0

SEN haters lmao

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
valulrantefanboy

They won't lost today sorry haters

#2
peppreish
-6
Frags
+

doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo

#3
kristof
8
Frags
+

they will lose in playoffs

#4
coguyy
0
Frags
+

i mean people hate sen but they are not washed enough to lose in group stage, we are waiting for playoffs

#5
Hasbulla
0
Frags
+

They won't lost today sorry haters

#6
chauste
3
Frags
+

⣞⢽⢪⢣⢣⢣⢫⡺⡵⣝⡮⣗⢷⢽⢽⢽⣮⡷⡽⣜⣜⢮⢺⣜⢷⢽⢝⡽⣝
⠸⡸⠜⠕⠕⠁⢁⢇⢏⢽⢺⣪⡳⡝⣎⣏⢯⢞⡿⣟⣷⣳⢯⡷⣽⢽⢯⣳⣫⠇
⠀⠀⢀⢀⢄⢬⢪⡪⡎⣆⡈⠚⠜⠕⠇⠗⠝⢕⢯⢫⣞⣯⣿⣻⡽⣏⢗⣗⠏⠀
⠀⠪⡪⡪⣪⢪⢺⢸⢢⢓⢆⢤⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢊⢞⡾⣿⡯⣏⢮⠷⠁⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠈⠊⠆⡃⠕⢕⢇⢇⢇⢇⢇⢏⢎⢎⢆⢄⠀⢑⣽⣿⢝⠲⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡿⠂⠠⠀⡇⢇⠕⢈⣀⠀⠁⠡⠣⡣⡫⣂⣿⠯⢪⠰⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⡦⡙⡂⢀⢤⢣⠣⡈⣾⡃⠠⠄⠀⡄⢱⣌⣶⢏⢊⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢝⡲⣜⡮⡏⢎⢌⢂⠙⠢⠐⢀⢘⢵⣽⣿⡿⠁⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠨⣺⡺⡕⡕⡱⡑⡆⡕⡅⡕⡜⡼⢽⡻⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣳⣫⣾⣵⣗⡵⡱⡡⢣⢑⢕⢜⢕⡝⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⡿⡽⡑⢌⠪⡢⡣⣣⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⡟⡾⣿⢿⢿⢵⣽⣾⣼⣘⢸⢸⣞⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠇⠡⠩⡫⢿⣝⡻⡮⣒⢽⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

#7
xDillan
6
Frags
+

Sen are the tier 1.5 gatekeepers. still not in NA top 5

#8
h9zard
14
Frags
+
peppreish [#2]

doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo

opTic lost 2 maps to them lmao

#9
jblancard
-3
Frags
+

They won't lost today sorry haters

#10
jawn
4
Frags
+
peppreish [#2]

doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo

if the Rise from the OpTic game showed up they had a legit chance of even sweeping them

#11
peppreish
-6
Frags
+
h9zard [#8]

opTic lost 2 maps to them lmao

yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks

#12
na1ler
0
Frags
+

sick > shaz > dapr > tenz >>>>> zombs.

#13
delfi
1
Frags
+
peppreish [#2]

doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo

well they did beat optic in a match.

#14
andreziN
0
Frags
+

VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE

#15
h9zard
-4
Frags
+
xDillan [#7]

Sen are the tier 1.5 gatekeepers. still not in NA top 5

literally group stage.

#16
peppreish
-1
Frags
+
delfi [#13]

well they did beat optic in a match.

#12

#17
wewZ
5
Frags
+
peppreish [#11]

yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks

lmao still lost

#18
valulrantefanboy
0
Frags
+
andreziN [#14]

VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE

who ??? Glitched cam abusers ?? (cheaters more likely)

#19
StrongGhostMayor
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#2]

doesn't matter, rise are genuinely not that good SEN shouldn't have lost map 1 to them imo

"rise are genuinely not that good"
Won vs. Optic who are top 3 NA but that doesnt matter right?

#20
h9zard
1
Frags
+
peppreish [#11]

yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks

its still group stage bruh they qualified.

#21
capemari
1
Frags
+
xDillan [#7]

Sen are the tier 1.5 gatekeepers. still not in NA top 5

Hard to disagree.

#22
peppreish
-1
Frags
+
StrongGhostMayor [#19]

"rise are genuinely not that good"
Won vs. Optic who are top 3 NA but that doesnt matter right?

#12 genius

#23
peppreish
-5
Frags
+
wewZ [#17]

lmao still lost

no way u think today's win was something to be proud of for SEN lmao

#24
wewZ
-1
Frags
+
peppreish [#22]

#12 genius

lmao a loss is a loss

#25
Rabbiit
0
Frags
+
andreziN [#14]

VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE

Andrezin You remind me of trembolona commenting, who really are you 🐢

#26
peppreish
-2
Frags
+
wewZ [#24]

lmao a loss is a loss

where did i say it wasn't lmao, can u read

#27
Rabbiit
0
Frags
+
valulrantefanboy [#18]

who ??? Glitched cam abusers ?? (cheaters more likely)

Guild fan 💀

#28
Blazieboy
3
Frags
+
peppreish [#11]

yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks

A win is a win 4 weeks later or not does not matter.

#29
wewZ
5
Frags
+
peppreish [#23]

no way u think today's win was something to be proud of for SEN lmao

never said they should be proud, just saying that optic lost to rise

#30
kristof
0
Frags
+
andreziN [#14]

VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE

vk would win even without cam

#31
jawn
1
Frags
+
peppreish [#23]

no way u think today's win was something to be proud of for SEN lmao

doesn't take away from anything, a win is a win no matter how sloppy it was

#32
peppreish
-1
Frags
+
Blazieboy [#28]

A win is a win 4 weeks later or not does not matter.

it really does, you must be delusional to think it doesn't. optic didn't enter a single competition since champions, it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches

#33
Xerol
-2
Frags
+
xDillan [#7]

Sen are the tier 1.5 gatekeepers. still not in NA top 5

Sen just gets slow starts on maps and trips up at times, super easy to critique in hindsight. They're a good tier 1 team, y'all just like to be edgy and hate lol

#34
hiyo
0
Frags
+
andreziN [#14]

VIVO KEYD WILL NOT DESTROY SENTINELS
BECAUSE SENTINELS WILL NEVER GO TO MASTERS/CHAMPS ANYMORE

Ok? VK won’t make masters either lmao

#35
peppreish
1
Frags
+
wewZ [#29]

never said they should be proud, just saying that optic lost to rise

irrelevant then lmao, SEN aren't top3 in their region

#36
peppreish
-1
Frags
+

oh boy these sen fans

#37
wewZ
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#32]

it really does, you must be delusional to think it doesn't. optic didn't enter a single competition since champions, it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches

yes 1st week results matter less in group stage where it is a round robin

uhuh

#38
blueberry
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#32]

it really does, you must be delusional to think it doesn't. optic didn't enter a single competition since champions, it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches

rise didnt play since lcq LMFAO you really thought you had a point

#39
peppreish
-2
Frags
+
wewZ [#37]

yes 1st week results matter less in group stage where it is a round robin

uhuh

you really just don't have reading comprehension huh. a week one result is less indicative of a team's level compared to their form in the latest week. should be obvious

#40
andrewdamf
0
Frags
+
Rabbiit [#27]

Guild fan 💀

?

#41
wewZ
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#39]

you really just don't have reading comprehension huh. a week one result is less indicative of a team's level compared to their form in the latest week. should be obvious

the results do matter tho. The first week is as important as the last if you want to qualify

#42
wewZ
0
Frags
+
blueberry [#38]

rise didnt play since lcq LMFAO you really thought you had a point

LMAO THAT'S GOOD

#43
ffffffff
-2
Frags
+
peppreish [#35]

irrelevant then lmao, SEN aren't top3 in their region

Optic lost a map vs Sen LUL

#44
peppreish
0
Frags
+
blueberry [#38]

rise didnt play since lcq LMFAO you really thought you had a point

theres no way u have above 100 iq, it doesn't matter if they didn't play since lcq since they literally went 1-6 on maps after 1st week, and optic went 4-1 on maps

#45
peppreish
0
Frags
+
ffffffff [#43]

Optic lost a map vs Sen LUL

doesn't have anything to do with what i said, c9, optic, and guard are better than SEN atm lol

#46
peppreish
0
Frags
+
wewZ [#41]

the results do matter tho. The first week is as important as the last if you want to qualify

nobody said the results don't matter? you're just making strawman points lol

#47
Rabbiit
0
Frags
+
andrewdamf [#40]

?

?

#48
wewZ
1
Frags
+
peppreish [#44]

theres no way u have above 100 iq, it doesn't matter if they didn't play since lcq since they literally went 1-6 on maps after 1st week, and optic went 4-1 on maps

lmao malding, rise had way more time not playing in tourney but still beat optic

50iq moment

#49
blueberry
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#44]

theres no way u have above 100 iq, it doesn't matter if they didn't play since lcq since they literally went 1-6 on maps after 1st week, and optic went 4-1 on maps

ok? completely ignoring the fact that I shattered your initial argument then changed your point, the first week is as important as the last. teams might not be at their best potential, that doesn't mean every game is a throwaway just because they havent played in a bit.

#50
wewZ
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#46]

nobody said the results don't matter? you're just making strawman points lol

"a week one result is less indicative of a team's level compared to their form in the latest week"

#51
peppreish
0
Frags
+
blueberry [#49]

ok? completely ignoring the fact that I shattered your initial argument then changed your point, the first week is as important as the last. teams might not be at their best potential, that doesn't mean every game is a throwaway just because they havent played in a bit.

"shattered your initial point", bro what? you just didn't understand my point. i clearly said 1st week results are not as indicative of form as the later weeks, because teams need to get back into the groove of competitive valorant. you then made irrelevant points and thought you did something LMAO. nobody called 1st week a throwaway, it's just irrelevant to point out to my initial statement

#52
feelsbadboaster
1
Frags
+
peppreish [#45]

doesn't have anything to do with what i said, c9, optic, and guard are better than SEN atm lol

do you type a single sentence without lol or lmao

#53
peppreish
0
Frags
+
wewZ [#48]

lmao malding, rise had way more time not playing in tourney but still beat optic

50iq moment

dude thinks i'm mad over a vlr thread lmao. you're just repeating the same point he made that i refuted. please learn to read i beg

#54
peppreish
0
Frags
+
feelsbadboaster [#52]

do you type a single sentence without lol or lmao

can u not read 2 lines above what u replied to

#55
blueberry
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#51]

"shattered your initial point", bro what? you just didn't understand my point. i clearly said 1st week results are not as indicative of form as the later weeks, because teams need to get back into the groove of competitive valorant. you then made irrelevant points and thought you did something LMAO. nobody called 1st week a throwaway, it's just irrelevant to point out to my initial statement

optic didn't enter a single competition since champions

broke that point EASILY.

also you said;

it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches

its pretty clear you thought week one wasnt important now your backtracking cuz u got called out

#56
peppreish
0
Frags
+
blueberry [#55]

optic didn't enter a single competition since champions

broke that point EASILY.

also you said;

it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches

its pretty clear you thought week one wasnt important now your backtracking cuz u got called out

  1. you legit can't read lol. i said that optic's loss to rise was after a break of not playing, and that their later play showed their true form. rise's later play showed their true form as well. what can you not understand from that?

  2. there's no backtracking, you just don't understand context or words in general. a first week results holds less value in terms of current form compared to a 4th week result. don't know how else you could interpret that

#57
wewZ
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#45]

doesn't have anything to do with what i said, c9, optic, and guard are better than SEN atm lol

that wasnt your initial point

#58
peppreish
0
Frags
+
wewZ [#57]

that wasnt your initial point

yeah my initial point was that SEN shouldn't have lost map 1. i never backed down from that genius

#59
wewZ
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#53]

dude thinks i'm mad over a vlr thread lmao. you're just repeating the same point he made that i refuted. please learn to read i beg

uhuh refuted yes

#60
wewZ
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#58]

yeah my initial point was that SEN shouldn't have lost map 1. i never backed down from that genius

"yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks"
-referring to optic losing

+1st week or 4th week, it is still part of the same group stage. So both are as relevant. If you go to like last year's champions, the results of that isn't as relevant rn because it isn't part of this group stage. But the first week all the way to the last week is part of the same group stage which means all results are equally as valid

#61
peppreish
0
Frags
+
wewZ [#60]

"yeah in their vct opener lmao, not after like 4 weeks"
-referring to optic losing

+1st week or 4th week, it is still part of the same group stage. So both are as relevant. If you go to like last year's champions, the results of that isn't as relevant rn because it isn't part of this group stage. But the first week all the way to the last week is part of the same group stage which means all results are equally as valid

i swear you haven't been reading a single one of my replies, you've said the same thing over and over. i've clarified your misunderstanding many times; the 1st week match is not nearly as relevant to current form as the 4th week is, and optic went 4-1 in maps after that, while rise went 1-6, obviously proving how the first week was a fluke. you're just stating the same moot point that "all games are equal in the tournament", while i have clarified the true meaning of what i said many many times

#62
wewZ
0
Frags
+
peppreish [#61]

i swear you haven't been reading a single one of my replies, you've said the same thing over and over. i've clarified your misunderstanding many times; the 1st week match is not nearly as relevant to current form as the 4th week is, and optic went 4-1 in maps after that, while rise went 1-6, obviously proving how the first week was a fluke. you're just stating the same moot point that "all games are equal in the tournament", while i have clarified the true meaning of what i said many many times

consistency is part of being a good team. If a team get's "fluked" on, then they aren't consistent. Just cause they had a break doesn't mean it excuses their loss

#63
xDillan
0
Frags
+
Xerol [#33]

Sen just gets slow starts on maps and trips up at times, super easy to critique in hindsight. They're a good tier 1 team, y'all just like to be edgy and hate lol

Sen strats works against tier 1.5 teams and every game they have is close. They got exposed hard by Optic. i dont see them making it top 4 at play off brackets

#64
peppreish
0
Frags
+
wewZ [#62]

consistency is part of being a good team. If a team get's "fluked" on, then they aren't consistent. Just cause they had a break doesn't mean it excuses their loss

it really does excuse their loss. they've been consistent after that first week. you can't expect a team to be consistent when their matches haven't been played consistently

#65
andreziN
0
Frags
+
Rabbiit [#25]

Andrezin You remind me of trembolona commenting, who really are you 🐢

im imitating him

#66
peppreish
0
Frags
+
blueberry [#55]

optic didn't enter a single competition since champions

broke that point EASILY.

also you said;

it's pretty obvious that a first week result holds much less value than one in the 4th week of matches

its pretty clear you thought week one wasnt important now your backtracking cuz u got called out

yo, optic won and sen didn't make it to LAN (i think i was right :D)

#67
peppreish
0
Frags
+
wewZ [#62]

consistency is part of being a good team. If a team get's "fluked" on, then they aren't consistent. Just cause they had a break doesn't mean it excuses their loss

yo, optic won and sen didn't make it to LAN (i think i was right :D)

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment