NIP vs KRU/Leviatan
NIP vs KRU 1-3
NIP vs Leviatan 3-2
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.31 1.34 1.27 | 216 240 177 | 15 9 6 | / 10 8 2 / | 8 6 2 | +5 +1 +4 | 84% 83% 86% | 146 160 121 | 32% 33% 29% | 3 3 0 | 3 2 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.25 0.85 1.94 | 268 224 344 | 18 9 9 | / 13 11 2 / | 3 2 1 | +5 -2 +7 | 79% 67% 100% | 172 140 225 | 26% 20% 33% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.24 1.05 1.57 | 201 209 187 | 14 9 5 | / 9 8 1 / | 6 4 2 | +5 +1 +4 | 74% 58% 100% | 138 141 133 | 15% 24% 7% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.21 0.89 1.75 | 263 216 344 | 16 8 8 | / 14 11 3 / | 10 10 0 | +2 -3 +5 | 74% 67% 86% | 146 124 184 | 33% 30% 35% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.07 0.66 1.76 | 183 115 302 | 13 5 8 | / 11 9 2 / | 6 4 2 | +2 -4 +6 | 74% 58% 100% | 121 60 226 | 20% 0% 27% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.06 0.47 1.40 | 239 153 289 | 14 3 11 | / 16 8 8 / | 7 2 5 | -2 -5 +3 | 68% 43% 83% | 152 113 176 | 22% 24% 21% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.96 0.56 1.19 | 223 159 261 | 14 3 11 | / 15 7 8 / | 1 0 1 | -1 -4 +3 | 74% 43% 92% | 137 106 155 | 23% 15% 29% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.90 0.14 1.34 | 173 86 225 | 12 1 11 | / 13 7 6 / | 3 0 3 | -1 -6 +5 | 63% 43% 75% | 121 71 150 | 23% 11% 27% | 3 1 2 | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.62 0.46 0.71 | 174 174 174 | 9 2 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 4 1 3 | -8 -5 -3 | 53% 29% 67% | 136 145 131 | 24% 23% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.56 0.04 0.88 | 119 62 154 | 8 1 7 | / 15 7 8 / | 10 0 10 | -7 -6 -1 | 53% 14% 75% | 67 42 82 | 24% 20% 25% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.01 1.55 1.24 | 268 246 298 | 60 29 31 | / 43 29 14 / | 10 6 4 | +17 0 +17 | 72% 65% 81% | 178 164 196 | 20% 17% 24% | 12 7 5 | 7 3 4 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
1.05 1.46 1.23 | 217 196 239 | 49 24 25 | / 35 24 11 / | 25 13 12 | +14 0 +14 | 83% 81% 85% | 138 133 146 | 29% 29% 29% | 4 4 0 | 3 2 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.10 1.26 1.17 | 235 224 245 | 50 28 22 | / 42 26 16 / | 24 14 10 | +8 +2 +6 | 78% 73% 85% | 144 144 144 | 23% 18% 29% | 6 3 3 | 2 1 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.85 1.36 1.06 | 191 157 240 | 43 21 22 | / 37 25 12 / | 23 10 13 | +6 -4 +10 | 78% 68% 93% | 122 98 156 | 21% 16% 25% | 3 1 2 | 5 4 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.83 1.22 0.99 | 185 167 224 | 41 22 19 | / 41 25 16 / | 23 11 12 | 0 -3 +3 | 80% 73% 89% | 128 115 145 | 23% 30% 18% | 8 3 5 | 14 9 5 | -6 -6 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.61 1.34 1.03 | 207 167 243 | 46 13 33 | / 50 27 23 / | 13 8 5 | -4 -14 +10 | 69% 67% 70% | 135 121 145 | 17% 14% 21% | 13 5 8 | 12 7 5 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.87 0.93 0.89 | 185 157 204 | 39 15 24 | / 50 21 29 / | 22 8 14 | -11 -6 -5 | 64% 59% 68% | 123 103 137 | 23% 21% 25% | 4 2 2 | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.69 1.02 0.88 | 159 144 169 | 37 13 24 | / 44 22 22 / | 21 6 15 | -7 -9 +2 | 70% 59% 78% | 99 92 103 | 27% 24% 29% | 5 1 4 | 6 2 4 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.60 0.96 0.81 | 183 178 190 | 38 15 23 | / 48 26 22 / | 5 2 3 | -10 -11 +1 | 69% 59% 76% | 118 116 120 | 21% 16% 26% | 4 1 3 | 6 3 3 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.57 0.90 0.76 | 177 164 197 | 38 13 25 | / 51 24 27 / | 13 4 9 | -13 -11 -2 | 58% 41% 70% | 120 114 125 | 30% 28% 31% | 5 3 2 | 5 1 4 | 0 +2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.61 1.14 2.43 | 246 178 363 | 18 8 10 | / 7 6 1 / | 10 3 7 | +11 +2 +9 | 84% 75% 100% | 151 132 184 | 31% 35% 27% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.19 0.74 1.97 | 199 145 293 | 14 6 8 | / 9 8 1 / | 5 3 2 | +5 -2 +7 | 84% 75% 100% | 129 106 169 | 25% 25% 25% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.13 0.97 1.39 | 267 271 260 | 18 10 8 | / 14 10 4 / | 2 1 1 | +4 0 +4 | 68% 58% 86% | 158 161 154 | 18% 17% 21% | 6 4 2 | 2 1 1 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.10 1.07 1.16 | 229 215 254 | 15 9 6 | / 12 8 4 / | 3 0 3 | +3 +1 +2 | 89% 83% 100% | 149 148 150 | 19% 21% 16% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.72 0.56 0.99 | 113 80 171 | 5 2 3 | / 12 8 4 / | 14 6 8 | -7 -6 -1 | 95% 92% 100% | 67 49 99 | 15% 33% 6% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.23 0.77 1.50 | 212 167 239 | 16 4 12 | / 13 7 6 / | 4 3 1 | +3 -3 +6 | 84% 86% 83% | 136 103 154 | 41% 30% 44% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.07 0.72 1.27 | 207 192 217 | 14 4 10 | / 14 7 7 / | 3 2 1 | 0 -3 +3 | 79% 71% 83% | 123 123 122 | 15% 13% 17% | 2 1 1 | 4 2 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.74 0.48 0.90 | 130 171 107 | 8 4 4 | / 11 7 4 / | 1 0 1 | -3 -3 0 | 68% 57% 75% | 84 111 69 | 34% 29% 40% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.70 0.31 0.93 | 134 126 140 | 9 2 7 | / 13 7 6 / | 1 0 1 | -4 -5 +1 | 53% 14% 75% | 91 82 97 | 25% 14% 31% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.45 0.02 0.78 | 145 24 217 | 7 0 7 | / 19 7 12 / | 8 1 7 | -12 -7 -5 | 58% 43% 67% | 113 24 165 | 32% 0% 35% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.32 1.21 1.43 | 268 244 294 | 24 10 14 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 3 2 | +8 +2 +6 | 69% 69% 69% | 196 189 203 | 17% 14% 20% | 3 2 1 | 3 1 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.19 1.33 1.05 | 212 238 186 | 19 11 8 | / 16 7 9 / | 11 4 7 | +3 +4 -1 | 73% 69% 77% | 139 159 119 | 19% 10% 38% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.00 0.86 1.14 | 240 209 273 | 22 11 11 | / 20 9 11 / | 3 1 2 | +2 +2 0 | 73% 69% 77% | 164 152 176 | 30% 34% 28% | 6 2 4 | 7 4 3 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.97 1.12 0.81 | 192 208 177 | 16 10 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 12 3 9 | -1 +2 -3 | 77% 69% 85% | 118 125 110 | 19% 15% 23% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.88 0.72 1.04 | 188 171 206 | 16 7 9 | / 18 10 8 / | 7 4 3 | -2 -3 +1 | 81% 85% 77% | 124 108 139 | 26% 20% 32% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 0.80 1.39 | 240 197 284 | 20 8 12 | / 23 13 10 / | 7 6 1 | -3 -5 +2 | 65% 77% 54% | 155 147 162 | 16% 15% 18% | 8 3 5 | 4 2 2 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.08 1.53 0.63 | 172 231 114 | 18 12 6 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 5 2 | +3 +6 -3 | 65% 77% 54% | 109 140 77 | 21% 21% 22% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.91 0.77 1.05 | 224 178 272 | 20 9 11 | / 21 10 11 / | 8 3 5 | -1 -1 0 | 65% 62% 69% | 130 114 147 | 41% 43% 38% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.85 1.01 0.70 | 147 177 118 | 13 8 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 7 3 4 | -3 0 -3 | 73% 69% 77% | 95 113 76 | 18% 22% 14% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.76 0.69 0.82 | 196 191 201 | 16 8 8 | / 22 12 10 / | 3 2 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 65% 69% 62% | 129 123 135 | 14% 9% 18% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 |
LATAM isnt that good imo just E-Xolos-LAZAR and KRU think NIP can beat one of those teams if they work on set plays and watch how they play
i never meant LATAM is bad just that in their scene alone they dont have many title contenders whereas places like EU and NA have a more developed scene so its easier for teams to get better i think LATAM teams are strong when they put in the work but it is much harder to be good in LATAM then NA and EU
I think you worded it different, if i am right you are saying Latam as a whole is not that good, so you should have stated the wide gap between Kru and the rest.
But since we are in the NiP vs Lev page and you said that i thought you were comparing it to BR which i think Latam has the upper hand.
But all good, i think we were just a little bit confused about each other comments.
PS: Sorry for the LATAM guy above being toxic towrds NA, we have some toxic people in the region.
The loudzetes are saying that NIP will lose easy to LATAM teams but probably haven't watched even 3 LAN or SUR games, only now in this final stage that is having competitiveness, the tactics used by LEV, EXL or KRU are not something different that has already been used here in Brazil and the individual level we have a slight advantage. LATAM has good teams but they are not superior to NIP, it will be a tight series with 5 maps, especially that NIP will only have 4 days to go to Mexico so of course the jetlag will affect them possibly lowering their level a little.
Eu sou LOUZETE e estou torcendo pra NiP. Antes de ter rivalidade entre time BR nos internacionais, a gente primeiro precisa formar uma base para poder levar vários times pra fora! Independente do time que for, antes de tudo eu sou BR. Quero um time BR lá fora representando bem! Isso é e-sports, não futebol de acéfalo!
Cala a boca aí tremboludo! Moleque mais tóxico e mais acéfalo comedor de bosta que já vi! Mamador de gringo pqp! Esse time da NIP é muito mais forte que esse time aí, esse é o mesmo time da Australs do ano passado que levou espanco da FURIA. LOUD somente está em outro patamar! Se não tá feliz, sai fora do Brasil, parça! Vá limpar banheiro de gringo lá na Europa/NA!
claro, KRU es tan superior y por eso el partido de LEV vs KRU fue muy cerrado XD. Te acepto que digas que KRU es mejor que LEV pero llevarlo al punto de decir "a cut above the rest" ni en pedo(pero si te refieres al resto del LATAM excluyendo a LEV, entonces estoy de acuerdo). El que si esta por encima de sus contricantes es LOUD, ningun equipo de BR le saco algun mapa y esta muy por encima del top 2 de BR.
NiP will destroy LEV like never seen before
Sad that KRU wont lose to a brazilian team now, 100% sure it will happen next time they face eachother. They look very very very weak (Brazil > LATAM in every single FPS game to date, its a shame for us to lose to any team from south america, only happened because its a new game)
xand's team (FURIA) destroyed LEV last time they played
https://www.vlr.gg/42187/australs-vs-furia-champions-tour-south-america-last-chance-qualifier-gf
13-2
13-5
13-6
It was literally a humiliation
Acend had many outside of the game problems, aside from that the only reason that you think Loud looks better than Kru is just hype, there is nothing wrong with that but it gets old with overhyped br teams every VCT.
Like for real, every VCT you guys think your top 1-2 will be a S tier team and will destroy everyone but they just disappoint every time.
Here is a comment you made 3 month ago where you overhype a BR team AND your argument is based on a past achievement lol.
https://www.vlr.gg/post/430955/vivo-keyd
Dude, Furia almost beat SEN, 3 closed games, imo they can be tier s too
Oq adianta a NIP passar aqui e passar vergonha fora? Falta muito ainda pro time encaixar.. a surra que eles tomaram da LOUD vai ser pequena perto da que eles podem tomar lá fora.. o time tem mira mas n tem cérebro.. por mim o jogo aqui fica com a LEV que tem pelo menos uma grande mente por trás do time e pode surpreender.
Their coach is sick, FLUYR is just replacing him, you probably already know that. Don't expect big changes in their agents picks, FLUYR and the players don't have time enough to change their playstyle. The reason they decide to play agents out of the meta in specific maps is clearly because they didn't have a good feedback playing with the meta agents on scrims, so i expect they will keep their comfort picks. Just look at Kru, Phoenix is clearly not the meta on Haven anymore, but Keznit choosed it because at the moment it's what works better for them.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
https://www.vlr.gg/7156/estral-esports-vs-dks-esports-first-strike-latin-america-south-finals-gf
Ganhou não
Fonte: confia
Well that was an interesting watch. Feel like lev core players have the skill to be world class latam players and might even be better than some of the kru players mechanics wise but holy they're trolling. Don't know if their mental broke after that game against kru or if they just decided to troll today nt ish.
——————————No SECOND SPOT?———————————
⠀⣞⢽⢪⢣⢣⢣⢫⡺⡵⣝⡮⣗⢷⢽⢽⢽⣮⡷⡽⣜⣜⢮⢺⣜⢷⢽⢝⡽⣝
⠸⡸⠜⠕⠕⠁⢁⢇⢏⢽⢺⣪⡳⡝⣎⣏⢯⢞⡿⣟⣷⣳⢯⡷⣽⢽⢯⣳⣫⠇
⠀⠀⢀⢀⢄⢬⢪⡪⡎⣆⡈⠚⠜⠕⠇⠗⠝⢕⢯⢫⣞⣯⣿⣻⡽⣏⢗⣗⠏⠀
⠀⠪⡪⡪⣪⢪⢺⢸⢢⢓⢆⢤⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢊⢞⡾⣿⡯⣏⢮⠷⠁⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠈⠊⠆⡃⠕⢕⢇⢇⢇⢇⢇⢏⢎⢎⢆⢄⠀⢑⣽⣿⢝⠲⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡿⠂⠠⠀⡇⢇⠕⢈⣀⠀⠁⠡⠣⡣⡫⣂⣿⠯⢪⠰⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⡦⡙⡂⢀⢤⢣⠣⡈⣾⡃⠠⠄⠀⡄⢱⣌⣶⢏⢊⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢝⡲⣜⡮⡏⢎⢌⢂⠙⠢⠐⢀⢘⢵⣽⣿⡿⠁⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠨⣺⡺⡕⡕⡱⡑⡆⡕⡅⡕⡜⡼⢽⡻⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣳⣫⣾⣵⣗⡵⡱⡡⢣⢑⢕⢜⢕⡝⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⡿⡽⡑⢌⠪⡢⡣⣣⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⡟⡾⣿⢿⢿⢵⣽⣾⣼⣘⢸⢸⣞⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠇⠡⠩⡫⢿⣝⡻⡮⣒⢽⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
——————————————————————————
How many majors in CS:GO does Korea have? How many Majors in R6 do they have? We have a lot and 3 BR teams on top world ranking in R6! How many majors do they have in CrossFire and Point Blank? They are just good at MOBA and StarCraft. I think they should be moved to APAC region to prove themselves better. I wanna see them against PaperRex and Thay Teams. To play just against Korean teams is EZ. I wanna see them facing KRU all the time, or LOUD, NA teams.
you should say tactical fps. Not first person shooter in general. Koreans are pretty good in shooting games too. But il give you that in shooter, brazil takes the edge and try not to bring other stuff in like "tiny country" it is irrelevant to whatever hes saying. Also if you check APAC LCQ all 3 korean teams came 3rd 4th and 5th respectively and the japanese team that was finalist included 2 koreans you get the point. Just ignore this guy he hates on any region that isnt korea and hes delusional half the times. Actually its funny that you bring up the tiny country because of the small population kroeans as a country have to play a game a lot in order to really dominate. I dont see it happening to valorant anytime soon but I think DRX and only drx out of korea can contend for maybe top 4 who knows.