vooooooooooooooooooooooop
Flag: Fiji
Registered: February 25, 2023
Last post: May 25, 2024 at 5:52 AM
Posts: 591
1 •• 6 7 8 9 10 11

carried by import πŸ˜‚

posted 11 months ago

πŸ’€Even 4 imports can't save india

posted 11 months ago

And? Are you implying that Chinese people only belong to Asia? By your logic, I can say that all Chinese people belong to China so China is the superior region out of them all.

posted 11 months ago

If only Japanese people could be good at games instead of making cartoons

posted 11 months ago

Japan in fps games and moba games

posted 11 months ago

nah he reuniting with steel

posted 11 months ago

blud projecting

posted 11 months ago

Heroic complaining about valorant when their team cheated in cs 😹😹😹😹

posted 11 months ago

Fns being fns

posted 11 months ago

"Got super lucky" proceed to get 13-5 🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣

posted 11 months ago

Still doesn't change the fact that he's bad

posted 11 months ago

πŸ₯±

posted 11 months ago

Can't give a damn about him being from EMEA . Shit is shit

posted 11 months ago

wouldn't want another pacific team getting grouped

posted 11 months ago

he got booted out of c9 cause of his huge salary request

posted 11 months ago

"A star (yay) is supposed to carry. A support (Leo) is not supposed to." now A "Star" player should be a duelist πŸ˜‚ Average vlr.gg user ability to make a comprehensible argument

posted 11 months ago

You're contradicting again , bro you literally just say that "Yes, they are." πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ aight I ain't replying anymore. You're literally moving goal posts to fit your argument

posted 11 months ago

Lmao maybe try reading my sentence instead of being a classic tiktok brainrot user who can't read few sentences. I'm not comparing YAY with LEO , I'm providing a COUNTER EXAMPLE to that guy who is claiming that " A STAR PLAYER SHOULD CARRY A TEAM REGARDLESS OF THE CONDITIONS" .

posted 11 months ago

Bro you said "Leo is support player" so he can't be counted as a star player as you replied to my comment by saying ""A star (yay) is supposed to carry. A SUPPORT (Leo) is not supposed to." And now you're saying Nats, chronicle and alfjaer can also be counted as a star player as "they perform well on their roles" . So why are you against my argument that Leo should carry his team regardless of his role and who is he matching up with as now he's a "Star" player in fnatic. ? Not to mention your whole argument is about How a "Star" player should be able to carry a team regardless of the conditions. So again to repeat by YOUR LOGIC LEO SHOULD BE CARRYING GUILD REGARDLESS OF HIS ROLE NOR MATCH UP AS A "STAR PLAYER" AS YOU STATED SHOULD CARRY A TEAM REGARDLESS OF THE CONDITIONS" hope this ease your time reading

posted 11 months ago

But you said "A star (yay) is supposed to carry. A SUPPORT (Leo) is not supposed to." so you're contradicting yourself ? And so my point about LEO was also correct right ? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Stop embarrassing yourself

posted 11 months ago

Bro have you seen the games that he played using jett as well, dude can't hit his shots most of the time

posted 11 months ago

So Nats, Chronicle and alfjaer are not star players right as they are support players

posted 11 months ago

A "Star player" is a good player . You can't be garbage and be counted as a "Star player"

posted 11 months ago

Read properly before replying. No one is comparing Leo with Yay

posted 11 months ago

Maybe improve your reading comprehension as you're clearly claiming that "A good player" should carry a team regardless of any circumstance. I don't care if Leo is a support player or he's playing against a good team because by your logic he should still carry them as he is a "good player"

posted 11 months ago

Nice try changing the subject

posted 11 months ago

Doesn't matter , if he's a good player regardless of the team he is playing against he should have perform well because by your logic a "GOOD player" should carry a team regardless of any circumstances

posted 11 months ago

Lmao, so by your logic Leo is also an overrated player right ? Because he mostly have low kda in Guild . There is difference between you performing bad in a Team that have good players and IGL than a Team with NO IGL nor "Good" as most of them are at best decent players.

posted 11 months ago

So by your logic you're saying CGRS is a good player as well right as he always "get much info"

posted 11 months ago

Can't carry 4 garbage players with no igl by yourself

posted 11 months ago

Ardiis is gone and yay is coming back .

posted 11 months ago

Yay would get 20+ kills on bind

posted 11 months ago

Blud if you wanna use "EMEA" as a comparison then you gotta use "AMERICAS" in which "AMERICAS" 1 champion

posted 11 months ago

name checks out

posted about a year ago

Only thing EMEA is winning is a free ticket to go back after flopping

posted about a year ago

🀯omg really !!!???????? 🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯no way 🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯🀯

posted about a year ago

Um yes? Have you ever watch their games critically instead of fanboying boaster ? And who is the "everyone" vlr.gg users ? Lmao if that's your point you're the one being dumb here. And like I said , what so call "analysts" says are not always true as they are just your usual casual valorant player .

posted about a year ago

posted 5 hours ago β‹… edited 3 minutes ago πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

posted about a year ago

Says you lil bro , called you out and now you're changing the meaning of your original comment aye πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

posted about a year ago

Then why did you proceed to write this sentence ? "DFME took a map off of t1 and geng, I am sure these 3 teams cant." if you're saying those 3 teams are equally as bad as DFM ?

posted about a year ago

No you said "FENNEL, JDT, and SCARZ" are equally bad" but not included DFM which comes off as you're saying those 3 teams are worser than DFM

posted about a year ago

Well a chair "intended purpose" is purely subjective and to say a chair is "purely designed for sitting" is also purely subject as I can just bring a counter example of a guy designing a chair for the purpose of putting stuff on it or even doing other stuff with it other then sitting. What makes a "Definition" is one which is always true and have no contradiction that is counter examples.

posted about a year ago

I mean a table can also be designed for sitting , most people do occasionally sit on the table which makes it a sort of a chair. And some people do also place their item for example their bags on the chair and sometimes their books which could also function as table. So to say a chair is solely designed for sitting and a table solely designed for placing item is already not true. And definition from dictionary are not "Definite definitions"

posted about a year ago

So a table with four leg can be considered a chair as well right ? As it's a furniture and a person can sit on. So a table can become a chair ? Then what makes a table a table and not a chair ?

posted about a year ago

It's a simple question , please define me what a "chair" is .

posted about a year ago

because fun

posted about a year ago

"and u are a piss random" damn lil bro there's no need to project your insecurities

posted about a year ago
1 •• 6 7 8 9 10 11