ez tbd
R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 0.23 1.80 | 288 56 424 | 18 1 17 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 2 3 | +4 -5 +9 | 74% 57% 83% | 171 32 252 | 54% 100% 51% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.66 0.90 0.52 | 153 223 114 | 10 6 4 | / 16 6 10 / | 2 0 2 | -6 0 -6 | 58% 57% 58% | 93 109 84 | 21% 25% 14% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.59 0.41 0.69 | 93 53 117 | 5 1 4 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 3 3 | -9 -5 -4 | 47% 43% 50% | 68 40 85 | 18% 0% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.56 0.79 0.43 | 139 143 138 | 11 4 7 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 2 1 | -4 -1 -3 | 74% 57% 83% | 94 88 98 | 57% 50% 62% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.53 0.70 0.43 | 158 157 159 | 11 4 7 | / 17 6 11 / | 2 1 1 | -6 -2 -4 | 47% 57% 42% | 94 74 106 | 32% 13% 45% | 2 1 1 | 6 1 5 | -4 0 -4 |
R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.55 1.57 1.51 | 298 335 237 | 22 15 7 | / 10 7 3 / | 2 2 0 | +12 +8 +4 | 79% 83% 71% | 186 194 174 | 27% 26% 28% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.49 1.52 1.44 | 269 245 310 | 19 12 7 | / 10 6 4 / | 2 1 1 | +9 +6 +3 | 74% 58% 100% | 172 153 204 | 31% 29% 32% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.34 1.23 1.51 | 229 208 267 | 15 9 6 | / 11 8 3 / | 6 4 2 | +4 +1 +3 | 74% 75% 71% | 136 118 166 | 24% 21% 27% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.04 0.96 1.18 | 159 144 186 | 10 5 5 | / 10 7 3 / | 8 7 1 | 0 -2 +2 | 84% 75% 100% | 98 95 103 | 27% 25% 30% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.84 0.69 1.08 | 172 168 179 | 10 6 4 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 2 2 | -4 -5 +1 | 63% 58% 71% | 112 103 128 | 17% 20% 9% | 3 2 1 | 4 3 1 | -1 -1 0 |
R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 1.34 1.08 | 207 218 207 | 48 17 31 | / 35 12 23 / | 20 11 9 | +13 +5 +8 | 79% 67% 86% | 136 136 136 | 38% 41% 36% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.13 0.65 1.40 | 230 115 299 | 41 6 35 | / 40 17 23 / | 19 9 10 | +1 -11 +12 | 72% 67% 75% | 155 84 196 | 29% 23% 31% | 9 2 7 | 6 4 2 | +3 -2 +5 | |
|
1.10 1.54 0.91 | 210 224 189 | 44 19 25 | / 38 12 26 / | 9 3 6 | +6 +7 -1 | 72% 67% 75% | 131 139 126 | 25% 30% 21% | 7 1 6 | 3 1 2 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
1.01 0.91 0.97 | 220 198 225 | 42 15 27 | / 41 14 27 / | 16 5 11 | +1 +1 0 | 72% 81% 67% | 148 132 157 | 22% 16% 25% | 11 4 7 | 7 1 6 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
0.97 1.22 0.98 | 179 161 187 | 36 13 23 | / 40 17 23 / | 15 7 8 | -4 -4 0 | 70% 62% 75% | 110 86 124 | 23% 16% 26% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 |
R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.05 1.18 0.80 | 233 272 191 | 51 35 16 | / 42 27 15 / | 7 7 0 | +9 +8 +1 | 67% 75% 52% | 156 168 135 | 20% 18% 27% | 4 3 1 | 11 6 5 | -7 -3 -4 | |
|
1.01 0.93 0.99 | 194 168 251 | 39 21 18 | / 41 27 14 / | 18 12 6 | -2 -6 +4 | 68% 61% 81% | 124 104 158 | 28% 23% 33% | 5 3 2 | 2 1 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.96 1.08 0.84 | 201 217 164 | 40 29 11 | / 39 25 14 / | 14 8 6 | +1 +4 -3 | 68% 75% 57% | 122 135 100 | 30% 35% 22% | 3 1 2 | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.91 0.84 0.95 | 221 219 248 | 43 25 18 | / 45 32 13 / | 9 6 3 | -2 -7 +5 | 70% 64% 81% | 146 137 162 | 21% 22% 21% | 8 4 4 | 13 12 1 | -5 -8 +3 | |
|
0.65 0.56 0.76 | 122 115 140 | 21 12 9 | / 44 30 14 / | 25 14 11 | -23 -18 -5 | 65% 58% 76% | 79 77 83 | 16% 20% 12% | 2 1 1 | 5 4 1 | -3 -3 0 |
R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.69 2.56 1.48 | 302 426 271 | 19 6 13 | / 6 0 6 / | 0 0 0 | +13 +6 +7 | 93% 100% 92% | 184 210 177 | 28% 33% 25% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.46 1.75 1.39 | 213 250 204 | 13 2 11 | / 6 1 5 / | 11 7 4 | +7 +1 +6 | 93% 100% 92% | 144 150 143 | 34% 44% 31% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.42 0.79 1.58 | 290 241 303 | 14 2 12 | / 9 3 6 / | 5 1 4 | +5 -1 +6 | 87% 100% 83% | 208 143 225 | 19% 6% 23% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.41 2.54 1.13 | 234 355 204 | 14 5 9 | / 7 0 7 / | 2 0 2 | +7 +5 +2 | 100% 100% 100% | 137 146 135 | 29% 27% 29% | 2 2 0 | 1 0 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.26 1.03 1.31 | 196 50 232 | 9 0 9 | / 7 1 6 / | 4 2 2 | +2 -1 +3 | 80% 100% 75% | 141 42 165 | 28% 33% 28% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 |
R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.62 0.73 0.19 | 125 138 76 | 7 6 1 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 4 0 | -7 -5 -2 | 53% 58% 33% | 64 71 37 | 19% 25% 0% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.62 0.64 0.55 | 212 212 217 | 10 8 2 | / 14 11 3 / | 3 3 0 | -4 -3 -1 | 60% 67% 33% | 134 139 117 | 38% 47% 23% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.61 0.68 0.34 | 191 206 135 | 8 7 1 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 3 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 67% 67% 67% | 120 128 87 | 25% 25% 25% | 1 1 0 | 4 4 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.51 0.69 0.01 | 138 172 5 | 7 7 0 | / 13 10 3 / | 2 2 0 | -6 -3 -3 | 53% 67% | 92 114 5 | 20% 21% 0% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.31 0.31 0.33 | 88 73 149 | 3 2 1 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 3 1 | -11 -9 -2 | 47% 42% 67% | 59 50 96 | 8% 18% 0% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 |
R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 1.47 1.43 | 268 257 278 | 24 11 13 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 2 4 | +10 +5 +5 | 74% 64% 83% | 165 163 166 | 32% 36% 29% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.06 1.24 0.91 | 212 213 212 | 17 9 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 9 3 6 | +2 +4 -2 | 83% 91% 75% | 152 166 139 | 22% 24% 21% | 6 2 4 | 1 0 1 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.94 1.16 0.73 | 175 170 180 | 15 7 8 | / 16 6 10 / | 7 3 4 | -1 +1 -2 | 70% 64% 75% | 128 139 118 | 27% 33% 21% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.92 0.70 1.12 | 210 178 240 | 17 7 10 | / 19 11 8 / | 7 4 3 | -2 -4 +2 | 70% 64% 75% | 127 99 152 | 21% 14% 26% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.90 0.71 1.08 | 206 170 240 | 14 5 9 | / 19 10 9 / | 10 5 5 | -5 -5 0 | 65% 64% 67% | 151 129 171 | 20% 16% 21% | 4 2 2 | 5 3 2 | -1 -1 0 |
R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.28 1.15 1.42 | 301 283 322 | 25 12 13 | / 17 10 7 / | 1 1 0 | +8 +2 +6 | 78% 67% 91% | 190 178 203 | 22% 21% 25% | 4 1 3 | 5 5 0 | -1 -4 +3 | |
|
1.09 1.29 0.88 | 263 310 213 | 22 13 9 | / 19 10 9 / | 3 3 0 | +3 +3 0 | 65% 75% 55% | 173 197 146 | 17% 13% 27% | 2 1 1 | 6 3 3 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.93 1.36 0.46 | 161 233 84 | 15 12 3 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 1 4 | +1 +6 -5 | 70% 83% 55% | 102 147 53 | 28% 34% 17% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.91 0.53 1.33 | 187 121 260 | 13 3 10 | / 17 10 7 / | 12 7 5 | -4 -7 +3 | 74% 67% 82% | 123 88 161 | 30% 18% 38% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.59 0.42 0.77 | 118 127 109 | 8 5 3 | / 20 12 8 / | 13 4 9 | -12 -7 -5 | 61% 58% 64% | 77 86 67 | 14% 16% 11% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
masterX [#13]Will ZETA gonna be EMEA's cryptonite?
ZETA its Spirit team from Dota2 they can take it
peanutchin [#12]If this is ZETA vs G2, Zeta is gonna send home 3 out of 3 EMEA teams
RIP EMEA slayers are denied the opportunity. Gonna be a banger match PRX vs ZETA
queueK [#35]Confirms an Asian team in the top 3 at the very least.
I'm contractually obliged to support PRX but I also have twice overdosed on the Zetium
PRX 1-1 Zeta (last map goes 50-50 and they draw)
lol
queueK [#35]Confirms an Asian team in the top 3 at the very least.
I'm contractually obliged to support PRX but I also have twice overdosed on the Zetium
PRX 1-1 Zeta (last map goes 50-50 and they draw)
I agree
mesayaloneramp [#79]EZ4ZETA tbh, Ten and Sugarzero have beated PRX last year
it was last year, now its 50-50
mesayaloneramp [#79]EZ4ZETA tbh, Ten and Sugarzero have beated PRX last year
there is no ez in valorant, literally everyteam can win
queueK [#35]Confirms an Asian team in the top 3 at the very least.
I'm contractually obliged to support PRX but I also have twice overdosed on the Zetium
PRX 1-1 Zeta (last map goes 50-50 and they draw)
couldn't agree more
sayson [#85]zeta 2-1
sugarz3ro and ten have beated them last year LCQ + playing with more stronger players
but PRX's playstyle might be hard for zeta
Last year f0rsaken wasnt on Jett so maybe this time it could be hard hope for the best tho
mesayaloneramp [#79]EZ4ZETA tbh, Ten and Sugarzero have beated PRX last year
yeah last year, wkwkwk dumb
sayson [#85]zeta 2-1
sugarz3ro and ten have beated them last year LCQ + playing with more stronger players
but PRX's playstyle might be hard for zeta
Paper rex were trying new things tho so lcq doesn't count
Tenkaii [#109]G2 > ZETA, PRX > G2
G2 = Paper
ZETA = Scissor
PRX = Rock
So this must be PRX 2-0
prx definitely paper
Tenkaii [#109]G2 > ZETA, PRX > G2
G2 = Paper
ZETA = Scissor
PRX = Rock
So this must be PRX 2-0
G2→DRX?
Scissor did lost against paper in your allegory
KillFeed [#92]Last year f0rsaken wasnt on Jett so maybe this time it could be hard hope for the best tho
is this when he played sova?
DELUSIONAL_SCOURGE_FAN [#108]how u believe in both opponents this makes no sense
maybe either will be the champion
Yawakadongla [#116]Ngl feels like this is more anticipated than upper final but for me Zeta 2-1 Paper Rex
For me its EZ 2 0 FOR PRX
SEA ALWAYS > JAPAN
Esports_Bettor [#125]Zeta won’t be able to handle PRXs hyper aggressive style.
2-0 PRX win.
which team do you think it's able to handle that controlled chaos style?
avepalto [#127]which team do you think it's able to handle that controlled chaos style?
Honestly, any team worth their salt who knows how to counter aggressive styles should be able to. I’m not sure which ones are, but I’m not entirely certain if zeta is able to.
fadezis [#128]zeta will win it all, not only this game
their playstyle the best one rn
also hairstyle
Esports_Bettor [#129]Honestly, any team worth their salt who knows how to counter aggressive styles should be able to. I’m not sure which ones are, but I’m not entirely certain if zeta is able to.
imo the only team i can see handling their chaotic style is DRX / APAC teams ( if they have the talents / aim necessary ) mostly because there's order inside that chaos, sweeping the opponent in chaos while PRX themselves are playing orderly / organized even tho it doesnt seem so. Also because their chaos / aggressiveness is different compare to any other aggressive team.
However ZETA are 1 of PRX scrim partners so that could play a huge factor.
Still on that PRX Hopium tho ;D
Tenkaii [#109]G2 > ZETA, PRX > G2
G2 = Paper
ZETA = Scissor
PRX = Rock
So this must be PRX 2-0
bro, G2 > ZETA > DRX > PRX > G2
masterX [#133]bro, G2 > ZETA > DRX > PRX > G2
this is why we don't solely rely with this kind of logic. Each team may be a kryptonite for other teams.
Esports_Bettor [#129]Honestly, any team worth their salt who knows how to counter aggressive styles should be able to. I’m not sure which ones are, but I’m not entirely certain if zeta is able to.
Any team that has a player who can reasonably pilot Astra can probably handle the aggression.
a_ll_a [#132]If laz play on YORU , zeta will win ez
every time i see his face i start to doubt my heterosexuality
Alovant [#131]imo the only team i can see handling their chaotic style is DRX / APAC teams ( if they have the talents / aim necessary ) mostly because there's order inside that chaos, sweeping the opponent in chaos while PRX themselves are playing orderly / organized even tho it doesnt seem so. Also because their chaos / aggressiveness is different compare to any other aggressive team.
However ZETA are 1 of PRX scrim partners so that could play a huge factor.
Still on that PRX Hopium tho ;D
Didn't aaron (mindfreak) said that they hated DRX because they played so slow, I'm pretty sure that manipulating the tempo of the game is PRX weakness (cancelling every agressive PRX attempt)
Tenkaii [#109]G2 > ZETA, PRX > G2
G2 = Paper
ZETA = Scissor
PRX = Rock
So this must be PRX 2-0
Unfortunately valorant doesn't work like that brother, anyone can win this match
D1X [#146]Who ever wins asia rocks
It's not about asia its about our region.So PRX FTW and they deserve to win
SoundGardeN [#164]Forsaken is indian..he had plastic surgery and moved to singapore. he is jacked as faaak.
funni indian jokes
SoundGardeN [#164]Forsaken is indian..he had plastic surgery and moved to singapore. he is jacked as faaak.
i know ure trolling but jason isnt lives in sg. just be smart. please. ure not even that funny bro.
KlobotXXL [#188]these pooper rex throwing that map hope they lost fckers rip my parley dog
You have a typical latam behavior. So undeveloped and uncivilized
KlobotXXL [#188]these pooper rex throwing that map hope they lost fckers rip my parley dog
cant believe valorant full of throw same as csgo
Dyinkz [#192]You have a typical latam behavior. So undeveloped and uncivilized
what makes me mad is they're not even fighting, like intentional throw.. just look at map 3 these dog gonna stomp this japanese
looklook [#210]zeta just has better aim than all these teams lol
Better comps, you don't pick reyna & cypher these days :D
rixy [#214]3 round pushing mid without any reason. i mean i know ure paper rex but what for?
I think so
SigmaMale [#207]SEA WHY SO QUIET?
LMAO atleast PRx reached further than the so called best asian team a.k.a DankRX. Talk about overrated.
KlobotXXL [#188]these pooper rex throwing that map hope they lost fckers rip my parley dog
dont bet if you dont have money indo
k1erre [#215]Better comps, you don't pick reyna & cypher these days :D
their haven with reyna and cypher worked really well until they got outaimed by zeta
SigmaMale [#207]SEA WHY SO QUIET?
this guy a sec ago typing "APAC WHY SO QUIET?" then realize jp part of apac
rixy [#214]3 round pushing mid without any reason. i mean i know ure paper rex but what for?
Yeah that cost them the match unfortunately
StormX [#229]Mindfreak check paypal
more like forsaken always push mid like retard and trading 1 for 1 , then lose map control
hangsow [#231]more like forsaken always push mid like retard and trading 1 for 1 , then lose map control
true forsaken was also over aggressive for no reason
rixy [#214]3 round pushing mid without any reason. i mean i know ure paper rex but what for?
they got $$$$
rixy [#214]3 round pushing mid without any reason. i mean i know ure paper rex but what for?
nah bro the reason is 3 guy in prx team always lost if 1 v 1
rixy [#228]this guy a sec ago typing "APAC WHY SO QUIET?" then realize jp part of apac
Japan isn't in APAC btw
hangsow [#231]more like forsaken always push mid like retard and trading 1 for 1 , then lose map control
agreed. dont mind if d4v4i and mindfreak bottom fragging, they played the role. but the push without the trades were kinda meh imo.
hangsow [#231]more like forsaken always push mid like retard and trading 1 for 1 , then lose map control
it's not f0rsaken or jingg fault, just check the 3 guys in prx always timing and lose if its 1 v 1
new roster
Lapindos [#242]it's not f0rsaken or jingg fault, just check the 3 guys in prx always timing and lose if its 1 v 1
new roster
look at round when scoreline 9-7 that mid push from forsaken cost the game by giving free map control for zeta
Lapindos [#237]nah bro the reason is 3 guy in prx team always lost if 1 v 1
they looks one step closer to closing the match before the mid dive.
Lapindos [#242]it's not f0rsaken or jingg fault, just check the 3 guys in prx always timing and lose if its 1 v 1
new roster
ure not realize how much the mid dive cost the match, i tell u that.
Lapindos [#242]it's not f0rsaken or jingg fault, just check the 3 guys in prx always timing and lose if its 1 v 1
new roster
and one more, its roster not roaster my indo fellow
StormX [#235]true forsaken was also over aggressive for no reason
to pressure the enemy team and halt their approach.
no1haterbutloveyou2 [#257]to pressure the enemy team and halt their approach.
and hows that work out for him?
StormX [#260]forsaken has to be the most overrated player so far in valorant
1 bad game = overrated
StormX [#260]forsaken has to be the most overrated player so far in valorant
That's the thing about aggressive players, they get shut down against good teams who knows how to handle aggression and their game styles.
StormX [#259]and hows that work out for him?
Bro you're talking in hindsight. It could have worked but it didn't, it is what it is. They reached top 4 playing like this.
actofmadness420 [#208]Forsaken just keeps advancing like a retard
He keeps advancing he reached top 4
UncleBrimstone [#252]lol. next time dont sleep in geo class
Why didnt zeta participate in APAC qualifiers then? APAC doesnt always include Japan
hangsow [#231]more like forsaken always push mid like retard and trading 1 for 1 , then lose map control
Hell no! he only started doing it from the round after PRX timeout, so was probably told to, and even then he always played safe and fall back after getting a pick. f0rsaken ended up 13/7 on defence a lot of impact kills so he really shouldnt be the one blamed.
tRONGOD [#266]That's the thing about aggressive players, they get shut down against good teams who knows how to handle aggression and their game styles.
u have a point.....wait for ur downvotes lol...ppl will not understand
NothingLikeMe [#274]u have a point.....wait for ur downvotes lol...ppl will not understand
nahh people in vlr realized that alr we're not dumb bro
Skyss [#261]damn mindfreak -23, bad day for him.. Always got timing and losing 1vs1 situation... Controller diff
and they blame forsaken lol, what will happen if forsaken in thai team
SigmaMale [#272]Why didnt zeta participate in APAC qualifiers then? APAC doesnt always include Japan
if they arent part of apac. they cant play in APAC LCQ last year. even zeta considered themself as apac on their tweet.
ur statement is unreasonable
rixy [#240]agreed. dont mind if d4v4i and mindfreak bottom fragging, they played the role. but the push without the trades were kinda meh imo.
meanwhile sugarz3ro with controller still topfrag
StormX [#260]forsaken has to be the most overrated player so far in valorant
How u said like that with that statistic of f0rsaken? PRX losing the match not always because of their duelist
StormX [#260]forsaken has to be the most overrated player so far in valorant
how can you say that when many pros are in awe of it
Lapindos [#276]and they blame forsaken lol, what will happen if forsaken in thai team
hes top 4 masters in prx, so glad hes signed with them