Lamelo and em got it. better players then and now.
0
2016 Chino Hills vs 2020 Montverde
posted in
Off Topic
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Flumplestiltski [#2]cade and them every day of the week
in 2016 lamelo wasn't even the best player
lamelo wasnt even trying back then, thats how good he was.
Jitu [#4]Cade n em clears so hard, you would have to be delusional to think 2016 Chino Hills was better
Montverde was beating better teams + that roster panned out better in the NBA
no way you think montverde is better in nba. scottie is a giannis wanna be, while cade is only scoring above 20 cause hes in the worst team in the nba. Lamelo clears both, and lonzo is a decent playmaker.
RnJn [#8]no way you think montverde is better in nba. scottie is a giannis wanna be, while cade is only scoring above 20 cause hes in the worst team in the nba. Lamelo clears both, and lonzo is a decent playmaker.
arguing Lamelo + Lonzo > Scottie + Cade is some nasty work ngl
HackNaija [#10]arguing Lamelo + Lonzo > Scottie + Cade is some nasty work ngl
Especially when Lonzo has missed 80% of his career NBA games and when he did play he was a role player
Flumplestiltski [#12]Especially when Lonzo has missed 80% of his career NBA games and when he did play he was a role player
Except for his last 40 games with the bulls where he was incredible? Lonzo and Lamelo aren't better, but partially because they're both PGs and neither are good at defense. Lamelo > Cade > Scottie > Lonzo.
grenji [#11]If 2016 chino hills gets like 17 year old Lamelo they beat cade n em easily
yeah but they get 13 year old melo instead
Paulwall918 [#16]What you know about duncanville? 👀
I used to live there, off of duncanville rd nearby ranchero
grenji [#14]Except for his last 40 games with the bulls where he was incredible? Lonzo and Lamelo aren't better, but partially because they're both PGs and neither are good at defense. Lamelo > Cade > Scottie > Lonzo.
did you just say Lonzo isn't good at defense? do you even watch basketball bro???
FDWC- [#20]Montverde stomping Chino Hills by 40 LMAO
they got like 10 top 100 player that year
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/BpkLqURonRU
this a classic
RnJn [#8]no way you think montverde is better in nba. scottie is a giannis wanna be, while cade is only scoring above 20 cause hes in the worst team in the nba. Lamelo clears both, and lonzo is a decent playmaker.
Lonzo is practically disabled, he's physically handicapped at this point and his career is over. LaMelo is a good star but you can argue that he's just a good scorer on a bad team just like Cade. It's ridiculous to say Cade can't score 20 on a good team, he could probably do it even more often than on the Pistons. Cade is one of the most blitzed players in the NBA, iirc 2nd behind Luka because every other team knows hes the only offensive threat on the Pistons. Scottie is also amazing, you're tripping if you don't think he's good. LaMelo is better than both but everyone else from Chino Hills is ass. Moody is one Steve Kerr realization from being a 15+ minimum ppg starter. He's good, its just that Kerr hates developing young players.
grenji [#14]Except for his last 40 games with the bulls where he was incredible? Lonzo and Lamelo aren't better, but partially because they're both PGs and neither are good at defense. Lamelo > Cade > Scottie > Lonzo.
lonzo was a good defender on the bulls, ur tripping. but i agree with how u rank the 4 players
Jitu [#24]lonzo was a good defender on the bulls, ur tripping. but i agree with how u rank the 4 players
ill take the L on lonzo defense take. Haven't watched that mf suit up for 3 years forgot about his defense.
If it wasn’t for the green mountain boys and their cannons, the north probably lose the civil war.
If the north lose the civil war who knows how long slavery would have lasted and if basketball would have ever been invented.
Therefore, Mountverde is the clear and decisive winner.
Also, just looking at the names it’s pretty obvious that a green mountain is > than a hill made of pants.
Discord