It's unfair to dismiss the work of James simply because he's in the early stages of his career and primarily posts scrim results. His contributions are valuable in their own way, and with time and effort, he will undoubtedly develop a more comprehensive set of sources. That said, it's equally unjust to criticize George and Eutalyx, who have earned their reputations and connections through hard work. They too started from the bottom and climbed their way up; their success should not be trivialized to elevate someone who has yet to establish himself.
the point in my second paragraph still stands, ur chatgpt article doesnt do a thing to change my mind