4

The Transitive Property of Inequality

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
YaysterBestOpNA

Today we saw a match between Team Andbox and Team Sentinels.
In this match we see TenZ and GOD YAYSTER go head to head.
Both of these player are OPs.

In this match we see GOD YAYSTER's team, Andbox, beat TenZ's team, Sentinels 2-0.
We also see GOD YAYSTER drop 52 kills and 175 ADR.
We see TenZ drop 45 kills, and 167 ADR.

This means, mathematically, GOD YAYSTER > TenZ.

This is not all however.

Many people consider either TenZ or WARDELL to the best OPs in Northern America.

To be the best means that you are better than all other OPs, meaning that P* > ALL where ALL is the set {P₀ ... Pₙ} representing all OPers in Northern America.

Looking at both players stats, we can see that TenZ has a slight edge over WARDELL in ACS, KD, KPR and APR, while WARDELL leads in ADR.
At best, we can say that WARDELL is on par with TenZ. At worst we can say he is slightly inferior. i.e Tenz ≥ WARDELL

We can represent the common perspective as:
TenZ > ALL
or
WARDELL = TENZ > ALL
or
TenZ ≥ WARDELL > ALL

Now we introduce the transitive properties of inequality, which state:
"If a ≤ b and b ≤ c, then a ≤ c"
"If a ≤ b and b < c, then a < c."
and
"If a < b and b ≤ c, then a < c."

If we know
WARDELL ≤ TenZ
and
ALL < WARDELL
Then by the transitive property of inequality,
ALL < TenZ

Remember, we know from earlier that TenZ < GOD YAYSTER
So, if we know that ALL < TenZ
and TenZ < GOD YAYSTER

Then we can safely conclude that
ALL < GOD YAYSTER

or, in layman's terms:
GOD YAYSTER > ALL

Q.E.D.

#2
beb0p
8
Frags
+

waht de fack

#3
GetsystheGr8
3
Frags
+

If anything the IGLing of Vice made that team

#4
ItzYaBoiNUB
2
Frags
+

r/namechecksout

#5
kocunar
1
Frags
+

Happy for you or sorry that that happened

#6
sentence
3
Frags
+

I see a problem with your proof. Wardell > TenZ. If we change your proof with this new fact in, then we can conclude that GOD YAYSTER > ALL-WARDELL. However, if u include rifling then yes ur proof holds up, but the synopsis refers to OPers not Overall Fraggers, hence your proof does not hold.

#7
xdee1234
1
Frags
+

this mf really took time out of his day to write this out lmfao

#8
plas
1
Frags
+

TL;DR
yay is good at a videogame

#9
Seldruddd
-2
Frags
+

.

#10
beb0p
2
Frags
+

STOP PASTING THIS EVERYWHERE

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment