NRG Esports vs. 100 Thieves | Champions Tour North America Stage 2: Challengers | Group Stage | Valorant match

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
tex NRG	1.40 1.53 1.25	294 329 254	23 14 9	/ 14 7 7 /	2 0 2	+9 +7 +2	73% 75% 70%	185 213 150	46% 48% 42%	6 5 1	3 1 2	+3 +4 -1
eeiu NRG	0.98 1.17 0.75	186 234 129	14 10 4	/ 13 7 6 /	5 2 3	+1 +3 -2	82% 83% 80%	126 164 81	21% 38% 0%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
Ethan NRG	0.95 0.79 1.15	201 201 202	15 9 6	/ 15 9 6 /	5 3 2	0 0 0	73% 75% 70%	123 123 123	23% 62% 6%	1 0 1	4 2 2	-3 -2 -1
s0m NRG	0.86 0.84 0.89	191 206 175	15 9 6	/ 20 12 8 /	5 2 3	-5 -3 -2	59% 58% 60%	115 129 99	28% 26% 29%	1 1 0	4 1 3	-3 0 -3
hazed NRG	0.64 0.76 0.50	96 103 89	6 4 2	/ 15 8 7 /	6 3 3	-9 -4 -5	73% 67% 80%	87 102 69	27% 32% 18%	1 1 0	2 1 1	-1 0 -1

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

tex

NRG

1.40 1.53 1.25

294 329 254

23 14 9

/ 14 7 7 /

2 0 2

+9 +7 +2

73% 75% 70%

185 213 150

46% 48% 42%

6 5 1

3 1 2

+3 +4 -1

eeiu

NRG

0.98 1.17 0.75

186 234 129

14 10 4

/ 13 7 6 /

5 2 3

+1 +3 -2

82% 83% 80%

126 164 81

21% 38% 0%

0 0 0

Ethan

NRG

0.95 0.79 1.15

201 201 202

15 9 6

/ 15 9 6 /

5 3 2

0 0 0

73% 75% 70%

123 123 123

23% 62% 6%

1 0 1

4 2 2

-3 -2 -1

s0m

NRG

0.86 0.84 0.89

191 206 175

15 9 6

/ 20 12 8 /

5 2 3

-5 -3 -2

59% 58% 60%

115 129 99

28% 26% 29%

1 1 0

4 1 3

-3 0 -3

hazed

NRG

0.64 0.76 0.50

96 103 89

6 4 2

/ 15 8 7 /

6 3 3

-9 -4 -5

73% 67% 80%

87 102 69

27% 32% 18%

1 1 0

2 1 1

-1 0 -1

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
bang 100T	1.27 1.11 1.40	283 246 314	21 8 13	/ 15 6 9 /	5 2 3	+6 +2 +4	86% 90% 83%	157 129 180	30% 31% 29%	4 4 0	0 0 0	+4 +4 0
Asuna 100T	0.96 0.80 1.10	187 125 240	13 4 9	/ 15 6 9 /	9 5 4	-2 -2 0	59% 60% 58%	112 75 143	16% 24% 13%	4 1 3	4 1 3	0 0 0
Derrek 100T	0.94 1.52 0.46	163 221 115	14 10 4	/ 14 4 10 /	5 2 3	0 +6 -6	73% 90% 58%	101 134 74	19% 24% 16%	2 2 0	1 0 1	+1 +2 -1
Will 100T	0.93 1.05 0.83	228 255 206	17 8 9	/ 17 7 10 /	6 4 2	0 +1 -1	82% 90% 75%	144 166 125	9% 7% 11%	2 1 1	2 0 2	0 +1 -1
stellar 100T	0.91 0.90 0.91	153 162 146	12 6 6	/ 12 4 8 /	1 0 1	0 +2 -2	73% 70% 75%	109 103 115	16% 15% 18%	1 0 1	2 1 1	-1 -1 0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

bang

100T

1.27 1.11 1.40

283 246 314

21 8 13

/ 15 6 9 /

5 2 3

+6 +2 +4

86% 90% 83%

157 129 180

30% 31% 29%

4 4 0

0 0 0

+4 +4 0

Asuna

100T

0.96 0.80 1.10

187 125 240

13 4 9

/ 15 6 9 /

9 5 4

-2 -2 0

59% 60% 58%

112 75 143

16% 24% 13%

4 1 3

0 0 0

Derrek

100T

0.94 1.52 0.46

163 221 115

14 10 4

/ 14 4 10 /

5 2 3

0 +6 -6

73% 90% 58%

101 134 74

19% 24% 16%

2 2 0

1 0 1

+1 +2 -1

Will

100T

0.93 1.05 0.83

228 255 206

17 8 9

/ 17 7 10 /

6 4 2

0 +1 -1

82% 90% 75%

144 166 125

9% 7% 11%

2 1 1

2 0 2

0 +1 -1

stellar

100T

0.91 0.90 0.91

153 162 146

12 6 6

/ 12 4 8 /

1 0 1

0 +2 -2

73% 70% 75%

109 103 115

16% 15% 18%

1 0 1

2 1 1

-1 -1 0

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
tex NRG	1.16 1.28 1.05	238 307 198	33 18 15	/ 27 11 16 /	6 2 4	+6 +7 -1	72% 71% 73%	156 203 120	40% 46% 32%	7 5 2	6 2 4	+1 +3 -2
eeiu NRG	0.92 0.71 0.94	199 186 207	27 11 16	/ 28 12 16 /	12 4 8	-1 -1 0	77% 71% 82%	130 130 129	23% 36% 16%	1 0 1	2 1 1	-1 -1 0
s0m NRG	0.89 0.64 1.00	202 175 221	26 10 16	/ 33 16 17 /	10 3 7	-7 -6 -1	62% 47% 73%	130 113 144	28% 21% 33%	4 2 2	6 3 3	-2 -1 -1
Ethan NRG	0.85 0.55 1.04	171 158 188	24 9 15	/ 30 13 17 /	8 4 4	-6 -4 -2	64% 65% 64%	114 103 122	28% 53% 20%	2 0 2	5 2 3	-3 -2 -1
hazed NRG	0.64 0.78 0.54	123 135 107	14 8 6	/ 29 12 17 /	10 3 7	-15 -4 -11	72% 71% 73%	96 108 86	41% 41% 41%	2 1 1	4 1 3	-2 0 -2

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

tex

NRG

1.16 1.28 1.05

238 307 198

33 18 15

/ 27 11 16 /

6 2 4

+6 +7 -1

72% 71% 73%

156 203 120

40% 46% 32%

7 5 2

6 2 4

+1 +3 -2

eeiu

NRG

0.92 0.71 0.94

199 186 207

27 11 16

/ 28 12 16 /

12 4 8

-1 -1 0

77% 71% 82%

130 130 129

23% 36% 16%

1 0 1

2 1 1

-1 -1 0

s0m

NRG

0.89 0.64 1.00

202 175 221

26 10 16

/ 33 16 17 /

10 3 7

-7 -6 -1

62% 47% 73%

130 113 144

28% 21% 33%

4 2 2

6 3 3

-2 -1 -1

Ethan

NRG

0.85 0.55 1.04

171 158 188

24 9 15

/ 30 13 17 /

8 4 4

-6 -4 -2

64% 65% 64%

114 103 122

28% 53% 20%

2 0 2

5 2 3

-3 -2 -1

hazed

NRG

0.64 0.78 0.54

123 135 107

14 8 6

/ 29 12 17 /

10 3 7

-15 -4 -11

72% 71% 73%

96 108 86

41% 41% 41%

2 1 1

4 1 3

-2 0 -2

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
bang 100T	1.24 1.13 1.36	255 243 280	36 19 17	/ 26 15 11 /	11 7 4	+10 +4 +6	90% 91% 88%	154 150 159	36% 40% 33%	8 7 1	2 2 0	+6 +5 +1
Will 100T	1.20 1.17 1.37	274 300 229	36 23 13	/ 28 15 13 /	14 9 5	+8 +8 0	79% 82% 76%	163 184 137	10% 10% 11%	3 2 1	4 2 2	-1 0 -1
stellar 100T	1.09 0.97 1.39	185 171 194	26 14 12	/ 21 11 10 /	10 6 4	+5 +3 +2	79% 82% 76%	122 115 130	15% 14% 17%	3 0 3	2 1 1	+1 -1 +2
Asuna 100T	1.01 0.85 1.26	203 170 241	26 12 14	/ 27 16 11 /	16 10 6	-1 -4 +3	64% 68% 59%	127 117 140	18% 22% 14%	5 1 4	6 3 3	-1 -2 +1
Derrek 100T	0.97 1.31 0.61	146 184 101	23 18 5	/ 23 11 12 /	9 5 4	0 +7 -7	72% 82% 59%	94 115 66	25% 32% 15%	4 4 0	2 0 2	+2 +4 -2

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

bang

100T

1.24 1.13 1.36

255 243 280

36 19 17

/ 26 15 11 /

11 7 4

+10 +4 +6

90% 91% 88%

154 150 159

36% 40% 33%

8 7 1

2 2 0

+6 +5 +1

Will

100T

1.20 1.17 1.37

274 300 229

36 23 13

/ 28 15 13 /

14 9 5

+8 +8 0

79% 82% 76%

163 184 137

10% 10% 11%

3 2 1

4 2 2

-1 0 -1

stellar

100T

1.09 0.97 1.39

185 171 194

26 14 12

/ 21 11 10 /

10 6 4

+5 +3 +2

79% 82% 76%

122 115 130

15% 14% 17%

3 0 3

2 1 1

+1 -1 +2

Asuna

100T

1.01 0.85 1.26

203 170 241

26 12 14

/ 27 16 11 /

16 10 6

-1 -4 +3

64% 68% 59%

127 117 140

18% 22% 14%

5 1 4

6 3 3

-1 -2 +1

Derrek

100T

0.97 1.31 0.61

146 184 101

23 18 5

/ 23 11 12 /

9 5 4

0 +7 -7

72% 82% 59%

94 115 66

25% 32% 15%

4 4 0

2 0 2

+2 +4 -2

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
tex NRG	0.91 1.04 0.85	181 255 150	10 4 6	/ 13 4 9 /	4 2 2	-3 0 -3	71% 60% 75%	120 180 95	30% 40% 23%	1 0 1	3 1 2	-2 -1 -1
s0m NRG	0.91 0.44 1.10	212 102 259	11 1 10	/ 13 4 9 /	5 1 4	-2 -3 +1	65% 20% 83%	149 73 181	29% 10% 34%	3 1 2	2 2 0	+1 -1 +2
eeiu NRG	0.87 0.26 1.13	212 72 271	13 1 12	/ 15 5 10 /	7 2 5	-2 -4 +2	71% 40% 83%	134 49 169	26% 29% 25%	1 0 1	2 1 1	-1 -1 0
Ethan NRG	0.74 0.30 0.93	141 55 177	9 0 9	/ 15 4 11 /	3 1 2	-6 -4 -2	53% 40% 58%	101 55 120	37% 33% 38%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0
hazed NRG	0.65 0.80 0.58	149 214 123	8 4 4	/ 14 4 10 /	4 0 4	-6 0 -6	71% 80% 67%	108 124 101	58% 63% 56%	1 0 1	2 0 2	-1 0 -1

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

tex

NRG

0.91 1.04 0.85

181 255 150

10 4 6

/ 13 4 9 /

4 2 2

-3 0 -3

71% 60% 75%

120 180 95

30% 40% 23%

1 0 1

3 1 2

-2 -1 -1

s0m

NRG

0.91 0.44 1.10

212 102 259

11 1 10

/ 13 4 9 /

5 1 4

-2 -3 +1

65% 20% 83%

149 73 181

29% 10% 34%

3 1 2

2 2 0

+1 -1 +2

eeiu

NRG

0.87 0.26 1.13

212 72 271

13 1 12

/ 15 5 10 /

7 2 5

-2 -4 +2

71% 40% 83%

134 49 169

26% 29% 25%

1 0 1

2 1 1

-1 -1 0

Ethan

NRG

0.74 0.30 0.93

141 55 177

9 0 9

/ 15 4 11 /

3 1 2

-6 -4 -2

53% 40% 58%

101 55 120

37% 33% 38%

1 0 1

0 0 0

hazed

NRG

0.65 0.80 0.58

149 214 123

8 4 4

/ 14 4 10 /

4 0 4

-6 0 -6

71% 80% 67%

108 124 101

58% 63% 56%

1 0 1

2 0 2

-1 0 -1

	R	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Will 100T	1.47 1.28 1.92	320 336 284	19 15 4	/ 11 8 3 /	8 5 3	+8 +7 +1	76% 75% 80%	189 198 166	12% 13% 10%	1 1 0	2 2 0	-1 -1 0
stellar 100T	1.28 1.03 1.87	216 178 310	14 8 6	/ 9 7 2 /	9 6 3	+5 +1 +4	88% 92% 80%	138 126 168	14% 13% 16%	2 0 2	0 0 0	+2 0 +2
bang 100T	1.20 1.16 1.31	227 240 199	15 11 4	/ 11 9 2 /	6 5 1	+4 +2 +2	94% 92% 100%	150 167 110	50% 53% 45%	4 3 1	2 2 0	+2 +1 +1
Asuna 100T	1.06 0.91 1.41	218 208 243	13 8 5	/ 12 10 2 /	7 5 2	+1 -2 +3	71% 75% 60%	147 153 134	20% 21% 17%	1 0 1	2 2 0	-1 -2 +1
Derrek 100T	1.00 1.10 0.76	128 154 65	9 8 1	/ 9 7 2 /	4 3 1	0 +1 -1	71% 75% 60%	84 99 48	32% 40% 13%	2 2 0	1 0 1	+1 +2 -1

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Will

100T

1.47 1.28 1.92

320 336 284

19 15 4

/ 11 8 3 /

8 5 3

+8 +7 +1

76% 75% 80%

189 198 166

12% 13% 10%

1 1 0

2 2 0

-1 -1 0

stellar

100T

1.28 1.03 1.87

216 178 310

14 8 6

/ 9 7 2 /

9 6 3

+5 +1 +4

88% 92% 80%

138 126 168

14% 13% 16%

2 0 2

0 0 0

+2 0 +2

bang

100T

1.20 1.16 1.31

227 240 199

15 11 4

/ 11 9 2 /

6 5 1

+4 +2 +2

94% 92% 100%

150 167 110

50% 53% 45%

4 3 1

2 2 0

+2 +1 +1

Asuna

100T

1.06 0.91 1.41

218 208 243

13 8 5

/ 12 10 2 /

7 5 2

+1 -2 +3

71% 75% 60%

147 153 134

20% 21% 17%

1 0 1

2 2 0

-1 -2 +1

Derrek

100T

1.00 1.10 0.76

128 154 65

9 8 1

/ 9 7 2 /

4 3 1

0 +1 -1

71% 75% 60%

84 99 48

32% 40% 13%

2 2 0

1 0 1

+1 +2 -1

#66

flowerpollendck

Frags

–

they're both such close teams. I want to say NRG wins against 100T, but with how 100T's been looking lately (especially against XSET) with the added challenge of Ethan on the other side, it's looking like 100T wins this 2-1 against NRG. Maybe even 2-0 if they're feeling it? 100t are 5-1 on bind and 8-2 on split so it's gonna be interesting. will also be super depressing if NRG doesnt make it out of playoffs yet again

#67

BOSSCK

-3

Frags

–

NRG 2-0 100T
w streamer drops 30

#79

BOSSCK

Frags

–

unfortunate

#68

laefty

Frags

–

pretty sure hazed just saved a classic on round 8

#69

n1kkobami

-3

Frags

–

Nice defending side NRG... Clowns.

#70

JinniJ0310

Frags

–

I think in my opinion, 100T is the best util team in NA. They get kills with it easily

#71

ShxdowZ

Frags

–

looks like the half-shields eco meta aint working for NRG

#72

empty117

Frags

–

100t pog team work and bang is just best man

#73

ShxdowZ

Frags

–

based of how 100T won NRG's map pick its looking good for 100T but who knows what NRG's got for bind well have to see #100TWIN

#74

pewpew

-4

Frags

–

hazed so goddamn lost.

#75

pewpew

-4

Frags

–

NRG is like an OpTic copycat but not so good lol

#76

cribbitercrab

Frags

–

Score is reversed lol

Edit:
Thanks for fast fix

#77

bonkashi

Frags

–

why the live update score the wrong way around

#78

Achu

-7

Frags

–

Wish we could see Sentinels w/ Rawkus vs this NRG. genuinely convinced Sen would 2-0 them, havent seen a worse NA team in quite a while

#80

MerkFreeks

Frags

–

NRG would beat them. Its not NRG being bad moreso 100T being on another level rn. NRG are still better than TSM and SEN (and V1/PKS since they beat both them to qualify)

#83

Achu

-7

Frags

–

you're biased so ill ignore you with all due respect

#88

ItsMeDio

Frags

–

But he's true

#89

Achu

-1

Frags

–

no it isnt? the very first pistol of the game they got 1v5 ninja defused, and then ecoed a few rounds after. 2nd map they win pistol and lose to another eco lmao theyre hopeless. 100t are good but NRG made them look like Optic

#90

61Hiko

Frags

–

ur the type of guy, that says gg ff no next, after losing pistol in ranked. Get outta here.

#92

Sagar

Frags

–

Achu brother think about it when it's just you having polarized opinions so must be something you are observing wrong

#91

Ullyr

Frags

–

NRG aren't bad lol same with xset. 100T just on another level now as a valorant team they're potential is being unlock. In one year nearly every tier 1 team will be expected to play on the level as 100T , and the top teams would be even better.

#82

sweatybums

Frags

–

where the copium at now lmao

#84

Hisssoka

Frags

–

bruh what was that, gg 100t absolutely killed us

#85

Sharkwi

Frags

–

LETS GO!!!!

#86

KyLZi

Frags

–

Bind was Brutal.

#87

vnvodich

Frags

–

No Complexity compound buff this time but great to see 100T getting back in form again

#100

Kai__

Frags

–

sheeesh...i feel sad for nrg tho :(

#101

Sharkwi

Frags

–

Ethan left 100T for this? JK love the guy GG's NRG.