Found this clip randomly on YT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JiBLNtW6Ms

I know since it's only a clip and I don't watch the full stream. But content-wise surely it must be a joke right?
Since it's almost impossible for him too to play in pro play until berlin start.
But if it's true, TSM will become good. They get a hand on one of the best sova in NA.

More than anything, I think that kyedae expression from that clutch is priceless. That was one meme-able for sure.

Why these 2 teams meet so early,
Aren't they the best 2 team in BR rn?

Yeah, as fas as I remember he's already bait since he still use the RoadRunneR name.
Legendary indeed especially after he got mention from cned, lmao

(づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ Glad you like our service,

-

(づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ Glad you like our service,

Bruh, I know you bait.
But everytime you bait, your logic and reasoning is sometimes good, so its fun to see you bait.
But about this one, shahz ever talk about how important zombs is. He said that he is the anchor of the team,
According to shahz in his stream, he said that zombs is always defending his position while keep check the situation on the map. So while the other SEN boys goes all out, he is the one who remind everyone about the last seen enemy and about abilities while do his role as smoker.
Something like that won't be able to seen in match or even stats. But only your team know, so you can't judge player by their performance and stats. Especially in high level team.

Hey guys, your time traveler service is here.
Here's the score from the future.

Thank me later!

ACEND 1 - 3 GUILD

Hi guys,
I'm from the future. Thank me later.

1. gtn
2. gtn
3. gtn
4. gtn
5. gtn
6. gtn
7. gtn
8. gtn
9. gtn
10. gtn
11. gtn
12. gtn
13. gtn
14. gtn
15. gtn
16. Brimstone gaming - dynamic
17. Brimstone gaming - reach
18. Brimstone gaming - plat1num
19. Brimstone gaming - fletcher
20. Brimstone gaming - Strafe

F

That's why you need to be prepared mentality when enter this forum.
There can only be 2 type of people that dominate this forum. The baiter, and the delusional fans.
The normal who speak the truth will always get bullied by those two.

Because other EMEA teams are so weak that they can't even go in Iceland so FNC and TL give them first pass to playoff so they can get bighead. And in the end they won't even qualify for berlin.

Why? Because I like FNC and TL. And they're more stronger than other EMEA teams.

Your welcome.

¿Quién es Wardell? Who is Wardell?
En geografía, mi mundo. His awesomeness not limited to geographic bounds.
En historia, mi rey. In history he is the king who unite us all.
En matemáticas, mi solución. Mathematically he is the formula to solve any problem
En biología, mi medicina. Biology he is the Father to us all
En mitología, mi dios. His name always out there in all Mythology story
En astronomía, mi universo. Astronomically he is the one who create the universe
Para el ciego, la luz. He is the light to guide us all
Para el hambriento, el pan. He is the salvation in this broken world
Para mí, mi todo. He is the gtn

If that already makes you feels weird try go out to real life stop stuck at your monitor, so much something more weird out there.
Expand your horizon boy,

Ploo ofc. She has the biggest weapon of all valorant female player.
Her vandal is around 2-3 times bigger than normal, It can 1 tap you instantly.

I agree with you but as good as your theory is, they need to prove it first.
Just like shahz talk about c9b is the most overrated team because they never won anything but people keep telling they're something so big. And like when he talk about TSM too. The point is, They need to prove it first.

Even I feel like this too, since before Reykjavik I think 100T is very2 strong team.
But when you say something like this without any real result since they never meet them directly or participate in same tournament as them, then this is just a child imagination.

Pretty big upset in EMEA bracket since FNC and TL out already.
I hope they can come back recover in Challenger 2.

You must be new son,
If you know his legend when still RoadRRunneR name, he is true legend.

(づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ Come back stronger!

cNed has better fanbase, TenZ has better team.

Why the hate to split.
It was one of easiest map for cypher. And as cypher main, this map doesn't need to remake.

Entry duelist is Phoenix is good for his playstyle IMO.

I hope it's just a bad day,
Pre-match interview scream said that he confident with his jett. But when play it isn't what we hope for.
I think if he wanna become the entry his best option is Phoenix.

This site become better and better,
Keep it up man! Good work and Thanks!

What a game. GG.
MVP should be Technical Pause.

Ah, I see. Make sense now.

663 replies,
G2 or FPX fanbase this big?

Best female pro = meL
Best female to simp = pokimane
Best female biological weapon = ploo

That's more make sense, I agree with you. If the winner or max 2 finalist automatic get spot for next master that's better format.

Unless we have another corona, I think it will be slightly different.
3 master and 1 championship.
Every master winner get spot in championship.
And make championship format a little different. That would be better.

Gtn > Brimstone Gaming >>supermassive wide gap>> NA>EU>KR+BR

I'm used to be stuck like you bro.
But someone told me to change left click to ads and right click to shoot
And believe it or not, it's effective.

Valo is my first fps game, i start from Iron and after around 1month become Silver.
But I never play rank again, last is when act 2 eps 2.
Now only play casual with friends/family

I'm from the future.
The score as right now is V1-100T (14-12) Breeze, (5-13) Ascent, (2-1) Bind
Yeah, the game is still LIVE, lemme watch first and I'll tell you when I'm back again from future.

Am I the only one thinking that TSM is great as it is. Their player composition isn't the best, but it doesn't need to change.
They just need more pro scene time. And they need to have a more stable performance at pro scene.
Because when I watch TSM sometime they play so good sometimes they play so bad. The inconsistent is just big.
It's like their mentality built not for competing at high level even they have high level skill.

Brimstone gaming testing new strat on these low level team so team like SEN, FNC, TL, V1, VKS, ACEND can copy it.

Lemme cry now, because I won't have time to care about such matter when that happen.

I cry,,, end.

That's not problem too. As long as the match is thrilling and exciting. No matter what happen to SEN is not really my prob.
I fans SEN just because I like their gameplay, that's all.
I'm not simple minded fanatic TSM fan like you boy, grow up a little.

soniqs, c9b, tsm, abx

Wow, this is good.
A little more realistic upset than mine, but since I wanna see 100T vs SEN in finals it's not match with mine.
If you make V1 win in the upper final, I think that's better.

Here the part 2

"You can't define "favored" as outcome-independent, because you cannot verify whether that team was actually favored or not and objectively measure the performance of the criterion. This is where you are going wrong. You are just asserting your criterion is "factual" without providing any empirical evidence."

What? Of course you can? If you have Sentinels vs Soniqs, Sentinels are the clear favourite, but its POSSIBLE that soniqs could win. Its not IMPOSSIBLE, its just HIGHLY unlikely. And again, as I have stated, its determined from match results that sentinels are the favourites. The criterion is factual, and I've explained how. There is no 'empirical evidence' involved here though either? You clearly do not understand what you are talking about. When people talk about things, they use logic, logic IS the root of facts, it IS what determines what is factual or not. I've logically and factually proven you wrong.

"The entire objective of saying whether a team is favored or not is to predict whether that team will be more likely to win or not. That is literally what you imply in your posts as well, you say it's an upset, that gen.g won, when you thought andbox were clearly favored prior to the game starting. So you had outcomes in your mind, an upset and an expected win. Just like sports betting websites have odds for how likely the bettors think each team is to win. These things can be measured and compared with success-rates."

Exactly, which team will be more likely to win. Andbox were OBJECTIVELY favoured to win, based on their results, they were factually the better team based on results before the match-up. Again, sports betting is not reliable as match results. Match results are ALWAYS factual and right for favoured matchups, sports betting is not always accurate.

"You said you cannot with certainty predict, which team can win at any given moment(which I agree with), but you said you can know which team is favored to win. This doesn't make sense, you cannot know either in this case, but you can make guesses to both based on your methods. If you knew, that a coin you are tossing is 1/3rd likely to hit tails and 2/3rd likely to hit heads, then knowing for certain the outcome of a single toss doesn't matter. You can make many tosses with that coin and measure which side it is more likely to land on and make a prediction with that data. In Valorant we don't know either, we can only make educated guesses as to which one it is through various methods which have a varying success rate, none of which are valid."

It does make sense, because any team can win at any given time. However, this does not change the objective fact that a certain team was FAVOURED to win, and MORE LIKELY to win. Your analogy makes no sense, if you knew that the coin is 2/3rd likely to hit heads then obviously heads would be FAVOURED and more LIKELY to be landed on. That is a fact, as that is the higher probability. Your analogy didn't prove your argument at all, and it's pretty sad, and funny, to think about the fact that you probably think it was clever; it wasn't. In valorant we definitely can factually know which team is more likely to win, based on previous results. I've used the same example multiple times, but you havent countered it because you know you cant, it is a logical factual example proving my argument right and directly proving you wrong. (Refer to sentinels vs soniqs)

"I suggest you come back to what you wrote here in five years and read it to yourself. It has no coherence. Sounds like something I would've written when I was 14 arguing on battle.net forums. So much of the words "factual, delusional, subjective, objective" without any coherence in their meaning. I can't respond to most of this, because it's just word salad and you're not actually understanding what I'm writing."

LMAO. So basically you're admitting to being an unintelligent, stubborn yet arrogant fool who cant admit he's wrong, even when factually proven wrong. Cool I guess. You can't respond to most of my argument because you know I'm right deep down, it's just pathetic to see your excuses and how hard you're coping with the fact you lost a debate. Idk why ur even making excuses, it's not that deep. You lost and got stomped in an internet debate. Just admit you took the L, lmao. I'm not making the predictions, because they have nothing to do with our argument.

Here the part 2

"You can't define "favored" as outcome-independent, because you cannot verify whether that team was actually favored or not and objectively measure the performance of the criterion. This is where you are going wrong. You are just asserting your criterion is "factual" without providing any empirical evidence."

What? Of course you can? If you have Sentinels vs Soniqs, Sentinels are the clear favourite, but its POSSIBLE that soniqs could win. Its not IMPOSSIBLE, its just HIGHLY unlikely. And again, as I have stated, its determined from match results that sentinels are the favourites. The criterion is factual, and I've explained how. There is no 'empirical evidence' involved here though either? You clearly do not understand what you are talking about. When people talk about things, they use logic, logic IS the root of facts, it IS what determines what is factual or not. I've logically and factually proven you wrong.

"The entire objective of saying whether a team is favored or not is to predict whether that team will be more likely to win or not. That is literally what you imply in your posts as well, you say it's an upset, that gen.g won, when you thought andbox were clearly favored prior to the game starting. So you had outcomes in your mind, an upset and an expected win. Just like sports betting websites have odds for how likely the bettors think each team is to win. These things can be measured and compared with success-rates."

Exactly, which team will be more likely to win. Andbox were OBJECTIVELY favoured to win, based on their results, they were factually the better team based on results before the match-up. Again, sports betting is not reliable as match results. Match results are ALWAYS factual and right for favoured matchups, sports betting is not always accurate.

"You said you cannot with certainty predict, which team can win at any given moment(which I agree with), but you said you can know which team is favored to win. This doesn't make sense, you cannot know either in this case, but you can make guesses to both based on your methods. If you knew, that a coin you are tossing is 1/3rd likely to hit tails and 2/3rd likely to hit heads, then knowing for certain the outcome of a single toss doesn't matter. You can make many tosses with that coin and measure which side it is more likely to land on and make a prediction with that data. In Valorant we don't know either, we can only make educated guesses as to which one it is through various methods which have a varying success rate, none of which are valid."

It does make sense, because any team can win at any given time. However, this does not change the objective fact that a certain team was FAVOURED to win, and MORE LIKELY to win. Your analogy makes no sense, if you knew that the coin is 2/3rd likely to hit heads then obviously heads would be FAVOURED and more LIKELY to be landed on. That is a fact, as that is the higher probability. Your analogy didn't prove your argument at all, and it's pretty sad, and funny, to think about the fact that you probably think it was clever; it wasn't. In valorant we definitely can factually know which team is more likely to win, based on previous results. I've used the same example multiple times, but you havent countered it because you know you cant, it is a logical factual example proving my argument right and directly proving you wrong. (Refer to sentinels vs soniqs)

"I suggest you come back to what you wrote here in five years and read it to yourself. It has no coherence. Sounds like something I would've written when I was 14 arguing on battle.net forums. So much of the words "factual, delusional, subjective, objective" without any coherence in their meaning. I can't respond to most of this, because it's just word salad and you're not actually understanding what I'm writing."

LMAO. So basically you're admitting to being an unintelligent, stubborn yet arrogant fool who cant admit he's wrong, even when factually proven wrong. Cool I guess. You can't respond to most of my argument because you know I'm right deep down, it's just pathetic to see your excuses and how hard you're coping with the fact you lost a debate. Idk why ur even making excuses, it's not that deep. You lost and got stomped in an internet debate. Just admit you took the L, lmao. I'm not making the predictions, because they have nothing to do with our argument.

Wtf, part 2.
The war of who can make the longest essay is still going on.
Damn, what an epic fight.

https://www.vlr.gg/pickem/8f127296