Intelligence is a trait that hasn't even begun to be characterized properly, as IQ as a metric has clearly been proven to be largely irrelevant in the accurate encapsulation of all the components of intelligence. The tests which are used to calculate these scores are even more uncertain, as most IQ tests have had to have been refined over the years. Even MORE uncertain is all the IQ scores you see attached to famous people online, as these are almost always calculated post-factum, or just straight up wrong, alluding to a lot of "alleged" IQs.
Her IQ is naturally much higher than the IQ of any person in the world. Or cognitive abilities, whatever you want to call it.
Even then, people like Hikaru Nakamura, who scored a 102 on the Mensa Online IQ test (however much weight you would give these online tests comparative to real ones is irrelevant to me, as i consider the very concept to be quite bogus, but it's from the official board, so to claim it isn't substantial is stupid), is literally the 10th ranked highest player in history. Most correlations made between IQ and chess skill have also be repeatedly debunked. This tangent is pointless.
Her IQ is naturally much higher than the IQ of any person in the world. Or cognitive abilities, whatever you want to call it.
This trait is attributed to Ashkenazi Jews, of which there are no explicit records that she was, so your tangent is not only irrelevant but outright incorrect.
I'm afking a lot, and your argument is straight up just leaking into the pretty exhaustive debate on the nature and innateness of intelligence, which i, quite frankly couldn't be bothered to discuss. Either go do something else, or read through and index my points properly before spawning a half-baked refute.
Discord