Klick1108
Country: Vietnam
Registered: May 23, 2023
Last post: August 26, 2023 at 8:33 PM
Posts: 263
1 2 3 4 5 6

ROMAIWHO???

posted 9 months ago

as a EU user i have to admit that NRG clears every team from my region. truth hurts

posted 9 months ago

PRX CLEARS!

Getting third with 6th man playing!

posted 9 months ago

king keznit will surprise the world

posted 9 months ago

CHINA OWNS YOU

posted 9 months ago

You'll be shocked when you notice that you overdosed on copium today

posted 9 months ago

I'd be shocked if more than 10 ppl knew FUT for being anything other than getting last at champs with NAVI

posted 9 months ago

they are an EU team, but FNC is superior. NOT EU.

Let us not forget that TL and NAVI got bot 2 in masters

posted 9 months ago

I hope your pillow is warm

posted 9 months ago

wtf is this logic...

EG AND NRG= EU SINCE WE HAVE ARDIIS AND DEMON1 🤔🤔🤔

posted 9 months ago

yes, and i'm going to rule the world

posted 9 months ago

AHAHAHAHAHAAHAH LOSING TO SEN WHO'S IGL IS MARVED!

MARVED!

posted 9 months ago

yeah that's why it's in caps ya doink...

fake falgger... imagine

if you are from the states, I pray for your downfall

posted 9 months ago

FNC* you mean

FNC =/= EU

delulu

posted 9 months ago

HAHAHAHA ZETA HAHAHAHAHA

Average 100T fan

posted 9 months ago

YEAH DUDE, and as a EMEA user, I have to admit that NAVI gets grouped from every team in champs. truth hurts

imagine dropping a map to KC

posted 9 months ago

Do yall like your job: Kinda

What do you do: work in a lab as a quality control chemist (make sure things are in an acceptable range ie. viscosity, hardness, melting point)

posted 9 months ago

grouped

posted 9 months ago

I'd be shocked if any EMEA teams other than FNC don't get grouped

posted 9 months ago

PRX with something >

posted 9 months ago

FNC not winning

posted 9 months ago

Nah, s0men owns TL and NAVI

posted 9 months ago

Europe?

posted 9 months ago

Liquid and NAVI being below NRG and EG 🤡🤡

posted 9 months ago

Guys if EU stays in Valorant, what would happen to our teams? What you saying is silly, as EU, we only have 1 team (winning shows how bad the rest of our teams are) even though we have over 2x the amount of players compared to NA, we still all are dog at the game (other than FNC). We all get destroyed (other than FNC), and can't do anything without them. 2 NA teams got into top 4 at masters, while we only got 1 (FNC...) 😫😫. If EU was kicked, it would be better for the game since nobody wants to watch teams like BOTVI play 🤡🤡

posted 9 months ago

ong

posted 9 months ago

you mean FNC > NA *

posted 9 months ago

Doesn't this go both ways?

EU team wins -> We are the best region in the world even though all of their other teams got knocked out without winning a game (see Tokyo)
NA team wins -> Fluke
When NA dominates: dead silence till next event (been a minute, but still...)

posted 9 months ago

Fluke? Map 3 was a blow out

TL clears LOUD tho

posted 9 months ago

fr, waiting for kang kang masterclass

posted 9 months ago

nah, Astra >

posted 9 months ago

Reyna= not that good in pro play (unless you're prx)
Pheonix= situational (pearl)
yoru= yoru

posted 9 months ago

s0men on top!

posted 9 months ago

COPE haha sure... whatever floats ur boat lil bro.

Lesser evil > greater evil = fine...

YEAH DUDE, JUSTIFIED! It's not justified. Idk what ur waffling about

posted 9 months ago

Corsair HS80

posted 9 months ago

MORON... K

First off: The Japanese were negotiating a conditional surrendering regarding the safety of the EMPEROR AND THE IMPERIAL PARTY. after the "unconditional surrender" their conditions regarding the protection of the EMPEROR AND IMPERIAL PARTY were still fulfilled.

WHO TF SAID ANYTHING ABOUT KYOTO LMFAOOO. LIL BRO'S VOICES ARE ACTIN UP! MORON!

I said: Nagasaki and Hiroshima: NAGASAKI AND HIROSHIMA

The one that was planned + had military significance but wasn't bombed in the end was Kokura NOT KYOTO MORON

posted 9 months ago

and what are these estimates of 10 million based on? Did the sources explain? Because there are also some reputable sources saying that it is an overestimate.

Also, it was 90% civilians... It missed the military areas in Hiroshima... Did Nagasaki have military significance? Sure. Did Hiroshima... no...

Dead to radiation vs the lasting effects also have to be taken into account.

Nuking isn't justified, and should not be justified. "saving lives" : kill children and civilians rather than soldiers who volunteered to fight...

posted 9 months ago

My mistake, but we also need to take into account that Hiroshima was 90% civilians, and that the 10% of militants weren't even effected.

To justify nukes based on the fact that it is "better" than fire-bombings does not change a thing... Both are bad. Is one worse? Yes. Does that mean that the other thing is justified? No.

You can't justify killing civilians.

posted 9 months ago

Hiroshima: "Although Hiroshima contained some military-related industrial facilities—an army headquarters and troop-loading docks—the vibrant city of over a quarter of a million men, women and children was hardly “a military base.” Indeed, less than 10 percent of the individuals killed on Aug. 6, 1945, were Japanese military personnel ...More than 70,000 men, women and children were killed immediately. In a cruel irony, the munitions factories on the periphery of the city were left largely unscathed." -https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/hiroshima-and-myths-military-targets-and-unconditional-surrender

Also, Nagasaki wasn't even the intended target. It was Kokura which was an actual military city. Nagasaki had some importance, but compared to Kokura, it was nothing. Also, why not the capital or some other big military cities? Because they wanted to kill as many people as possible even if that meant civilians.

Regarding estimates of deaths: "In addition to those killed instantly, many died over the next year of severe burns and radiation sickness. Significant numbers of people also died later from cancer and related diseases, and fatal birth defects may have been caused by the radiation." https://www.britannica.com/topic/Trumans-decision-to-use-the-bomb-712569/End-game

They were chosen because they had little damage done by the firebombing and the bombing runs conducted prior in the war.

posted 9 months ago

How Yawnster still not added to the list

posted 9 months ago

meyournightmare
Country: United Kingdom
Registered: June 7, 2022
Last post: July 25, 2023 at 9:31 AM
Posts: 6470

posted 9 months ago

Not japan thinking of surrendering even before the nukes... (read the Manhattan project from the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).

posted 9 months ago

The war was about to end... Japan was on the brink of collapse, and many members of the government wanted to surrender, meaning that the nuke was not necessary (according to the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

I think that you need to do some more research.

If you don't know: Hiroshima and Nagasaki are both civilian cities. They had no military significance at all. They got chosen because the other cities were heavily bombed compared to these ones.

posted 9 months ago

s0men owns you

posted 9 months ago

NRG owns TL and BOTVI

posted 9 months ago

Even if FNC didn't win Masters...

None of the EMEA teams would make it past groups

Botvi is trash + dropped a map to KC
TL can't win even with 2 international winners
Giants would lose against OR esports 🤣🤣🤣

Best region my ass 😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹

posted 9 months ago

Do EMEA rats keep on forgetting that their dogshit charity leauge region only has one good team in nearly 2 years? 😹

How does this smokespam region keep on talking the most with the worst teams in franchised 😭😭😭🕊️😭😭

posted 9 months ago

Forgot Congo1

posted 9 months ago

1 team regions shouldn't either

posted 9 months ago

Baguette munching bum talking why?

posted 9 months ago
1 2 3 4 5 6