0

emea vs na qualifying system

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
ritdro2211

i feel like the na system of open qualifiers for every event is better for the tier1 coz if a team struggles in 1st opens they have time to get experience and rectify mistakes and put up a fight in the next event while in emea if arent in good form during opens, u will mostly not qualify for vrls and that pretty much ends ur chances to reach next masters before even the start of groupstage of qualification to masters 1 which literally makes close to 6 months of nothingness and no tier2 tournaments to take part in either
only thing i would change in NA is have a big tier 2 tourney series during the groupstages for qualification to masters which would give you some vct points for top2 or give the top 2 a faceoff against the bottom 8 from groups in a knockout playoffs to give the finalists of the playoffs spots in the groupstage while other 6 spots are up for grabs in an open qualifiers similar to the present system

#2
cauhzi
0
Frags
+

just dont play bad LOL

#3
Omega_lul
0
Frags
+

They should have more slots for relegation except for that they EU system is better
because T2 teams get consistent practice in their region in a riot tournament so they also get awarded for it through the relegation system
In NA for eg Ghost farming Knights weekly b/w stages doesn’t award them any tournament benefit but In EU you have promotion tournament for it.

Also It’s impossible for a big org to miss a vrl since they are usually invited & it’s very easy to qualify if you are a mediocre team

#4
ritdro2211
0
Frags
+

you could easily not get into vrl if u r an upcoming team with potential that just formed and then that team can never get to go to any international event for a year eventhough they might have improved significantly after that
read my idea to make a better t2 system for na

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment