When it comes to pr, orgs and players want to avoid confrontation, meaning that they intentionally boil things down to put themselves at blame instead of others. As you said, public statements dont always give a true situation. the best we can do is use context clues to see who gives the most believable picture. xeta and t1's statements put themselves responsible, vanity's response puts c9's roster as responsible, but c9 ceo's statements put xeta and autumn responsible. Because of the potential ramifications, c9's ceo's response would be the only actual harmful lie.
- Xeta and t1 telling the complete truth: t1 as an org offer more benefits or market to xeta/autumn, something that xeta/autumn are willing to sacrifice competition for (crazy to me considering they immigrated all the way to NA)
- vanity is telling the truth: vanity doesn't want to go to copenhagen, can also indicate a potential move to kr.
- C9 ceo is telling truth: t1 allows more benefits/market to xeta/autumn, can also indicate a potential move to kr.
It is probably a mix of all of these things with little fabrications sprinkled around. Everything boiled down, i believe that xeta and autumn initiated the trade, and you believe that the rest of c9 initiated the trade, both of which we will never confirm. We have little information, and I would put my money that each org and player wants to do what's best for them.