Map vetoes | VLR.gg

#1

ForumPeasant

If I’m correct LOUD gets 2 bans and Optic gets none correct? That would be pretty embarrassing for LOUD if they lose this series considering they get to play breeze as well.

#2

NG1nS

0

Frags

+

–

sure buddy

#3

kyo12

1

Frags

+

–

1

#4

Sikko

1

Frags

+

–

Veto isn't looking good for optic, isn't it a bit unfair to get two bans and a pick on top of that?

#6

NG1nS

1

Frags

+

–

no it's deserved

#7

Sikko

0

Frags

+

–

2 bans seem a bit much

#8

Marty

1

Frags

+

–

Isn't it a bit unfair that your opponent gets 2 tries to make it to the grand final but you only get one?

#9

kyo12

0

Frags

+

–

isnt it unfair for the other team to ban your best map and their worst map, and have no bans so that you have to play your worst map? lol

#13

Marty

0

Frags

+

–

No

#14

kyo12

0

Frags

+

–

could u explain why it isnt?

#19

blueberry

0

Frags

+

–

Teams deserve an advantage when they don’t lose a single matchup on their way to grand finals. Other esports give the upper bracket winner a 1 map advantage before the games even start. Be happy it’s something like vetoes.

#10

Ancient1

0

Frags

+

–

What r u talking about? no one was given extra chance, if loud had lost upper final they would be given chance to.

#12

Marty

0

Frags

+

–

But they didn't. Therefore they only had one chance. If optic won they would've only had one chance and this map advantage would still be fair. You guys are complaining for nothing. If a team wants an advantage then they fight for it. Which optic did but they lost. Not that hard to grasp.

#15

Sikko

0

Frags

+

–

no one is saying they shouldn't get an advantage they obviously deserve it, it just looks like Loud is given more advantage than necessary. (also that logic about another chance is still weird)

#16

Marty

0

Frags

+

–

Based on what? If this was any other tac fps optic would already be a whole map down.

#17

Sikko

0

Frags

+

–

welp it's an opinion

#21

NG1nS

0

Frags

+

–

yes but they didn't, you get or nah?

#11

Sikko

0

Frags

+

–

if loud would have lost they would also have gotten the same chance to make it to the grand final, so weird logical ig?

#18

zyzyck

0

Frags

+

–

I mean its to reward a team for qualifying for GF through upper finals, makes perfect sense imo.

#5

kyo12

0

Frags

+

–

yes, very

#20

wohe

0

Frags

+

–

what are you guys talking about imo it's the only thing that made double elimination good this event the team that went with 0 losses should get such advantage and it's very fair