the team peaked when skuba joined, the one who did the most impactful clutches was skuba, the one who solved their role issues was skuba even tho sentinel wasnt his main role, how is brawk rookie of the year and not him? i like brawk dont get me wrong but he fits the "most improved player" more than rookie of the year
0
rookie of the year
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Think about it this way. If the team was Ethan mada s0m skuba and FNS (ignore role conflicts), the team would’ve been worse than it was when it was Ethan mada s0m brawk and FNS. The reason they were so much better is cuz FNS was gone, not necessarily cuz skuba > brawk
wow the team couldve been worse if brawk was out and they had no recon player who wouldve thought, the player who joined and solved all the role issues wasnt as impactful as i make him seem
thats literally something you cant do, cuz skuba wasnt only impactful because of shooting better than fns but because of how he single handedly solved the team´s role issues
skuba didn’t fix any role issues idek what ur talking about, they played the same roles
Should be mada. he was hard carrying this team when fraudjan maheta was on the team
for 1 vcl stage which lasted 1 month out of 4 years of his career playing controller
cuz he is that good not because of being experienced on the role like you wanted to make it seem
Lack of experience doesn't change the fact that he was already a senti player. He did not have to role swap to get into NRG's system
kaajak and its not even close. NRG were only relevant for one event. Unless its Americas only.
obviously but they are more so talking about within their respective regions
im talking about americas bro rookie of the year of vct americas award was given to brawk
bro is 25 years old
was a top 8 challengers NA pre-franchising
went toe-to-toe with prime SEN, played the guard, xset, 100t
played first strike
somehow is a rookie because "never played franchising before"
whatever i guess
Discord