1
Frags
+

mf then ask any fucking analyst why EMEA is better this year, its not because the top is betters its because its depth is better and it had awful depth last year

#33
Mortadelo
-1
Frags
+

We're getting closer to an understanding now. Again, my opinion is that the fact that EMEA had awful depth last year is a misconception created by our top teams no performing well. But our #3, #4 and #5 performed better at champs than Americas #4 and equal to the #3

And then again this does not proof that KOI was better than MIBR, it just says that the top teams don't represent the whole region

#34
Psion
1
Frags
+

so your opinion is literally just revisionist, people at the time(throughout all of 2023) said EMEA had awful depth and you have no data to back yourself up other than KRU going 0-2 at champs and NRG pulling a bilibili which was the same tournament that EMEA had no teams top 3 and Americas had 2

#35
Mortadelo
-1
Frags
+

And here we go again, EMEA did not have awful depth through 2023 what I'm saying is that people just say that because our top teams didn't perform well and that is not what fucking depth means

And yes I'm using the KRU and NRG example because that's the only time that we could see not top teams at international, if there were other examples we could use them but there aren't

#36
Psion
1
Frags
+

"And here we go again, EMEA did not have awful depth through 2023 what I'm saying is that people just say that because our top teams didn't perform well and that is not what fucking depth means"
once again, this goes against what every fucking analyst said last year and is literally revisionist history
your last place was KC, the only team DFM last year had a chance of beating
Our last place team was KRU, who made it to champs.

You have literally no evidence to support EMEA being better top to bottom last year you cannot look at me with a straight face and seriously compare KC to KRU or 100T to TH

#37
Mortadelo
-2
Frags
+

We're not going anywhere so let's just agree to disagree here

#38
Psion
1
Frags
+

yeah arguing with a flat earther doesn't usually get me anywhere either

#39
Mortadelo
-1
Frags
+

Sure lil bro

Btw stop upfragging yourself because it's kinds sad

#32
Psion
0
Frags
+

even with FNATIC Americas was 15-10 vs EMEA, you cannot say EMEA was better top to bottom

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment