Type 1 if you fucking hate it too
We might need a new thread for that since I ruined the chain before it even started
I think Riot need to revise their original plans for franchising. Because Tier 2 is unsustainable af
I don't, Franchising is great. Y'all just attribute every single problem the format has with Franchising, when in reality it has nothing to do with it. If your problem is Tier 2 for example, there is a thousand ways you can fix it that have nothing to do with Franchising
Yeah the whole system is just to give orgs stability and more reason to invest in the esport
What Franchising actually does is that we have long term rivalries and that instead of having to see your team play, idk V1 or Rise, you see them play 100T and C9. Every problem people usually cite when talking about it can be fixed in a franchising system
''we have long term rivalries'' but then riot destroyed its biggest chance at a generational rivalry
Destroyed everything pre franchising to start building again, this was the second year give it time
by that logic
PRX - EDG is not a rivalry
TLN - TS is not a rivalry
SEN - 100T is not a rivalry
PRX has clobbered EDG 95% of their matchups until recently.
TLN-TS irrelevant because they never make it to global events
SEN - 100t same story as PRX-100t. also one of the most manufactured "rivalries" ever. they get "placed" in the same matchups/bracket(excluding seeded brackets) every time.
Real rivalries form at the top, good example is Optic and Loud, where they meet only a couple times a year at masters/champs events.
legit destroyed one of the greatest rivalries in val history with optic and loud.
See, thank you, great way to prove my point. You’re mad at who got in, and you think that’s franchising’s fault when it has nothing to do with it. There could very much be a world where OPTC got in
brain dead take. franchising tradeoffs competitiveness for marketability.
you think that's franchising's fault when it has nothing to do with it
? do you even understand what you're writing?
I'm very aware of what I'm writing. Care to develop 1 disandvenatge of franchising? And I'll try to explain my point
ascended teams always at a disadvantage
system which encourages losing games
careers which last 2-3 years max
shitty formats
lack of events
1 Why are ascended teams at a disadvantage
2 I don't see how that's the case
3 Nothing to do with Franchising, how does franchising affect the length of a career. Also mf the game is 4 year old xD
4 Nothing to do with Franchising, you can have open events with shitty formats and franchise events with great formats
5 Nothing to do with Franchising, Riot can add as many tournaments as they like
Again, prime example of my point. You're literally attributing every single problem you can possibly think of about competitive Valorant and assuming it's franchisings fault. When you can have a franchising system that very well doesn't have any of those problems, and an open circuit that does
1.) a team ascends, has to fight tooth and nail to get to champs because then they drop into the ascension tournament. If they are eliminated due to being unlucky then they might have their players stolen because talented players don't want to waste one year in tier 2 instead of a year in tier 1, therefore making them weaker and forcing them to find weaker alternatives
2.) poor phrasing, it doesn't encourage you losing games, it doesn't punish you enough, e.g. mibr
3.) franchising does affect the length of the career cause the number of slots is limited, NA can only field 6-7 duelists MAX, anyone else is surplus, forcing anyone in the duelist slot to be in the hot seat and there is nowhere to fall back on
4.) I give this one to you
5.) it has to do with franchising because having more than 3 events + stages will force riot to increase their spending and they do not find it profitable
Without a sense of relegation or an urgency to fix your team before you get booted to t2, it allows stagnation.
Franchising leads to less new talent. with orgs being less willing to invest in t2 and t3, potential players are much less willing to go pro full time without the guarantee of a fixed salary/exposure from orgs. ofc there will still be new talent but much less. This lack of talent leads to the recycling of older, more experienced players leading to less spots for upcoming players.
precedent. look at how dead OWL's T2 scene is.
Let's see how many genuine rookies are being introduced to franchised teams 3 years from now (not including Asencion winners)
I like franchising, the only thing thats making it suck right now is rito not investing in the tier 2 scene as much
Valorant competitive season is a joke. Imagine playing 10 series in a whole year lmao
it's always the brazilians who talk shit about franchising as if any brazilian team other than LOUD wouldnt have bombed at any open circuit tournament lmao
ka ho-horo tōʻoku kau hhhhh
not too sure why bronzil even has 3 slots in Americas
they can't even produce enough talent to make two solid teams
Franchising sucks but it’s better financially which is a big factor for riot. Also better long term
Well that is blizzard tbf. League's franchising has existed for quite a bit and its ok at best
i think franchising is good its just that T2 doesn't have the support it should have rn but that isn't franchising's fault on its own
It has it's issues 100% I agree but outside of taking gambling money which riot refuses to do I don't think there's another way to make it sustainable. I like how it's not a complete franchising system and more of a 'partner' system, this also has cons but I like how it means the orgs don't get too much power
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I quite like franchising I just think riot needs to invest in tier 2 more