Saturday, January 28th
11:00 AM EST
Patch 6.01
EGN ban Fracture; SAW ban Ascent; EGN ban Bind; SAW ban Breeze; EGN ban Haven; SAW ban Pearl; Icebox remains
Betting
$100 on SAW returned $100 at 1.00 pre-match odds
Streams
Valorant League PT
Maps/Stats
All Kills
First Kills
Op Kills
Eso177
EGN
silenttt
EGN
fainz
EGN
Dext
EGN
Phatt
EGN
Addicted
SAW
1
4
-3
2
2
+0
2
2
+0
4
1
+3
2
4
-2
tomaszy
SAW
6
1
+5
5
6
-1
2
4
-2
5
3
+2
5
5
+0
DaviH
SAW
5
1
+4
1
5
-4
6
2
+4
1
0
+1
2
2
+0
Bati
SAW
0
2
-2
5
1
+4
0
5
-5
2
3
-1
3
2
+1
Fizzy
SAW
5
3
+2
1
2
-1
3
1
+2
3
2
+1
4
4
+0
Eso177
EGN
silenttt
EGN
fainz
EGN
Dext
EGN
Phatt
EGN
Addicted
SAW
0
1
-1
1
0
+1
0
1
-1
tomaszy
SAW
3
0
+3
2
1
+1
1
2
-1
2
1
+1
1
1
+0
DaviH
SAW
0
1
-1
0
1
-1
Bati
SAW
0
1
-1
Fizzy
SAW
0
1
-1
Eso177
EGN
silenttt
EGN
fainz
EGN
Dext
EGN
Phatt
EGN
Addicted
SAW
0
1
-1
tomaszy
SAW
1
0
+1
1
2
-1
2
0
+2
DaviH
SAW
0
2
-2
Bati
SAW
0
1
-1
Fizzy
SAW
0
1
-1
2K 3K 4K 5K 1v1 1v2 1v3 1v4 1v5 ECON PL DE
Addicted
SAW
1
1
46
6
1
Bati
SAW
1
44
0
0
Fizzy
SAW
4
1
1
73
0
0
DaviH
SAW
2
1
1
80
2
1
tomaszy
SAW
5
2
62
0
0
Dext
EGN
2
40
1
0
Phatt
EGN
1
2
48
4
1
Eso177
EGN
1
1
35
0
0
silenttt
EGN
2
1
60
0
0
fainz
EGN
3
1
49
0
0
Eso177
EGN
silenttt
EGN
fainz
EGN
Dext
EGN
Phatt
EGN
Addicted
SAW
1
4
-3
2
2
+0
2
2
+0
4
1
+3
2
4
-2
tomaszy
SAW
6
1
+5
5
6
-1
2
4
-2
5
3
+2
5
5
+0
DaviH
SAW
5
1
+4
1
5
-4
6
2
+4
1
0
+1
2
2
+0
Bati
SAW
0
2
-2
5
1
+4
0
5
-5
2
3
-1
3
2
+1
Fizzy
SAW
5
3
+2
1
2
-1
3
1
+2
3
2
+1
4
4
+0
Eso177
EGN
silenttt
EGN
fainz
EGN
Dext
EGN
Phatt
EGN
Addicted
SAW
0
1
-1
1
0
+1
0
1
-1
tomaszy
SAW
3
0
+3
2
1
+1
1
2
-1
2
1
+1
1
1
+0
DaviH
SAW
0
1
-1
0
1
-1
Bati
SAW
0
1
-1
Fizzy
SAW
0
1
-1
Eso177
EGN
silenttt
EGN
fainz
EGN
Dext
EGN
Phatt
EGN
Addicted
SAW
0
1
-1
tomaszy
SAW
1
0
+1
1
2
-1
2
0
+2
DaviH
SAW
0
2
-2
Bati
SAW
0
1
-1
Fizzy
SAW
0
1
-1
2K 3K 4K 5K 1v1 1v2 1v3 1v4 1v5 ECON PL DE
Addicted
SAW
1
Round 8
silenttt
Eso177
1
Round 20
Dext
Phatt
fainz
46
6
1
Bati
SAW
1
Round 19
silenttt
Phatt
44
0
0
Fizzy
SAW
4
Round 8
Dext
Phatt
Round 10
Eso177
fainz
Round 15
Phatt
fainz
Round 18
Eso177
Dext
1
Round 12
fainz
silenttt
Eso177
1
Round 9
Phatt
silenttt
73
0
0
DaviH
SAW
2
Round 9
fainz
Eso177
Round 19
fainz
Eso177
1
Round 3
fainz
Eso177
Dext
silenttt
Phatt
1
Round 3
Phatt
Dext
silenttt
80
2
1
tomaszy
SAW
5
Round 4
Eso177
Dext
Round 7
Eso177
silenttt
Round 11
Eso177
Dext
Round 19
silenttt
Dext
Round 20
Eso177
silenttt
2
Round 17
silenttt
Eso177
Phatt
Round 21
Dext
fainz
Phatt
62
0
0
Dext
EGN
2
Round 5
Fizzy
Addicted
Round 18
tomaszy
Bati
40
1
0
Phatt
EGN
1
Round 2
tomaszy
Addicted
2
Round 13
Fizzy
Bati
DaviH
Round 19
Addicted
tomaszy
Fizzy
48
4
1
Eso177
EGN
1
Round 9
Bati
Addicted
1
Round 14
DaviH
Bati
Addicted
35
0
0
silenttt
EGN
2
Round 1
Fizzy
DaviH
Round 9
DaviH
Fizzy
silenttt
1
Round 4
Addicted
tomaszy
Bati
DaviH
60
0
0
fainz
EGN
3
Round 1
Bati
tomaszy
Round 5
DaviH
Bati
Round 16
tomaszy
Bati
1
Round 6
DaviH
Addicted
Fizzy
49
0
0
Head-to-head
No previous encounters
Past Matches
Comments:
Hide Pre-match
Threaded Linear
#1
informado
3
Frags
+

saw 1-0

#2
capital_d_colon
0
Frags
+

damn how is tomaszy rating so low>?

#3
FerahgoTheGreat
2
Frags
+

I would say that tomaszy's stats are pretty close to his rating. 1.11 is relatively normal for just a +4 K-D. Its a little lower than you would expect from the stats that you can see there, but it isn't absurd. Obviously his ACS is going to be huge because he took so many fights, but he lost fights a lot as well. A good number of his kills happened when his team had a significant man advantage as well.
It mainly looks weird because addicted is about the same as him. Addicted's rating is higher than normal because a whopping 8 of his 13 deaths came when his team had a big man advantage and those deaths didn't matter much.
Also assists matter a little bit, and tomaszy had 0.

#4
capital_d_colon
0
Frags
+

honestly fair enough.
rewatching the vod its actually pretty fair.
alot of his fds on atk were pretty sloppy resulting in 4v5s (his deaths were untradeable)
and a few fks being traded (round 18 for example)
hes a quite "snowball" type player. high mks
this was actually a great example of why acs doesnt always tell the full picture.

and it was a bit of a knee jerk reaction from me after seeing this:
https://twitter.com/valleague_pt/status/1619383547093225473?s=20

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment