Group alpha omega have different number of games ?

And they have same 2 minimum win . How's that fair

yea that's why its a shitty format

they should've just made every team play each other and top 4 qualifies , like ucl qualification type shit

on the second split the group with 5 games now will have 5 games again, while the group that had 6 games will have 4. It evens it out eventually and it was the best format I could think of if they wanted to split the matches between 2 streches

Hashib [#3]

they should've just made every team play each other and top 4 qualifies , like ucl qualification type shit

no time for a full season before masters ( in this fucked up calendar that ends in september-october)

Liwus [#4]

on the second split the group with 5 games now will have 5 games again, while the group that had 6 games will have 4. It evens it out eventually and it was the best format I could think of if they wanted to split the matches between 2 streches

But still it's unfair. Second split conditions can be totally different from this one.

you can also say its not fair if they get a 1 win minimum. its just 1 less match than group Alpha, so everybody would be guaranteed to go to playoffs. The problem is that almost all good teams are in Alpha with execptions like Loud (even though they didnt win a map. they were thought to be good before now).

if you switched C9 and Mibr then it would have been better imo. or Furia aswell since they also suck.

Existential_crisis [#6]

But still it's unfair. Second split conditions can be totally different from this one.

it is, but I cant think of a fair format if they cant have everyone playing all other teams, and I personally would rather have this than all teams playing each other on bo1s

VCT is fucked.