Keyd 2-1 X10
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.20 0.85 1.47 | 213 156 257 | 18 6 12 | / 11 6 5 / | 2 0 2 | +7 0 +7 | 81% 78% 83% | 143 99 177 | 24% 10% 37% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.17 0.96 1.33 | 206 155 246 | 14 6 8 | / 10 6 4 / | 14 9 5 | +4 0 +4 | 81% 78% 83% | 124 85 153 | 24% 13% 31% | 4 1 3 | 3 1 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.16 1.02 1.26 | 218 160 262 | 17 5 12 | / 13 5 8 / | 6 3 3 | +4 0 +4 | 81% 89% 75% | 126 101 145 | 26% 20% 30% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.11 1.33 0.95 | 235 293 192 | 17 9 8 | / 14 7 7 / | 4 1 3 | +3 +2 +1 | 67% 67% 67% | 147 173 128 | 29% 33% 24% | 4 3 1 | 2 0 2 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
1.09 0.89 1.24 | 169 155 181 | 12 5 7 | / 12 6 6 / | 10 3 7 | 0 -1 +1 | 86% 78% 92% | 116 120 113 | 7% 9% 6% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 0.64 1.87 | 222 147 324 | 17 6 11 | / 15 11 4 / | 2 2 0 | +2 -5 +7 | 76% 67% 89% | 146 110 193 | 22% 26% 18% | 3 2 1 | 4 4 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.98 1.13 0.78 | 184 232 120 | 13 9 4 | / 16 10 6 / | 7 3 4 | -3 -1 -2 | 52% 50% 56% | 124 155 82 | 25% 24% 27% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.93 0.75 1.16 | 184 158 220 | 14 8 6 | / 15 9 6 / | 8 5 3 | -1 -1 0 | 71% 58% 89% | 119 103 139 | 33% 36% 31% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.70 1.01 0.30 | 153 177 122 | 10 7 3 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 1 4 | -5 0 -5 | 71% 75% 67% | 128 151 98 | 15% 14% 16% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.47 0.16 0.88 | 101 51 169 | 6 2 4 | / 17 11 6 / | 11 5 6 | -11 -9 -2 | 57% 42% 78% | 72 39 117 | 17% 25% 14% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.30 1.12 1.20 | 221 235 208 | 36 19 17 | / 26 12 14 / | 8 4 4 | +10 +7 +3 | 76% 76% 75% | 134 135 134 | 26% 30% 23% | 7 5 2 | 5 1 4 | +2 +4 -2 | |
|
1.03 1.24 1.14 | 225 185 264 | 34 15 19 | / 27 12 15 / | 18 11 7 | +7 +3 +4 | 78% 81% 75% | 144 111 174 | 24% 20% 26% | 7 2 5 | 5 1 4 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.70 1.36 1.05 | 204 140 260 | 34 12 22 | / 30 15 15 / | 9 1 8 | +4 -3 +7 | 87% 86% 88% | 137 94 175 | 28% 21% 32% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.11 0.89 0.99 | 197 205 188 | 31 15 16 | / 29 12 17 / | 12 7 5 | +2 +3 -1 | 82% 90% 75% | 116 127 107 | 24% 22% 27% | 7 3 4 | 1 1 0 | +6 +2 +4 | |
|
1.02 0.81 0.91 | 180 222 146 | 29 17 12 | / 33 16 17 / | 16 7 9 | -4 +1 -5 | 80% 81% 79% | 117 146 90 | 20% 23% 17% | 6 4 2 | 3 1 2 | +3 +3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.97 1.59 1.26 | 263 227 312 | 41 18 23 | / 34 21 13 / | 10 7 3 | +7 -3 +10 | 80% 83% 76% | 179 174 184 | 23% 28% 19% | 8 6 2 | 6 4 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.19 1.22 1.20 | 212 194 237 | 35 20 15 | / 27 15 12 / | 17 10 7 | +8 +5 +3 | 78% 71% 86% | 148 136 162 | 27% 31% 24% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.03 0.69 0.87 | 181 206 152 | 29 19 10 | / 35 18 17 / | 11 7 4 | -6 +1 -7 | 60% 63% 57% | 115 138 90 | 30% 30% 30% | 2 2 0 | 4 1 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
1.05 0.37 0.73 | 161 217 99 | 24 17 7 | / 33 16 17 / | 8 4 4 | -9 +1 -10 | 71% 79% 62% | 120 161 73 | 18% 17% 18% | 2 2 0 | 7 2 5 | -5 0 -5 | |
|
0.43 0.70 0.55 | 112 76 154 | 16 7 9 | / 35 19 16 / | 22 14 8 | -19 -12 -7 | 58% 54% 62% | 83 62 106 | 19% 28% 15% | 2 0 2 | 7 4 3 | -5 -4 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.28 1.27 1.29 | 207 191 224 | 19 10 9 | / 12 5 7 / | 4 3 1 | +7 +5 +2 | 83% 83% 83% | 123 107 139 | 24% 26% 23% | 3 2 1 | 3 1 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.12 1.09 1.15 | 244 207 282 | 20 9 11 | / 17 6 11 / | 4 2 2 | +3 +3 0 | 75% 83% 67% | 162 130 194 | 23% 25% 22% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.92 0.59 1.24 | 195 129 262 | 16 6 10 | / 19 9 10 / | 7 1 6 | -3 -3 0 | 92% 92% 92% | 132 90 174 | 32% 43% 28% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.85 1.18 0.53 | 176 239 114 | 14 10 4 | / 16 7 9 / | 6 4 2 | -2 +3 -5 | 83% 92% 75% | 108 147 69 | 22% 23% 21% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.76 1.12 0.39 | 191 272 111 | 17 12 5 | / 21 10 11 / | 6 4 2 | -4 +2 -6 | 75% 83% 67% | 117 166 68 | 45% 38% 63% | 5 4 1 | 2 0 2 | +3 +4 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 1.62 1.27 | 240 230 251 | 21 12 9 | / 12 6 6 / | 9 5 4 | +9 +6 +3 | 83% 83% 83% | 173 168 179 | 22% 28% 17% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.34 1.30 1.38 | 304 306 303 | 24 12 12 | / 19 10 9 / | 8 5 3 | +5 +2 +3 | 83% 100% 67% | 208 238 177 | 25% 29% 20% | 5 4 1 | 2 0 2 | +3 +4 -1 | |
|
0.77 0.92 0.62 | 177 180 176 | 16 10 6 | / 19 8 11 / | 4 4 0 | -3 +2 -5 | 67% 75% 58% | 108 120 95 | 35% 38% 32% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.76 1.09 0.43 | 169 256 82 | 14 10 4 | / 18 9 9 / | 3 3 0 | -4 +1 -5 | 71% 83% 58% | 112 170 55 | 21% 21% 21% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.63 0.70 0.57 | 122 101 143 | 10 5 5 | / 18 8 10 / | 11 9 2 | -8 -3 -5 | 58% 67% 50% | 91 84 98 | 21% 29% 15% | 0 0 0 | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 |
Gambit won because nAts camped a bunch of rat angles and caught rotates. you think they dont know better second time around? Would honestly be surprised if Gambit makes it to Finals. They've been overhyped since way before Masters 3.
ALSO fwiw, if a team with more international experience was in Finals they would have won, NV was there because they knew Sentinels better than EU teams. 100T and SEN win that finals, no BM.
Holy shit you are coping hard, it's over for NA, no single team in NA has the same firepower as Gambit or Liquid. Redgar reyna diffed nv on their best map with 10 fbs, if a team's igl can play like that(fns/shaz/steel/vanity definitely can't), then there's no chance for NA trash to win. There's 1-2 good aimers per team in all NA representatives, Gambit and Liquid have 4 people per team who can aim diff on any given day.
had to google ur Russian boy btw
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I’m still under contract but GMT Esports allowed me to look at other options.<br>Read : <a href="https://t.co/ZVofsPkELN">https://t.co/ZVofsPkELN</a><br><br>🔁 appreciated . <a href="https://t.co/6vRppWnddy">https://t.co/6vRppWnddy</a></p>— GMT purp0 (@purp03) <a href="https://twitter.com/purp03/status/1441379342987190272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
benched btw xddddddddddddddd
No matter what happens...there is a lesson to be learned: RIOT SUCKS and needs to learn from Valve how to do stuff and fix things. Remember Olof's boost on Overpass? LDLC asked for a rematch and they got it. Fnatic didn't wanna play and LDLC got the victory! VK did not even got the chance to replay those rounds. RIOT filha da puta!
I freakin love cNed and Acend too but it's a really dumb decision by riot to send them in lower bracket. They can fine them or suspend them for some time after the tournament.
Yesterday's match was very close and vivk Keyd really played better than Acend to win. They deserve their win.
#****YouRiotGames
RIOT needs to learn from VALVE how to do things as they do at Majors. VALVE sucks at upgrading they game but they are very professional when it comes to stage tournaments and rules. RIOT sounds very generic and amateurs doing this kind of stuff. VK could enter the stage, pick a Brimstone, molly every teammate in the first round, pack their stuff and leave the stage against X10. And then spoile the role match and put RIOT at shame.
for "BR fans were talking shits about beating an actual org but then it comes out that they abused exploits"
wtf you mean. VK is not as good as acend. cNed and 4 plat bozos could beat that team.
Do better and make less excuses and maybe in 3 years a BR team could be an International contender.
PS: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
BR has more majors in any FPS then NA has in any game! Go back to minecraft kiddo! BR has two CS:GO majors in the pocket...what do you have? Some skins from betting? Excuses from jetlag? Adderall? Cheating scandalls? very nice! Enjoy Valorant until it's EZ for NA Scene. I will give you 2 years until NA Valorant comes to the point at NA CS is right now...a dead scene full of dead fish.
Idk abt you, but Brazil only obtained those majors when the game was in its infancy and after that they fell off, like can you name me a good Brazilian team in csgo rn, probably not and rn valorant is in its infancy and going back to my point being that BR can only do anything when the game is new, I'd say that their chances are pretty slim from going anywhere beyond group stages, like I'm talking worse than the SEA region.
I Change my opinion and thoughts. Vivo Keyd used a bug which was banned by riot and according to competiting ruling, players were not allowed to use any kind of bug in competitive play. There is no fault of Riot Games and Valorant because they posted these competitve rules way back long ( i.e. Before champions). Its players fault that they violated the competitive ruling so according to riot games, some action must be taken and they took.
For more info..... check this
https://valorantesports.com/news/competitive-ruling-vivo-keyd/
From VALORANT Esports on Twitter: Upon further deliberation, matches in Group A will be delayed to provide additional time to review the ruling against Vivo Keyd. Today’s matches will feature Team Vikings vs Gambit and Team Liquid vs Sentinels. Broadcast will begin 1 hour later than initially scheduled.
I wanted to see if it was with some team from Na or Emea what they would do... The Game was already 9x4 for Vivo Keyd when the player started using the camera because they don't restart the game for Keyd in 9x4 or 0x0 instead of give free rounds to Acend. You guys are a shame want to hand the cup to Emea and Na.
#justiceforkeyd
A CSGO minor would be much more well done than all of this and actually, everyday u can see how riot manages to bias over the popular regions in the tournament.. what a shame. This game is full of crap, sometimes is random, individual skill based and relies on pretty much duels instead on strats (like CS does which is beautiful to watch) you will see a lot of "underdogs" winning if they are out of their minds in terms of aim that day... u aint gonna see a team winning a major tournament twice in a row as u saw in CSGO with astralis, LG/SK, fnatic... sad to see this game going this way
I cant believe people say that FNS is a good IGL, his teammates are already out on site and he's outside the opposite one
⢰⣶⠶⢶⣶⣶⡶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⡶⠶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶
⠘⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠄⠄⠄⠈⠉⠄⠄⣹⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿
⠄⠤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡈⠙⠛⣿⣿⣿⣧⣀⠠⣤⣤⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⢠⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣭⣿⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣿⣿⠉⠉⠉⢉⣉⡉⠉⠉⠙⠛⠛
⢸⣿⡀⠄⠈⣹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣷⣾⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⢩⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⣠⣴⣿⣷⣭⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠸⠿⣿⣿⣿⠋⣴⡟⠋⠈⠻⠿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠃⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡁⠈⠉⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣤⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠄⠈⠻⠿⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣠⣄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⠉⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⠒⠒⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⢸⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⢿⣦⣄⣠⣄⠛⠟⠃⣀⣀⡀⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⢀⣰⣦⣼⣿⣿⡿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⠄⢰⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢛⣥⣾⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠈⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⣧⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
tbh this didnt feel like the envy i now
I am an eu andy but all jokes aside we really need the competiion between the regions and even considering the smaller becoming stronger such as brazil etc. they are still not at their full potential yet hope envy stay postive after the loss and dont start stagnating like sentinels