Grand final map vetos

#1

Eyedd

I always thought that the double map ban was too powerful for grand finals. I think each team should get 1 ban, but the picks order should change. Something like how hockey or baseball handle home field advantage - upper ban, lower ban, upper pick map 1, upper pick map 2, lower pick map 3 and map 4, map remains.
Thoughts?

#2

Kei8

0

Frags

+

–

pretty sure thats how it already works?

#5

Cresp

0

Frags

+

–

Nah upper gets both at least thats how it was last year

#3

since_beta

0

Frags

+

–

man explains what literally happens

#4

Eyedd

0

Frags

+

–

Upper finals winner gets both map bans? Oh damn I didn’t realize the upper winner gets both map bans and the two first picks. That’s a ridiculous advantage wtf

#6

Eyedd

0

Frags

+

–

Ok so as is upper seed gets both bans then map1, map2 and map4 picks. How is that the advantage rito decided on, that’s absolutely op af. Ridiculous advantage. If you’re going to do double elim for every single lan you gotta have a better formula, that’s an insanely strong advantage..

#7

Cannot

0

Frags

+

–

From the comments I'm reading I pretty sure people are super confused and just wrong about what the system is currently and what this guy is proposing.

Current system: Upper Ban, Upper Ban -> Upper Pick, Lower Pick, Upper Pick, Lower Pick -> Remaining Map

Proposed System: Upper Ban, Lower Ban -> Upper Pick, Upper Pick, Lower Pick, Lower Pick -> Remaining Map

#8

Eyedd

0

Frags

+

–

Thank you, yes. I got super confused but this is clear and correct.
I feel like in a grand final both teams should be able to ban their perks bans and play their best maps, but the upper seed deserves some sort of advantage in the map order.