14

TOP 10+2 TEAMS IN VAL HISTORY

Comments:
Threaded Linear
← View full thread
#48
PINTO0
0
Frags
+

top 8*
and only played Champs because they win Masters and had a easy group (no Bren, F4Q, G2(0-13 vs Gambit))
and even they were 2nd in the group

#50
jawn
0
Frags
+

cool, i'm not saying they shouldn't be last, just saying your criteria are wack as fuck

#52
PINTO0
0
Frags
+

my criteria is FPX made a lower bracket run, SEN only won the easiest tournament
PRX even get in 2 finals(lose 1 of them against FPX)
maybe SEN>DRX cause DRX 0 finals. i think the only thing make them better is the 100 matches in a row
still FPX 5/8 majors, Sen 3/8 majors, DRX 7/8 majors, PRX 6/8 majors, but Sen 1 major, FPX 1 major, PRX 0 majors, DRX 0 majors

#55
jawn
0
Frags
+

you're absolutely fucking drunk if you think SEN>DRX, FPX got 1 trophy and one top 4, DRX got 2 top 4s while beating them and 3 top 6s, PRX got 2 top2s and 2 top 4s, they have been better for longer therefore they are historically better

#56
PINTO0
0
Frags
+

tell me, who's bigger in History
A. Madrid or M. City
and then A. Madrid or Celtic

#57
jawn
0
Frags
+

are you trying to compare the absolute behemoth of a trophy room madrid have to FPX's 1 trophy? be fr

#58
PINTO0
0
Frags
+

and wtf is Atletico Madrid not Real Madrid
just say who's bigger
Atletico Madrid, Manchester City or Celtic
in order

#59
jawn
0
Frags
+

madrid > celtic > city

#60
PINTO0
0
Frags
+

Madrid>CELTIC????? WTF
now i see why you say the other things
Celtic and M. City both won a Triplet
A. Madrid never won a Champions

#61
jawn
0
Frags
+

was talking about real but yeah if it's atletico: celtic > madrid >= city

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment