0

Masters 3 Slots??

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
ShiningTyGuy

Do you guys think Riot would actually adjust the regional slots for Masters 3? I think everyone's hoping for some sort of adjustment to allow for higher quality play but do you think Riot would actually pull the trigger. And just to clarify I'm all for regional representation for a game so new but would also like to see the actual best teams in the world compete in Berlin.

Should have clarified this originally but I meant the slots per region. I know there's sixteen teams. I'm talking about adjusting the slots per region based on Masters 2 showings to produce the highest quality global competition. Example taking a slot from Japan and giving it to CIS... just an example

#2
labc
0
Frags
+

yea its already been adjusted. you can check liquipedia for more info

#4
ShiningTyGuy
0
Frags
+

I'm seeing the same slots per region on liquipedia unless I'm missing something...what was changed?

#5
labc
0
Frags
+

Regional Distribution
16 Teams
North America: 3 slots
EMEA: 4 slots
Brazil: 2 slots
Korea: 2 slots
Japan: 2 slots
Southeast Asia: 2 slots
Latin America: 1 slot

#6
feaN
-3
Frags
+

brazil doesnt deserve 1 slot haha JAMPI POGG

#11
labc
1
Frags
+

they should have only 1. 2 is ridiculous

#20
ShiningTyGuy
0
Frags
+

2 slots would be ok if LATAM is merged with them

#7
GetsystheGr8
1
Frags
+

That's the same as before

#9
ShiningTyGuy
0
Frags
+

I edited my post should have been clearer in what I meant

#12
labc
0
Frags
+

oh. probably it will not be adjusted but it should be.

#3
DocCOms
0
Frags
+

https://www.vlr.gg/event/466/valorant-champions-tour-stage-3-masters-berlin
I dont know if you mean this but master 3 will have 16 teams and more slots per region.
Also Champions.

#8
ShiningTyGuy
0
Frags
+

just editied my post. I should have been clearer in what I meant

#10
bleghfarec
0
Frags
+

Unlikely. it's more about representation than "higher quality of play", which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Regions aren't "inherently bad" in their skill or the players they produce; I'm sure we'll see some upsets in Berlin from regions that didn't perform as well in Iceland.

#15
ShiningTyGuy
0
Frags
+

I somewhat agree...I think if that's their long-term approach it will hinder the esports success. Esports is suppose to be competitive. People expect to see the best in the world when watching a global tournament. I'm ok with fair regional representation throughout this year, to give every region a fair opportunity to display their talent, but think they should steer towards merit after that.

#13
Olofboost
0
Frags
+

I agree but CIS isn't getting a slot any time soon, as much as I want it to happen. Turkey will though, probably starting from next season.

#14
edelhose1337
0
Frags
+

6 Asia Slots and 4 Emea. Its just a joke.
Japan 2 slots, why?

#17
PoohShiesty
0
Frags
+

Because that's where the money is

#19
ShiningTyGuy
0
Frags
+

That does make sense and is obviously the only logical reason, which is understandable, Riot needs to make money. A balance just needs to be found on making money/regional representation/top global teams

#18
ShiningTyGuy
0
Frags
+

1000000% agree. Some of these challenger finals for stage 3 could be lans which would make it possible to merge some regions like japan and sea, and the best teams comes from there for 2 slots or something like that. Europe minus CIS/TR should get 3 slots, and thats my honest opinion

#16
Philosopher_Stone
0
Frags
+

My opinion: https://www.vlr.gg/post/71397/riot-lan-slot-fix

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment