carried by import π
Flag: | Fiji |
Registered: | February 25, 2023 |
Last post: | May 25, 2024 at 5:52 AM |
Posts: | 591 |
carried by import π
And? Are you implying that Chinese people only belong to Asia? By your logic, I can say that all Chinese people belong to China so China is the superior region out of them all.
If only Japanese people could be good at games instead of making cartoons
Blud forget their team got 2-0 by an APAC team
https://www.vlr.gg/220446/team-liquid-vs-evil-geniuses-champions-tour-2023-masters-tokyo-ubsf
https://www.vlr.gg/220451/team-liquid-vs-nrg-esports-champions-tour-2023-masters-tokyo-lr2
π€« Lost to NA twice
Japan in fps games and moba games
Heroic complaining about valorant when their team cheated in cs πΉπΉπΉπΉ
"Got super lucky" proceed to get 13-5 π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
Can't give a damn about him being from EMEA . Shit is shit
he got booted out of c9 cause of his huge salary request
"A star (yay) is supposed to carry. A support (Leo) is not supposed to." now A "Star" player should be a duelist π Average vlr.gg user ability to make a comprehensible argument
You're contradicting again , bro you literally just say that "Yes, they are." ππππππππ aight I ain't replying anymore. You're literally moving goal posts to fit your argument
Lmao maybe try reading my sentence instead of being a classic tiktok brainrot user who can't read few sentences. I'm not comparing YAY with LEO , I'm providing a COUNTER EXAMPLE to that guy who is claiming that " A STAR PLAYER SHOULD CARRY A TEAM REGARDLESS OF THE CONDITIONS" .
Bro you said "Leo is support player" so he can't be counted as a star player as you replied to my comment by saying ""A star (yay) is supposed to carry. A SUPPORT (Leo) is not supposed to." And now you're saying Nats, chronicle and alfjaer can also be counted as a star player as "they perform well on their roles" . So why are you against my argument that Leo should carry his team regardless of his role and who is he matching up with as now he's a "Star" player in fnatic. ? Not to mention your whole argument is about How a "Star" player should be able to carry a team regardless of the conditions. So again to repeat by YOUR LOGIC LEO SHOULD BE CARRYING GUILD REGARDLESS OF HIS ROLE NOR MATCH UP AS A "STAR PLAYER" AS YOU STATED SHOULD CARRY A TEAM REGARDLESS OF THE CONDITIONS" hope this ease your time reading
But you said "A star (yay) is supposed to carry. A SUPPORT (Leo) is not supposed to." so you're contradicting yourself ? And so my point about LEO was also correct right ? ππππππππππ Stop embarrassing yourself
Bro have you seen the games that he played using jett as well, dude can't hit his shots most of the time
So Nats, Chronicle and alfjaer are not star players right as they are support players
A "Star player" is a good player . You can't be garbage and be counted as a "Star player"
Read properly before replying. No one is comparing Leo with Yay
Maybe improve your reading comprehension as you're clearly claiming that "A good player" should carry a team regardless of any circumstance. I don't care if Leo is a support player or he's playing against a good team because by your logic he should still carry them as he is a "good player"
Doesn't matter , if he's a good player regardless of the team he is playing against he should have perform well because by your logic a "GOOD player" should carry a team regardless of any circumstances
Lmao, so by your logic Leo is also an overrated player right ? Because he mostly have low kda in Guild . There is difference between you performing bad in a Team that have good players and IGL than a Team with NO IGL nor "Good" as most of them are at best decent players.
So by your logic you're saying CGRS is a good player as well right as he always "get much info"
Can't carry 4 garbage players with no igl by yourself
NRG 2-0 PRX
Blud if you wanna use "EMEA" as a comparison then you gotta use "AMERICAS" in which "AMERICAS" 1 champion
Only thing EMEA is winning is a free ticket to go back after flopping
π€―omg really !!!???????? π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―no way π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―π€―
Um yes? Have you ever watch their games critically instead of fanboying boaster ? And who is the "everyone" vlr.gg users ? Lmao if that's your point you're the one being dumb here. And like I said , what so call "analysts" says are not always true as they are just your usual casual valorant player .
posted 5 hours ago β edited 3 minutes ago ππ
Says you lil bro , called you out and now you're changing the meaning of your original comment aye ππ
Then why did you proceed to write this sentence ? "DFME took a map off of t1 and geng, I am sure these 3 teams cant." if you're saying those 3 teams are equally as bad as DFM ?
No you said "FENNEL, JDT, and SCARZ" are equally bad" but not included DFM which comes off as you're saying those 3 teams are worser than DFM
Well a chair "intended purpose" is purely subjective and to say a chair is "purely designed for sitting" is also purely subject as I can just bring a counter example of a guy designing a chair for the purpose of putting stuff on it or even doing other stuff with it other then sitting. What makes a "Definition" is one which is always true and have no contradiction that is counter examples.
I mean a table can also be designed for sitting , most people do occasionally sit on the table which makes it a sort of a chair. And some people do also place their item for example their bags on the chair and sometimes their books which could also function as table. So to say a chair is solely designed for sitting and a table solely designed for placing item is already not true. And definition from dictionary are not "Definite definitions"
So a table with four leg can be considered a chair as well right ? As it's a furniture and a person can sit on. So a table can become a chair ? Then what makes a table a table and not a chair ?
It's a simple question , please define me what a "chair" is .
"and u are a piss random" damn lil bro there's no need to project your insecurities