2

Bigger Masters/ Champions Next Year

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
DDenied

What do you think the regional distribution of a bigger masters event should be:

24 teams:
3 EU
3 NA
2 CIS
2 TR
1 OCE
2 KR
2 JP
2 SEA
2 CH
2 BR
1 LATAM
1 SA
1 MENA

For champions take away 1 JP slot for APAC LCQ, 1 EU slot for EMEA LCQ, 1 NA slot for NA LCQ, 1 BR slot for South America LCQ and 1 CH spot for Master 3 winner

or 32 teams:
4 EU
5 NA
3 CIS
3 TR
1 OCE
4 KR
2 JP
3 SEA
2 CH
3 BR
2 LATAM
1 SA
1 MENA

For Champions take away 1 KR slot for APAC LCQ, take away 1 EU slot for EMEA LCQ, 1 NA slot for NA LCQ, 1 BR slot for South America LCQ and 1 SEA slot for Masters 3 winner

Thoughts?

edit: added slot changes for champions
edit: just to clarify CH is china and SA is south asia

#2
ShadowisBAD
1
Frags
+

i honestly think they shud make CIS and TR as actual regions and keep just keep EU normal

#3
JokesOver
3
Frags
+

imagine 32 teams with fifa world cup groups and knockout

#4
Noyn
1
Frags
+

More teams you have is better, the FIFA World Cup format is really cool

#5
DDenied
0
Frags
+
Noyn [#4]

More teams you have is better, the FIFA World Cup format is really cool

yer I also think it allows regions currently with only access to LCQ's to get involved more

#6
ChowChow
0
Frags
+

3 EU 2 CIS 2 TR is too much. By doing this you take down the quality of the teams so much. Low quality team = Low quality match. Become boring tournament and valorant will soon forgotten.

2 EU 1 CIS 1 TR is acceptable.

#7
Olofboost
-1
Frags
+
ChowChow [#6]

3 EU 2 CIS 2 TR is too much. By doing this you take down the quality of the teams so much. Low quality team = Low quality match. Become boring tournament and valorant will soon forgotten.

2 EU 1 CIS 1 TR is acceptable.

You acting like #1-2 SEA / JP teams are better than #5-7 EMEA teams

Funny

#8
DDenied
0
Frags
+
ChowChow [#6]

3 EU 2 CIS 2 TR is too much. By doing this you take down the quality of the teams so much. Low quality team = Low quality match. Become boring tournament and valorant will soon forgotten.

2 EU 1 CIS 1 TR is acceptable.

I feel like the top 3 EU can all take on everyone but Sen and whilst the 2nd TR and CIS teams will be weaker they will still be as good if not better than JP SEA and SA

#9
PrTsty
0
Frags
+
Olofboost [#7]

You acting like #1-2 SEA / JP teams are better than #5-7 EMEA teams

Funny

thats not the point here, u want to have enough representatives from each region but also not overdo it. since there is a big skill gap from top2 EMEA and the 7th from EMEA

#10
PrTsty
0
Frags
+

keep EMEA together, its more hype and probably better for the scene, give EMEA 5 and NA 5

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment