riot always clumps regions on the same side of the bracket.

g2 ( if they get na)

more likely over falcons rather than big

most likely no

issue with valorant is we dont really know if its an upset.
teams play little to no games between some tournaments and the meta changes too much to have a team solidifying as number 1.

but yeah the diversity is defo better in valorant

though rito did leave out mongolia rip

pewdiepie is definitely number 1 for influence.
not all his influence is good but he was the leading figure in alot of the early content styles.

explain what happened on breeze then

hltv frog?

fpx not good at trading. rely on getting picks too much.

Order disbanded no?

Wouldn't happen. No point either they would lose revenue

Valorant will only die if riot fucks up.
Don't really see any new competition coming taking away the player base

thats not very reasonable of you

who the hell are the ghostbusters

tomorrow?

I feel like fpx is very similar to kru, map pool wise. but just slightly better.
not confident in fnatic though I think if they replicate what they were doing on breeze on other maps they can win.
Liquid look good but prx could always turn up on the day and just win

honestly it will most likely only be fpx

there were 2 before the xset win

nope

every region shit talks it is how it is

we gotta see past this region dispute and come together and realise riot games rigs this shit

exact same shit happened last masters with emea.

Buzz and king have highest first kill percent

mazin wtf

shit always happens. they try to let different regions have a run in the tournament

no? they are on the opposite side of the bracket

xset vs 100t would be hype.
Lev vs loud aswell

you saying you cant divide numbers?

For franchising

Americas: 9-5
EMEA: 3-3
ASIA:4-7

You average 29.56 posts per day.
go outside maybe?

that envy lost to x10 was the most random shit

scrimbux is useless half the time though.
also less counter strating cause teams have little to none maps played.
ironically being better at masters just hurts you into champs

its not really about the players though. the roster will most likely get picked up regardless.

think the issue is how little each team play between tournaments its hard to know.
oh well i like an upset

i dont think they make franchising. unironically they dont have that many fans + not entirely sure they that financial secure (correct me if im wrong)

you started to do what???????

wp ggs
some close games and some decent valo

the only maybe one is optic's.
though they wouldve likely won anyways

uh oh

dephh will carry the eu banner

their trading is so bad.
too much reliance on getting unanswered picks/multi kills.

not looking good bruv

yes, fnatic was 2nd aswell

good lord

W
Eric highest dpr in gold!

maybe? the majority of all posts on vlr are reactionary.
is it more fun? idk
most of the time its just a "predictive" post where people then bring up after the wrong to either act smart or shit on whoever posted it

its xset map pick. so its still possible

asking vlr to not be reactionary is like asking a dog not to bark

hes +1 wtf

br csgo is pretty healthy rn so i dont think they would switch over.

Zews is inactive rn. though i dont think he would come

Personally I think they should invite every team that gets over a certain amount of points and then an lcq for every region.
So the top 12 teams by points should get an invite
And then lcq like normal

If this happened then the following teams would get invited:

Emea: FPX, FNATIC,G2,GUILD
NA: OPTIC
BR: LOUD
JPN: ZETA
KR: DRX
APAC: PRX, XRX
LATAM: LEV KRU

However this isnt entirely fair as emea gets more slots for masters.
just an idea though

• another issue is the fact that a team could qualify based on 1 performance alone