dapr
M80
TSM
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.70 1.21 2.08 | 289 229 335 | 20 6 14 | / 11 7 4 / | 11 5 6 | +9 -1 +10 | 90% 78% 100% | 182 133 219 | 26% 24% 27% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.50 0.74 2.06 | 330 225 410 | 25 7 18 | / 13 8 5 / | 4 0 4 | +12 -1 +13 | 86% 78% 92% | 190 131 235 | 32% 24% 38% | 10 3 7 | 2 1 1 | +8 +2 +6 | |
|
1.27 1.45 1.14 | 212 251 183 | 18 9 9 | / 10 5 5 / | 6 2 4 | +8 +4 +4 | 90% 89% 92% | 138 164 119 | 41% 90% 21% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.09 0.76 1.34 | 135 79 178 | 10 2 8 | / 11 6 5 / | 14 4 10 | -1 -4 +3 | 81% 67% 92% | 94 60 120 | 46% 25% 56% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.02 1.09 0.96 | 180 174 185 | 13 5 8 | / 12 5 7 / | 5 3 2 | +1 0 +1 | 71% 56% 83% | 125 123 126 | 40% 46% 36% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 0.87 1.70 | 222 201 252 | 16 8 8 | / 16 12 4 / | 11 7 4 | 0 -4 +4 | 67% 67% 67% | 154 132 185 | 38% 35% 42% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.64 0.64 0.64 | 119 127 110 | 11 6 5 | / 16 10 6 / | 2 0 2 | -5 -4 -1 | 48% 42% 56% | 76 77 76 | 45% 36% 56% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.63 0.41 0.92 | 120 101 147 | 9 4 5 | / 15 11 4 / | 4 3 1 | -6 -7 +1 | 62% 50% 78% | 81 62 107 | 30% 23% 36% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.62 0.54 0.72 | 175 165 189 | 13 7 6 | / 19 12 7 / | 4 1 3 | -6 -5 -1 | 67% 50% 89% | 105 95 118 | 31% 39% 22% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.27 0.02 0.81 | 121 44 224 | 8 1 7 | / 20 12 8 / | 4 1 3 | -12 -11 -1 | 43% 17% 78% | 76 33 133 | 28% 30% 27% | 2 1 1 | 6 5 1 | -4 -4 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.72 1.86 1.81 | 312 317 305 | 39 13 26 | / 17 9 8 / | 18 5 13 | +22 +4 +18 | 86% 75% 92% | 186 185 187 | 29% 35% 27% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.77 1.81 1.46 | 286 215 333 | 39 9 30 | / 19 10 9 / | 7 2 5 | +20 -1 +21 | 89% 83% 92% | 172 125 196 | 22% 21% 23% | 14 4 10 | 2 1 1 | +12 +3 +9 | |
|
0.78 1.57 1.30 | 209 84 254 | 27 3 24 | / 19 8 11 / | 22 7 15 | +8 -5 +13 | 86% 67% 96% | 136 72 168 | 38% 20% 44% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.12 1.09 1.10 | 166 209 157 | 25 10 15 | / 16 8 8 / | 9 2 7 | +9 +2 +7 | 86% 75% 92% | 111 135 100 | 35% 83% 20% | 3 1 2 | 2 2 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.05 1.09 1.08 | 212 161 230 | 26 6 20 | / 21 7 14 / | 9 4 5 | +5 -1 +6 | 72% 58% 79% | 131 114 140 | 27% 47% 22% | 5 2 3 | 4 1 3 | +1 +1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.64 1.64 0.97 | 204 165 291 | 26 13 13 | / 31 24 7 / | 12 8 4 | -5 -11 +6 | 64% 63% 67% | 133 105 190 | 33% 30% 38% | 3 1 2 | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.57 0.70 | 178 186 162 | 21 15 6 | / 32 22 10 / | 9 3 6 | -11 -7 -4 | 64% 54% 83% | 116 120 109 | 35% 45% 21% | 1 0 1 | 6 3 3 | -5 -3 -2 | |
|
0.42 0.83 0.56 | 120 117 127 | 13 8 5 | / 29 23 6 / | 12 6 6 | -16 -15 -1 | 58% 50% 75% | 82 79 88 | 24% 21% 31% | 1 1 0 | 6 4 2 | -5 -3 -2 | |
|
0.49 0.66 0.55 | 126 118 139 | 17 10 7 | / 30 22 8 / | 3 1 2 | -13 -12 -1 | 44% 38% 58% | 82 78 90 | 45% 40% 54% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.12 1.00 0.36 | 122 65 236 | 15 4 11 | / 34 24 10 / | 5 1 4 | -19 -20 +1 | 39% 21% 75% | 80 48 145 | 26% 21% 30% | 2 1 1 | 9 8 1 | -7 -7 0 |
M80
TSM
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.97 3.28 1.64 | 335 580 274 | 19 7 12 | / 6 2 4 / | 7 0 7 | +13 +5 +8 | 80% 67% 83% | 192 339 155 | 35% 58% 26% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.60 0.82 1.79 | 283 100 330 | 17 1 16 | / 8 2 6 / | 8 3 5 | +9 -1 +10 | 93% 67% 100% | 195 107 217 | 33% 14% 38% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.42 0.85 1.56 | 242 183 257 | 14 2 12 | / 6 2 4 / | 3 2 1 | +8 0 +8 | 93% 100% 92% | 147 108 156 | 14% 13% 14% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.16 0.93 1.22 | 243 123 274 | 13 1 12 | / 9 2 7 / | 4 1 3 | +4 -1 +5 | 73% 67% 75% | 140 86 154 | 19% 50% 16% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.86 0.14 1.03 | 120 81 131 | 7 1 6 | / 6 3 3 / | 3 0 3 | +1 -2 +3 | 80% 33% 92% | 74 48 80 | 22% 50% 19% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.82 0.99 0.15 | 181 207 81 | 8 8 0 | / 13 10 3 / | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 | 60% 58% 67% | 133 146 81 | 42% 50% 17% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.62 0.42 1.45 | 185 130 408 | 10 5 5 | / 15 12 3 / | 1 1 0 | -5 -7 +2 | 60% 58% 67% | 103 78 206 | 27% 24% 31% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.49 0.22 1.56 | 122 85 273 | 7 3 4 | / 14 12 2 / | 1 0 1 | -7 -9 +2 | 33% 25% 67% | 86 63 178 | 23% 17% 38% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.46 0.44 0.54 | 119 133 65 | 4 4 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 8 3 5 | -10 -8 -2 | 53% 50% 67% | 83 96 32 | 18% 20% 0% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.43 0.35 0.74 | 132 109 223 | 6 4 2 | / 14 12 2 / | 1 1 0 | -8 -8 0 | 40% 33% 67% | 90 79 133 | 46% 44% 50% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
Would have said DZ vs OXG finals but since wedid isn't playing, 3-1 OXG vs M80. I think Rawkus is great but I think M80 is better, and potentially even MxS is better than DZ w/o wedid. But Rawkus could just be a god and prove me wrong
Crazy how new meta comps helped M80 make it to Finals. Just ban their Icebox and Lotus/Ascent. They seem to have a weak duelist.
I don't think they have a weak duelist, I think they are trying to play more team oriented like G2
Tsm and M80 are the 2 teams NA is sending?
Br might have a chance then lmao
Iโm pretty confident they can go blow for blow with NA, not much competition coming from latam tho considering two br rejects are enough to dominate your region
acting like aspas and heat had to go to the 2 latam teams bc loud, furia and mibr are dead last in vct :c
so I wouldn't rate the brasilian scene too high rn
im aware, and my point stands. If your VCT Americas teams have the best brasil has to offer and they are dead last, that doesn't speak well for the rest of teams in br. But we will see, I'm down to be proven wrong.
they are better than reta in every aspect
and sato is snw's dad
https://www.vlr.gg/170125/mixx-vs-smoke-troop-liga-gamers-club-s-rie-a-2023-finals-ubqf
Bo3โฆ.. whoever organises these events needs to pls explain the reasoning behind the decisions they make. Like why??
i would've liked to see a b05 lowers at least, but i don't necessarily mind a bo3 here since both teams are going to ascension (though 10k on the line is still big, but less important than ascension)
I think M80 will win this, however TSM is a team not to sleep on as they showed MXS that if you are not paying attention they can catch you by surprise. Betting on M80 to win.
I don't understand riot some regions have bo5s for these games
0 consistency
Does this match matter besides money & bragging rights? It doesnโt look like thereโs any seeding benefits
And thats what I've expected from TSM
Shame on Oxygen losing to these bots
We should be happy for NA that generational talent like skuba and verno can be freed from the depths of tier 2 valorant just a bit sooner. And that we will finally get to see players who actually deserve tier 1 making it (like koala, zander and nismo from m80)
TSM has done enough by beating the team of that fraud streamer. Imagine if that team got franchised. Hopefully by next year they completely exit Valorant.