.
| Country: | Australia |
| Registered: | June 10, 2023 |
| Last post: | May 15, 2024 at 6:31 AM |
| Posts: | 6607 |
ok
barca is terrible lmfao
if T1 win then I take a shower
FPX 2-0 NO COPE
edg always finds a way
self promo?
ignore this message
it's a bait (not supposed to be taken literally and seriously) you bum
I see u have joined the dark side, bronzil
its not all flukes but rather the system and chemistry plays a massive role and not so much the individual skill of each player
definitely has nothing to do with the past fps experience in these regions.
if we keep treating apac and cn like this then we lose viewership and this will never fix the issue of both of them being bad at fps games.
I understand this is a bait but some people genuinely have this outlook
depends if benjy shows up or not.
also depends if boaster does shit like usual
prob for economic/viewership reasons. I don't think many people care about the actual concept of only european countries competeting to determine which one is the best. (I might be wrong idk)
no way bro is bumping his own thread after 2 minutes
no offence but why r u so hungry for online attention?
agreed but I think the viewers made it political and not eurovision themselves
why is every single concept somehow made political.
can't we just enjoy eurovision for what it is.
I understand u cant do this for everything but I don't see why u can't for eurovision
and?? how does this disprove para guys point (apart from title)
t1??
I don't understand what u could prove with asking me this?
rare bad game from life
"again
a human who lacks the ability of critical thinking and civilised discussing.
you dont even know what politics is man
how is discussing the impact of politics in eurovision
the same as having a political discussion/debate
political discussion: 2 parts disagreeing
discussing the politics influence: 2 parts discussing how it impacted
like ur so rude and u clearly lack the brains to back it up"
2nd and 3rd line: ad homenims.
4th and 5th: ur putting words in my mouth that I never said. I never said it was a political discussion/ debate but I rather just said that you are talking about politics (mentioning politics which does not mean having a discussion or debate about politics).
this sentence is not an argument in itself but is rather a question and ur using the false dilemma fallacy by suggesting that I said "the impact of politics in eurovision is the same as having a political discussion/debate" when I didn't and therefor I might not agree or disagree with that statement.
6th and 7th: not an argument nor ad hominem as ur just reiterating the parts of the previous discussion.
8th: ad hominem:
conc.
every single point u made was an ad hominem and so ur whole "argument" was only ad homonyms and no points that weren't attacking my character were addressed.
so if I just say this for example:
I disagree
I disagree
I disagree
I respectfully disagree
ur fucking stupid
ur braindead
u lack brain cells
OMG LOOK I USED 4 LINES OF ARGUMENT AND 3 LINES OF AD HOMINEM SO ACTUALLY I AM NOT BEING RUDE AND DISRESPECTFUL AS 4 > 3
im pretty sure if they win the gf then they are tied with sen on champ points
all ur doing is using ad hominem and not even discussing my point. If you are so smart and ur right then you could easily just respond with facts and a well structured argument.
If anything u responding with ONLY insults just shows the lack in your critical thinking and civilised discussion skills.
"we are just DISCUSSING the INFLUENCE of POLITICS in eurovision
and we are discussing concrete events? no opinions, no politics!!!!!!!!!"
r u stupid or just brainwashed??
you said we are discussing the influence of politics in eurovision then you say u aren't discussing politics.
the obvious contradiction is crazy
wow, very good criticism
they talking about tier 1 and franchising era
Discord