SEN vs 100T rematch that we have waited to see bois
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
9
8
+1
|
7
7
+0
|
15
9
+6
|
6
9
-3
|
10
8
+2
|
nitr0
100T
|
8
10
-2
|
5
8
-3
|
4
10
-6
|
10
4
+6
|
2
6
-4
|
Asuna
100T
|
11
11
+0
|
4
9
-5
|
12
5
+7
|
13
13
+0
|
10
8
+2
|
steel
100T
|
12
8
+4
|
9
4
+5
|
10
12
-2
|
4
12
-8
|
10
6
+4
|
Hiko
100T
|
2
10
-8
|
10
6
+4
|
5
4
+1
|
5
8
-3
|
7
7
+0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
1
2
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
nitr0
100T
|
2
1
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
6
2
+4
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
2
4
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
steel
100T
|
5
3
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
2
6
-4
|
2
2
+0
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
nitr0
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
steel
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiko
100T
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
1
|
2
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
8
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
3
|
0
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
3
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
8
|
0
|
steel
100T
|
|
9
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
3
|
0
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
8
|
6
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
4
|
0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
6
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
2
|
1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
6
|
1
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
5
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
7
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
1
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
55
|
3
|
1
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
5
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
|
53
|
9
|
0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
3
2
+1
|
2
4
-2
|
4
4
+0
|
2
3
-1
|
5
4
+1
|
nitr0
100T
|
3
5
-2
|
1
4
-3
|
2
4
-2
|
5
2
+3
|
0
2
-2
|
Asuna
100T
|
6
5
+1
|
4
2
+2
|
6
3
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
5
6
-1
|
steel
100T
|
4
3
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
3
7
-4
|
2
5
-3
|
4
2
+2
|
Hiko
100T
|
1
5
-4
|
3
1
+2
|
2
3
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
1
3
-2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
nitr0
100T
|
2
1
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
2
0
+2
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
steel
100T
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
1
5
-4
|
1
1
+0
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
steel
100T
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiko
100T
|
|
2
Round 13
zombs
SicK
Round 16
TenZ
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
0
|
1
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
3
Round 9
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 10
SicK
TenZ
Round 22
TenZ
SicK
|
3
Round 5
TenZ
SicK
dapr
Round 16
dapr
SicK
ShahZaM
Round 21
zombs
TenZ
dapr
|
1
Round 19
TenZ
SicK
ShahZaM
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
2
|
0
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
|
1
Round 11
TenZ
dapr
SicK
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
3
|
0
|
steel
100T
|
|
6
Round 6
TenZ
SicK
Round 10
dapr
ShahZaM
Round 15
TenZ
ShahZaM
Round 17
zombs
ShahZaM
Round 20
zombs
TenZ
Round 23
TenZ
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
0
|
0
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
3
Round 3
TenZ
zombs
Round 18
TenZ
SicK
Round 22
dapr
ShahZaM
|
2
Round 1
ShahZaM
TenZ
SicK
Round 23
zombs
SicK
ShahZaM
|
|
|
1
Round 22
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
4
|
0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
2
Round 9
nitr0
Hiko
Round 14
steel
Asuna
|
2
Round 2
nitr0
Asuna
Hiko
Round 4
Asuna
nitr0
Hiko
|
1
Round 24
Asuna
nitr0
Ethan
Hiko
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
1
|
1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
3
Round 8
steel
Asuna
Round 13
steel
nitr0
Round 20
steel
Hiko
|
|
|
1
Round 7
steel
nitr0
Ethan
Hiko
Asuna
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
2
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
3
Round 13
Asuna
Hiko
Round 14
Ethan
Hiko
Round 22
Asuna
nitr0
|
1
Round 20
Asuna
Ethan
nitr0
|
|
|
1
Round 20
nitr0
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
1
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
Round 12
steel
Hiko
|
2
Round 1
Hiko
Ethan
nitr0
Round 6
steel
nitr0
Ethan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
1
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
2
Round 8
nitr0
Ethan
Round 23
nitr0
Ethan
|
1
Round 3
nitr0
Asuna
Hiko
|
|
|
1
Round 3
steel
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
5
|
0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
3
3
+0
|
4
1
+3
|
5
1
+4
|
3
2
+1
|
2
2
+0
|
nitr0
100T
|
4
0
+4
|
3
1
+2
|
2
3
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
Asuna
100T
|
2
1
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
2
1
+1
|
4
4
+0
|
2
2
+0
|
steel
100T
|
6
2
+4
|
3
1
+2
|
4
1
+3
|
1
4
-3
|
4
2
+2
|
Hiko
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
5
0
+5
|
2
0
+2
|
2
3
-1
|
4
3
+1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
2
1
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
steel
100T
|
3
1
+2
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
steel
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiko
100T
|
|
2
Round 2
SicK
dapr
Round 9
dapr
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
1
Round 12
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
1
|
0
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
2
Round 9
TenZ
zombs
Round 12
TenZ
ShahZaM
|
1
Round 13
ShahZaM
zombs
SicK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
1
|
0
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
2
Round 6
TenZ
dapr
Round 7
TenZ
dapr
|
|
1
Round 10
TenZ
SicK
dapr
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
3
|
0
|
steel
100T
|
|
1
Round 3
TenZ
ShahZaM
|
3
Round 4
TenZ
ShahZaM
SicK
Round 15
SicK
TenZ
dapr
Round 16
dapr
TenZ
SicK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
3
|
0
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
2
Round 2
ShahZaM
TenZ
Round 3
SicK
dapr
|
3
Round 8
zombs
TenZ
dapr
Round 11
zombs
ShahZaM
SicK
Round 14
SicK
TenZ
dapr
|
|
|
1
Round 2
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
0
|
0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
1
Round 8
Hiko
steel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
3
Round 5
nitr0
Asuna
Round 12
nitr0
steel
Round 16
nitr0
Ethan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
0
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
2
Round 1
steel
Hiko
Round 11
Asuna
nitr0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
Round 1
Asuna
nitr0
|
|
2
Round 2
Asuna
steel
Hiko
Ethan
zombs
Round 6
Asuna
steel
nitr0
Hiko
|
|
|
1
Round 6
nitr0
Hiko
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
1
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
0
|
0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
3
3
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
6
4
+2
|
1
4
-3
|
3
2
+1
|
nitr0
100T
|
1
5
-4
|
1
3
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
2
0
+2
|
0
3
-3
|
Asuna
100T
|
3
5
-2
|
0
5
-5
|
4
1
+3
|
6
5
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
steel
100T
|
2
3
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
3
4
-1
|
1
3
-2
|
2
2
+0
|
Hiko
100T
|
1
4
-3
|
2
5
-3
|
1
1
+0
|
0
3
-3
|
2
1
+1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
2
1
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
2
2
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
steel
100T
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
dapr
SEN
|
SicK
SEN
|
zombs
SEN
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
steel
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
0
|
1
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
3
Round 1
SicK
zombs
Round 7
SicK
ShahZaM
Round 10
SicK
TenZ
|
1
Round 16
TenZ
SicK
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
0
|
0
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
1
Round 16
zombs
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
2
|
0
|
steel
100T
|
|
2
Round 12
ShahZaM
SicK
Round 14
SicK
TenZ
|
1
Round 15
ShahZaM
SicK
dapr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
0
|
0
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
3
Round 4
SicK
ShahZaM
Round 9
TenZ
SicK
Round 12
dapr
TenZ
|
1
Round 8
ShahZaM
SicK
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
0
|
0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
3
Round 3
Ethan
Hiko
Round 11
Asuna
nitr0
Round 12
Asuna
nitr0
|
3
Round 9
Asuna
Hiko
Asuna
Round 13
Ethan
nitr0
Hiko
Round 17
steel
nitr0
Hiko
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
1
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
1
Round 9
nitr0
steel
Ethan
|
|
|
1
Round 9
Ethan
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
3
|
0
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
2
Round 5
steel
nitr0
Round 14
steel
nitr0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
0
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
Round 4
Asuna
Ethan
Round 11
steel
Hiko
|
2
Round 7
Asuna
Hiko
steel
Round 12
steel
Hiko
Ethan
zombs
|
|
|
|
1
Round 12
Ethan
steel
|
|
|
|
60
|
2
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
Round 1
Asuna
nitr0
Round 5
Asuna
Hiko
Round 7
nitr0
Ethan
|
2
Round 2
Ethan
steel
Hiko
Round 6
Asuna
Hiko
nitr0
|
|
|
1
Round 5
Hiko
|
|
1
Round 2
Ethan
steel
Hiko
|
|
|
72
|
4
|
0
|
Think it should be a great rivalry for NA scene. If someone actually hates the either team they're taking this a bit too serious lol, it's a game relax. But if this could become something like NA's Fnatic vs NiP in CSGO, where there is a massive rivalry from both teams, should be fun for both sides. Hope the life time series between the two team can be competitive.
I've been looking at both teams and Sentinels have been looking shaky. The whole team is a unit and in terms of raw aim and ability usage they are damn good. I feel they can out aim 100t. 100 thieves in my opinion has more strategy, and they play smarter, and they've played great, but I sincerely think the line up today on icebox wasn't it. Also Ethan underperformed on both maps today. If both teams are locked in I think 100t will take it 2-1 but then again Sick and TenZ are wild cards tbh.
If you're gonna compare the teams player for player (which is definitely a braindead and flat out wrong way of analyzing), at least make the correct player comparisons...
You should be comparing:
steel with dapr - lurk/sentinel
asuna with sick - entry
nitro with zombs - smoke
hiko with shahz - support/sova
tenz and ethan aren't really comparable...
Even my comparison is flawed, but it shows how stupid player to player comparisons are in a team game as not all teams play the game the same way.
You just said Asuna is better than TenZ, Steel is better than Shazham, Hiko is apparently equal to Dapr, Nitro is somehow equal to SicK lmao and Ethan is better than Zombs which I can kind of see but did I read that correctly because if I did you're a dumbass
Why are you comparing people with different roles and why are your comparisons so off
Yeah I mean there's no perfect way to compare the two teams since the teams have very different styles. Only think he needs to change is that Asuna = TenZ (Asuna prolly more useful overall but we'll just put this) and Steel < Shahzam. Maybe Hiko < dapr but since the pool of sentinels in NA is so much worse than the pool of Sovas its hard to say.
lets get one thing correct shahzam is NOT the best igl boys, nor is steel, both of them do not have exceptional mid round calling. FNS is so far the most consistent mid round caller. even vanity but yeah sen heavily depend on anti stratting. the have goo d defense setups but mid rounf calling is what differentiates IGL's and tier 1 level.
almost losing first round is not such a big point to say fns is not the best and i agree, that is always there, but this is what makes a top tier team the best. they are A SOLID team they have an idea of how they wanna play , and they do it pretty well. if they make iceland with lower bracket i might even even go as far as calling theem best team in NA. Cuz sentinels doees not have that tactical depth. Just imagine having sick, dapr, tenz talent on the same team and not being the best in the world???????????????? that's too much talent and if u have a great igl i think it could unlock so much more potential imo as a team.
Its About to go Down.....Lez go Guys One thing im so excited is NA, Brazil, Latam & Korea better than EU lets be honest this is not CSGO boys This is V A L O R A N T... if u say same thing..So Do u ever seen a hot character on cs probably not and a character updraft on u and shooting 100% accuracy Blade then rage bcuz it 1 tap u probably not.... Do CSGO have a queen of suckss probably not... And u never get door stuck.. unless u get a good suck....LuL...Fcking breeze Mate