0

"FIre Again" Champs vid was garbage

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
james_reece

title

That shit was fucking horrible icl, does not even begin to compare to Die For you, mediocre really from a billion dollar company, you'd expect more than that dogshit

#2
charizard_123
28
Frags
+

Leeds owned you

#17
greedeetv
3
Frags
+

I found that funny and I’m a Chelsea fan

#3
KyedaeAtLAN
6
Frags
+

imagine you woke up and cared this much about a music video lmfao

#4
james_reece
-3
Frags
+

Thats exactly what happened kindo f, i woke up and checked YT feed, watched the vid, that shit was ass, i make a vlr post.

#7
KyedaeAtLAN
2
Frags
+

its not all that serious

#10
james_reece
-6
Frags
+

I know

#5
AdS
3
Frags
+

Nutab1e owns u

#6
Sushi_
0
Frags
+

Entirely subjective, i really liked the song and the video was excellent, though i can totally understand why people dislike

#8
Pocket
0
Frags
+

I still like the animation
11/10

#9
dourado
1
Frags
+

who

#11
AdS
3
Frags
+

Definition of who (Entry 1 of 2)
1: what or which person or persons —used as an interrogative
who was elected?
find out who they are
—used by speakers on all educational levels and by many reputable writers, though disapproved by some grammarians, as the object of a verb or a following preposition
who did I see but a Spanish lady
— Padraic Colum
do not know who the message is from
— G. K. Chesterton
2: the person or persons that : WHOEVER
3—used as a function word to introduce a relative clause —used especially in reference to persons
my father, who was a lawyer
but also in reference to groups
a generation who had known nothing but war
— R. B. West
or to animals
dogs who … fawn all over tramps
— Nigel Balchin
or to inanimate objects especially with the implication that the reference is really to a person
earlier sources who maintain a Davidic ancestry
— F. M. Cross
—used by speakers on all educational levels and by many reputable writers, though disapproved by some grammarians, as the object of a verb or a following preposition
a character who we are meant to pity
— The Times Literary Supplement (London)
as who
archaic : as one that : as if someone
as who should say
archaic : so to speak
who is who or who's who or who was who
: the identity of or the noteworthy facts about each of a number of persons

#16
dourado
-1
Frags
+

who

#12
nutab1e
3
Frags
+

Got high on weed for the first time, AMA
posted in Off Topic
Title, i feel gooofyyyyyyyyy idk if im high orn ot anymoreeeeeeeeee

#13
james_reece
-1
Frags
+

That was cringe as fuck from me im ngl but i was high and just felt like a child

#14
nutab1e
3
Frags
+

i feel gooofyyyyyyyyy

#15
james_reece
-2
Frags
+

Stop

#19
zardinez
-1
Frags
+

A man with his alts :(

#20
nutab1e
0
Frags
+

?

#18
KyedaeAtLAN
0
Frags
+

context?

#21
MerkFreeks
3
Frags
+

the music was definitely not as good as Die For You, but I think the video itself was cool.

Take this ratio

#22
Strafe7
0
Frags
+

Thats how I feel, the video is much better, but the song is not quite as good.

#23
Tanzim
0
Frags
+

i mean yea, for me both the vid and the song itself were worse than die for u

#24
WinterZ
0
Frags
+

imo Fire Again's animations were better than Die For You by a looooooooooooooong shot

in terms of the actual music Die For You is very consistent with the quality of lyrics and the beat goes pretty hard too. Fire Again also has an incredible beat but the lyrics aren't nearly as consistently good as Die For You. The highs in Fire Again are higher than the highs in Die For You but the lows in Fire Again are also lower than the lows in Die For You.

I like Fire Again marginally more than Die For You but thats just my opinion

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment