2-1 SMB
SUP
GLD
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.63 1.70 1.54 | 275 298 246 | 22 13 9 | / 10 7 3 / | 3 2 1 | +12 +6 +6 | 76% 75% 78% | 187 201 169 | 33% 29% 43% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.12 0.74 1.64 | 196 113 309 | 15 5 10 | / 12 8 4 / | 3 2 1 | +3 -3 +6 | 57% 42% 78% | 129 85 188 | 29% 18% 38% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.04 0.99 1.12 | 187 168 213 | 14 7 7 | / 13 9 4 / | 4 1 3 | +1 -2 +3 | 71% 58% 89% | 125 112 141 | 26% 35% 18% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.94 0.30 1.80 | 174 100 274 | 12 3 9 | / 13 10 3 / | 8 6 2 | -1 -7 +6 | 81% 75% 89% | 104 68 153 | 29% 25% 32% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.64 0.19 1.24 | 163 113 230 | 12 5 7 | / 16 12 4 / | 5 0 5 | -4 -7 +3 | 62% 50% 78% | 109 62 172 | 27% 29% 26% | 3 3 0 | 3 2 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.14 1.50 | 250 224 270 | 17 6 11 | / 14 8 6 / | 8 4 4 | +3 -2 +5 | 81% 67% 92% | 169 151 183 | 22% 26% 17% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.12 0.90 1.29 | 221 209 231 | 16 6 10 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 1 5 | +1 -2 +3 | 76% 44% 100% | 152 154 150 | 25% 44% 18% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.04 0.66 1.33 | 199 132 249 | 14 4 10 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 2 5 | 0 -4 +4 | 67% 44% 83% | 128 85 161 | 18% 33% 14% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.55 0.03 0.97 | 133 54 194 | 9 1 8 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 2 3 | -8 -8 0 | 62% 44% 75% | 77 40 105 | 15% 18% 14% | 3 0 3 | 5 3 2 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.51 0.03 0.93 | 88 38 127 | 8 1 7 | / 15 9 6 / | 6 1 5 | -7 -8 +1 | 52% 22% 75% | 53 27 73 | 8% 0% 10% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.12 1.05 1.09 | 244 249 244 | 64 34 30 | / 54 31 23 / | 18 10 8 | +10 +3 +7 | 72% 75% 68% | 167 166 167 | 32% 29% 36% | 8 2 6 | 14 9 5 | -6 -7 +1 | |
|
0.78 1.28 1.01 | 175 124 231 | 49 19 30 | / 49 29 20 / | 21 13 8 | 0 -10 +10 | 72% 60% 85% | 114 80 154 | 31% 27% 34% | 9 3 6 | 6 4 2 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
0.88 1.12 0.99 | 197 183 223 | 50 25 25 | / 52 30 22 / | 25 15 10 | -2 -5 +3 | 80% 78% 82% | 128 114 144 | 33% 35% 32% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.88 1.11 0.98 | 216 179 248 | 50 23 27 | / 55 30 25 / | 18 8 10 | -5 -7 +2 | 68% 63% 74% | 145 125 169 | 35% 31% 38% | 7 2 5 | 4 2 2 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.50 1.30 0.87 | 200 179 241 | 55 25 30 | / 55 41 14 / | 12 5 7 | 0 -16 +16 | 68% 60% 76% | 126 105 150 | 26% 31% 22% | 11 8 3 | 10 8 2 | +1 0 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.31 1.63 1.48 | 294 269 316 | 71 28 43 | / 50 26 24 / | 31 14 17 | +21 +2 +19 | 78% 76% 80% | 205 191 217 | 20% 22% 19% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.12 1.48 1.31 | 241 218 280 | 68 30 38 | / 48 26 22 / | 21 7 14 | +20 +4 +16 | 77% 65% 88% | 167 137 192 | 25% 31% 22% | 3 0 3 | 6 2 4 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.85 1.20 1.03 | 218 192 223 | 53 20 33 | / 52 27 25 / | 21 11 10 | +1 -7 +8 | 74% 56% 90% | 139 139 139 | 23% 28% 19% | 10 4 6 | 11 7 4 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.60 0.89 0.75 | 136 139 148 | 37 16 21 | / 56 30 26 / | 31 10 21 | -19 -14 -5 | 64% 53% 73% | 97 92 102 | 16% 15% 17% | 4 0 4 | 8 5 3 | -4 -5 +1 | |
|
0.32 0.79 0.57 | 151 137 165 | 36 14 22 | / 62 33 29 / | 13 5 8 | -26 -19 -7 | 62% 47% 75% | 92 86 96 | 17% 19% 15% | 16 7 9 | 12 8 4 | +4 -1 +5 |
SUP
GLD
SUP
GLD
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 0.74 1.60 | 247 228 267 | 30 13 17 | / 20 18 2 / | 4 3 1 | +10 -5 +15 | 78% 69% 88% | 145 136 153 | 29% 34% 21% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.00 1.00 0.99 | 226 241 212 | 23 12 11 | / 24 14 10 / | 10 7 3 | -1 -2 +1 | 78% 75% 81% | 149 155 144 | 37% 41% 33% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.98 0.71 1.25 | 258 195 323 | 29 11 18 | / 26 15 11 / | 8 3 5 | +3 -4 +7 | 72% 69% 75% | 172 126 218 | 33% 30% 35% | 3 0 3 | 8 5 3 | -5 -5 0 | |
|
0.92 0.52 1.33 | 162 97 229 | 20 6 14 | / 22 13 9 / | 8 5 3 | -2 -7 +5 | 75% 56% 94% | 109 69 150 | 40% 33% 44% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.75 0.64 0.85 | 177 141 214 | 18 7 11 | / 26 13 13 / | 7 2 5 | -8 -6 -2 | 66% 56% 75% | 130 106 154 | 34% 25% 43% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.44 1.18 1.70 | 295 265 326 | 29 12 17 | / 22 13 9 / | 15 6 9 | +7 -1 +8 | 72% 69% 75% | 214 201 227 | 20% 24% 16% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.40 1.14 1.66 | 310 268 354 | 36 17 19 | / 24 14 10 / | 7 2 5 | +12 +3 +9 | 78% 63% 94% | 210 177 244 | 32% 40% 27% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
1.03 0.80 1.26 | 189 177 201 | 22 10 12 | / 24 14 10 / | 11 2 9 | -2 -4 +2 | 69% 56% 81% | 116 103 128 | 23% 18% 27% | 3 0 3 | 2 2 0 | +1 -2 +3 | |
|
0.77 0.40 1.15 | 152 118 187 | 15 3 12 | / 23 14 9 / | 11 8 3 | -8 -11 +3 | 69% 44% 94% | 108 101 115 | 24% 14% 35% | 3 2 1 | 4 3 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.58 0.33 0.84 | 154 142 167 | 16 7 9 | / 27 16 11 / | 3 1 2 | -11 -9 -2 | 59% 44% 75% | 96 88 104 | 24% 29% 19% | 8 5 3 | 4 3 1 | +4 +2 +2 |
SUP
GLD
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 1.33 1.05 | 274 296 245 | 17 11 6 | / 17 9 8 / | 8 4 4 | 0 +2 -2 | 81% 92% 67% | 185 189 179 | 40% 45% 33% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.11 0.92 1.35 | 175 117 254 | 15 6 9 | / 14 7 7 / | 9 7 2 | +1 -1 +2 | 67% 67% 67% | 111 64 174 | 26% 12% 36% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.04 1.31 0.67 | 190 190 191 | 15 10 5 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 2 5 | 0 +4 -4 | 81% 83% 78% | 118 107 133 | 31% 33% 29% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.70 1.09 0.20 | 198 271 102 | 13 10 3 | / 18 9 9 / | 7 5 2 | -5 +1 -6 | 67% 83% 44% | 138 185 75 | 28% 28% 30% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.64 0.50 0.83 | 190 178 206 | 13 7 6 | / 19 11 8 / | 3 2 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 57% 58% 56% | 113 106 123 | 23% 26% 17% | 4 2 2 | 6 5 1 | -2 -3 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.68 1.71 1.65 | 336 321 349 | 25 10 15 | / 14 5 9 / | 8 4 4 | +11 +5 +6 | 86% 100% 75% | 227 212 238 | 20% 18% 21% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.45 1.55 1.38 | 214 215 214 | 18 9 9 | / 10 4 6 / | 7 3 4 | +8 +5 +3 | 86% 89% 83% | 139 119 153 | 21% 19% 23% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.35 1.59 1.16 | 282 309 263 | 22 11 11 | / 14 5 9 / | 4 2 2 | +8 +6 +2 | 81% 89% 75% | 174 192 160 | 19% 32% 13% | 4 0 4 | 4 2 2 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.58 0.61 0.56 | 166 210 134 | 11 6 5 | / 18 8 10 / | 5 2 3 | -7 -2 -5 | 67% 56% 75% | 100 130 78 | 12% 12% 13% | 5 2 3 | 3 2 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.56 0.82 0.37 | 130 173 99 | 7 5 2 | / 17 7 10 / | 14 7 7 | -10 -2 -8 | 67% 78% 58% | 113 137 96 | 12% 14% 11% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
yeah i will be seeing smb go out at the hands of GUILD once again in the LB. I will enjoy it too
Guild played like clowns in EMEA quals, no hate towards the players but just rewatch Guild Giants game, this is unacceptable if you wanna be a emea representative in major tournaments.
Just remember that guild has like 2 month without playing, that’s a lot of time in which they could’ve change and fix a lot of things, probably the come with a lot of good things prepared.
Hasosq deserves +frags. Lets get him back to postive frags , fellow vlr users
I hope Guild loses that, so someone can save Leo. He deserves a better team.
FF is acualy a good team but they get broken easly and keep throwing i personaly enjoyed watching them in Turkey's qualifiers but they are suck after that point they even lost to BBL
They just need to keep their shits together
lose a match to acend team and some people will think you are bad enough to lose to the guild
2-1 Guild if bonkar doesn't suck
2-0 for SMB otherwise
overall prediction: 2-0 smb
they seemed to be the best team out there online and then got rekt two times by acend and lost a map to prx in one week xd. Online: gods. Lan: average pro team
so please give example for lanner team. which team is lanner ? what do u think
first of all
there isnt a word called lanner ,
but if u mean a team better on lan than they are online
then sure
100T
u could say sen i wont cuz they didnt do well in berlin
lol they created 3 months ago they coachs (cigdemt) has resignation 1 months or 2 months now smb's new coach more powerful
its normal bcz their group was acend,smb,vision strikers and paper rex. they were not lucky like g2 dude.
Nah dude, G2 had SEN, and at that time they were considered the best team in the world, right now maybe not, but that doesn't change the fact that their group wasn't easy, and to be honest I don't think SMB could beat SEN
according to this comment sentinels are the worst LAN team because they lost 1 map to f4q (silly logic)
on an unrelated note. I still can't get over the fact that SMB went to berlin and only played 1 official vs team from another region and played Acend twice who they've probably also scrimmed a bazillion times. what a boring turn of events of them.
regardless of how they played, that's such a shitty draw haha.
if Bonkar gets some kills it's ezwin for Guild. Too bad that Bonkar's average kills is 9 per map
I really want Guild to win but 2-1 SMB.
Tho I think they'll meet again in lower bracket. Let's see
Guild cant even beat giants
Giants cant even beat oxg
Oxg cant even beat G2
G2 cant even beat SMB (not even close)
Conclusion: SMB is 4 tiers above Guild and Guild should be happy if they get few rounds.
Irrelevant but I'll always support Guild against anyone bar Liquid as long as they keep bonkar.
Someone who scrimed with guild said their icebox is crazy. SMB's icebox is good too. I hope it is going to be fun to watch
Change bonkar for pyth, maybe pyth or draken as igl, and u got swedish superteam
The guy got 53 adr AND 8% hs xd. Im sorry but even if his igl skills are insane, it just doesnt compensate
why they are not replacing bonkar? Guild is too op with him. give other teams a chance plz.
This is the SMB i wanted at Masters 3. They're just scary as hell when they're in this form.
no form just aim, if their aim isn’t good they just… lose. also smb onliners kekw ping abusers
How tf did Bonkar not have the largest +/- in the game... he's improving... hardest role in the game he does bad but when he played Sage he did good
https://www.vlr.gg/1715/bbl-esports-vs-bonk-allied-esports-odyssey-qual-2-gf
BBL won against Guild and SMB can't KEKW
tabi olum fred sag tik ustasi aslan allah aim lego best raze logicman takımın beyini muj kus anladin?
i swear if guild -bonkar, they could have went to berlin and could've won LCQ
Every time I see this it feels like the "-fifflaren" in csgo. Nobody knows whats going on in the team and how much they really do except the team itself. If I set you up with +20 kills each game, save you, bait for you, whos the best of you and me? And who see's what I do in a match when they highlight the kills only. Not many casters give the real credit either when slow-mo is rolling.
yea but his IGL ability - gunplay ability is a negative and its not worth it.
Maybe the rumours about internal drama in SMB were true after all for them to not even win against Guild anymore
very valid, I was just fking with ya. I just figured that out aiming your opponents will only take you so far. They def need to work on their tactics