How does that change the fact that the team just sucks ... they don't have one player and the team implodes? That was the main point of my post
Now you're just trying to save face. Are you sure you're not trying to change your main point now? You seem to have forgotten that the post is literally titled "XLG is shit regardless of YOU being there or not" and you did not show any disagreement to that. Instead, you say:
A spade is a spade. A team that loses one player and implodes, isn't a good team
Clearly you're aligning with the OP, and I think for anyone reading your comment (even in isolation) they'd interpret it that way - that the team isn't good in general BECAUSE it only took losing one player to implode. Especially because of the way you phrase it, and when the rest - more than half of your original comment - is a counterargument to the people who are at XLG's defence, such that XLG is still to blame and the fact they picked the sub disregards any other idea that they weren't at fault.
Also your original analogy doesn't even work - your statement after "A spade is a spade" is supposed to be far less ambiguous and isn't even a valid comparison to the obvious, as we've distinguished that there are many circumstances where it may not be true - such as this one for XLG, the language barrier being the biggest issue, but also for any team it highly depends on who you lose and when exactly, etc.
And here's your supposed main point now
Without YOU, they suck
Clearly it's changed. This point is such an obvious that has so little substance to it that there's no point in saying it.
and you slipped right by it (the main point) without even adressing ... they still fucking suck right now
Well if it's that they suck right now then why do I even have to address that? Clearly XLG sucked, I watched them too, and I think anyone can tell even just from the scoreline and stats. The emphasis isn't here, it's elsewhere.