0

Copenhagen will be EMEA domination

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
Shownu
  1. FNATIC
  2. GUILD
  3. FPX

This is the best ever representatives from EMEA for a Masters, even better than Gambit in 2021. Each team has a top IGL with insane fraggers and balanced team.

Liquid was always been flawed but still relevant due to fragging power, M3C hasn't been the same since the meta shifted with G2 fluking in stage 1 and Acend recently formed.

Optic will finally play teams that can match yay and punish the lucky timings from Marved.

#2
BIGGEST_VS_FAN
0
Frags
+

FPX > b0tild

#3
Styling911
1
Frags
+

Are you trying to be funny or what? didnt you just read my philosophy on masters2?

Fnatic: Global known chokers and will probably choke again
Guild: Not really champions material but probably top 6-8
FPX: 3 subs will not be able to perform (I dont see the reason to qualify if you cant play with main team?)

how is that best EU can offer? lmao no one can replace M3C only people that can win against international teams

#4
Shownu
0
Frags
+

Your philosophy needs brain which you do not have.

Fnatic made top 4 of Champs as the 4th seed from EMEA but they 'choked' according to dumbass Styling.

#5
tennisfan
0
Frags
+

Where is Fnatic's trophy?

#6
Shownu
-3
Frags
+

It begins with Copenhagen and it won't be a fluke like Optic facing against baby Zeta Divsion on their first ever lan.

#7
chimpy
4
Frags
+

Lol the two biggest baiters on vlr go h2h

#8
Shownu
-1
Frags
+

100T fans still exist? No playoffs just vibes.

#16
chimpy
0
Frags
+

yawn

#18
Shownu
0
Frags
+

Good, fall asleep till LCQ

#9
HSlime
0
Frags
+

I mean the FNC win isnt a bait but hes been hard baiting so much every optic thread hes going for the 1v200

#12
Styling911
0
Frags
+

fking ashamed of putting your name on one of VLR hall of fames

chimpy: snake

#13
Shownu
0
Frags
+

Don't care, never asked and also touch grass.

#14
chimpy
0
Frags
+

:(

#10
alitmanus
1
Frags
+

Optic dopped two series last masters, so I think they've already found those teams that can match them

#11
DELUSIONAL_POTTER_FAN
0
Frags
+

let's wait and see!

#15
chimpy
0
Frags
+

!

#17
jackb2016
0
Frags
+

I think the champs teams were better (minus fnatic who I was surprised even got top 8)

#19
373washoooi
0
Frags
+

ok

#20
Bosayyy
0
Frags
+

this was almost a great read until u said g2 fluke masters 1. brotha we'd be having an entirely diff conversation rn if g2 closed out the games against OGLU ACE FNC like they were supposed to. they'd be 4-1 sitting comfortably up top. all u had to do was research the games they lost and you wouldve seen they lost 13-11 map 3s against OGLU / ACE / FNC . as a fnc fan u shouldve seen what g2 was capable against T-1 of the world rn. yall shouldve lost that week 5 matchup and yet you call it a fluke. not to mention they went 13-9 // 13-10 against FPX as well.

#21
Bosayyy
0
Frags
+

as for masters 1.. they had to go up against liquid gambit fnc to reach seed 2 in the elimination bracket. that's not something to call as a fluke. esp winning the way they did against all 3.

#23
Shownu
0
Frags
+

They all peaked at the same time for once and got 2nd seed. Thats a fluke if you cannot be consistent.

#24
Bosayyy
0
Frags
+

vlr forum user for sure, what did i expect xD

#25
Bosayyy
0
Frags
+

all im saying is g2 has been playing super inconsistently in stage 2 and yet they take top teams to 13-11, 3 maps each. imagine if they were actually consistent ;)

#22
Shownu
1
Frags
+

Well I only believe in Ws and Ls. Did they get the W? No. If you cannot close out games then the team isint good enough simple. Also Fnatic were literally experimenting as Enzo said in the interview, they didn't take G2 serious and was just prepping strats and trying out new lineups.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment