Which roster aged better? Optic or Gambit

FNS vs Redgar
Sheydos vs Crashies
NaTs vs Marved
Chronicle vs Victor
D3ffo vs Yay
Just talking about their level right now. What they did back when they played for GMB/Optic doesn't matter.

OpTic 100%

optic but its hard to judge the level of a player like sheydos when hes on a worse team than everyone else aside from players not in franchising.

Obv gambit

nats = 2nd best sentinel ITW
chronicle = 2 titles and top 3 flex
d3ffo = unlucky
redgar = still doing good
sheydos = still doing good

yay = chamber abuser + trolled his career
marved = trolled career
victor = meh
fns = good IGL
crashies = good

Currently:
FNS > Redgar
Sheydos > Crashies
NaTs > Marved (Marved is just getting back to competing at a high level)
Chronicle = Victor
D3ffo < Yay

Yay>D3ffo (havent seen anything on d3ffo in a long time, could be NA publicity, could be a bad fall off)
FNS>Redgar
Crashies>=Sheydos (This one you could say im smoking crack, but off their current records and popoff potentials imma tie it. Sheydos can become him sometimes)
Marved=<Nats (This one isnt smoking the same amount, Nats maybe slightly better rn, but both are still superstars rn. Least falloffs from both teams for each(except chronicle))
Victor<Chronicle (Chronicle is debatably the goat (not mine but has a good case), no-one else in each team other than Yay is and hes has a bad fall off. Chronicle)