0

Players who dont match their ego

Comments:
Threaded Linear
← View full thread
#48
KyLZi
2
Frags
+

champs had a very similar outcome as Reykjavik 22 and the EMEA teams were full strength so...

#49
dapada
0
Frags
+

again, bro skipped copenhagen completely💀

#50
KyLZi
0
Frags
+

okay, what do you want me to say about copenhagen?

#54
KyLZi
0
Frags
+

okay... I was able to explain why I brought up champs why are you bringing up this match? what does it have to do with what we are talking about?

#56
dapada
0
Frags
+

what does it have to do with what we are talking about?

are you serious right now?
obviously because FPX couldn't attend Reykjavik I thought we were past this already..

and also look at this timeline:
Reykjavik (2022-04-10) -> Copenhagen (2022-07-10) -> Champions (2022-08-31)

Reykjavik to Copenhagen was 3 months away (as opposed to Champions which was 4-close-to-5 months away)
Comparing Reykjavik to Copenhagen is the only logical metric we can use, duh? Champions 2022 was legit, LOUD and OPTIC did great but Reykjavik was not. As simple as that.

EDIT:
If somehow PRX with something wins Champions 2023, then Fnatic Tokyo Run is also a fraudulent tournament. There I said it. I'm not biased.

#57
KyLZi
1
Frags
+

Holy fuck you act like an arrogant fool.

True, fpx was not at full strength at Reykjavik and I agree Copenhagen showed that fpx was a top team. But, champs showed even with the EMEA teams at full strength the tournament had almost the exact same outcome as Reykjavik disproving the assumption that had the EMEA teams been at full strength at Reykjavik the tourney would have been any different. It probably would have been but its not a set thing and is cope.

EMEA had 2 chances one with weak rosters and one with full-strength rosters. Both times ended very similarly.

#61
dapada
0
Frags
+

True, fpx was not at full strength at Reykjavik

Tf you mean fpx was not at full strenght at reykjavik? THEY LITERALLY DID NOT ATTEND THE EVENT

It probably would have been but its not a set thing and is cope.

Please read my post carefully lil bro before calling someone's an arrogant fool, eh fuck it, I'm just gonna write it down again

I said "Reykjavik was a fraudulent tournament because FPX couldn't attend the event and FNC had to play with 2 subs" <- It's LITERALLY a fact🤦🏻‍♂️

"It probably would have been but its not a set thing" is the reason why I called it fraudulent tournament (unlike Champions 2022 where all of the strongest team from every region were present)

#64
KyLZi
1
Frags
+

Firstly. No, I won't read your comments carefully as I need to filter the arrogance out which is tedious. State your points clearly and without being a dickhead or no one will take you seriously.

Secondly, let's go all the way back to the topic of the thread. How does any of this prove that according to you "every NA pros basically, all bark no bite.."? Which is what the conversation was about in the first place not how fraudulent Copenhagen was which is a fucking rabbit hole of nonsense.

#68
dapada
0
Frags
+

😂 Ah please why would you left the part where I said "The last time they won something, Riot had to nerf EMEA" but alr just for the sake of it, I'm just going to ignore it.

LOL you're the one that said "no its not (a fact)" in the first place, don't act like you're not the one who started this conversation about how fraudulent-or-not reykjavik is and not about their ego🤣

#58
Manaphy
0
Frags
+

It is possible teams could be in different forms at different times. Also, a 3-month difference is still long as shit.

#63
dapada
0
Frags
+

True
But that doesn't change the fact that EMEA were heavily nerfed🤷🏻‍♂️

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment