looking like V1 v BBG, going to be one of the MUST WATCHES of this tournament.
completed
... 131 more matches
Thursday, April 8th
7:20 PM EDT
Patch 2.05
V1 ban Ascent; BBG ban Icebox; BBG pick Bind; V1 pick Haven; Split remains
Streams
VODs
Maps/Stats
All Kills
First Kills
Op Kills
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
9
11
-2
|
5
9
-4
|
10
7
+3
|
10
12
-2
|
7
5
+2
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
15
10
+5
|
16
7
+9
|
12
11
+1
|
16
12
+4
|
15
11
+4
|
|
vanity
V1
|
12
7
+5
|
5
12
-7
|
12
8
+4
|
10
11
-1
|
8
9
-1
|
|
penny
V1
|
11
13
-2
|
11
7
+4
|
12
10
+2
|
11
12
-1
|
9
8
+1
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
9
8
+1
|
12
8
+4
|
9
13
-4
|
12
9
+3
|
7
8
-1
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
1
2
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
3
-2
|
2
0
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
|
vanity
V1
|
4
0
+4
|
2
3
-1
|
5
1
+4
|
0
3
-3
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
2
1
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
0
2
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
6
1
+5
|
1
5
-4
|
4
0
+4
|
0
2
-2
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
7
|
3
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
1
|
2
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
9
|
1
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
13
|
7
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
68
|
1
|
1
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
9
|
3
|
2
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
1
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
12
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
52
|
8
|
1
|
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
8
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
0
|
0
|
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
11
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
5
|
2
|
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
8
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
51
|
14
|
0
|
|
Will
BBG
|
|
10
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
57
|
2
|
0
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
50
|
6
|
0
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
3
2
+1
|
1
4
-3
|
4
0
+4
|
4
8
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
5
4
+1
|
8
0
+8
|
1
6
-5
|
3
5
-2
|
7
3
+4
|
|
vanity
V1
|
5
2
+3
|
1
4
-3
|
5
3
+2
|
2
4
-2
|
1
4
-3
|
|
penny
V1
|
4
4
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
3
5
-2
|
3
1
+2
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
1
4
-3
|
2
3
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
6
4
+2
|
0
3
-3
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
vanity
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
2
1
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
2
Round 6
Critical Will
Round 15
bjor Will |
|
|
|
1
Round 6
Will |
|
|
|
|
37
|
0
|
0
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
4
Round 1
rarkar Poach
Round 3
Will Poach
Round 7
Will rarkar
Round 19
Poach Critical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
3
|
1
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
5
Round 7
bjor Poach
Round 8
Poach bjor
Round 10
Critical Poach Zellsis
Round 13
Critical Poach
Round 21
Poach bjor |
3
Round 12
bjor Critical Will
Round 14
Will bjor rarkar
Round 18
bjor Will Poach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
1
|
0
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
2
Round 6
bjor Poach
Round 15
rarkar Critical |
|
1
Round 17
Poach bjor rarkar Critical |
|
2
Round 8
Critical
Round 17
Critical |
|
|
|
|
65
|
0
|
1
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
1
Round 14
Poach Critical |
1
Round 3
rarkar bjor Critical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
2
|
0
|
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
2
Round 21
penny effys
Round 23
vanity PLAYER1 |
|
|
|
1
Round 1
effys |
|
|
|
|
46
|
0
|
0
|
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
5
Round 1
penny Zellsis
Round 5
PLAYER1 Zellsis
Round 9
Zellsis penny
Round 17
vanity Zellsis
Round 21
PLAYER1 vanity |
1
Round 2
penny vanity PLAYER1 |
|
|
1
Round 21
vanity |
|
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
1
|
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
1
Round 10
vanity effys |
|
1
Round 22
PLAYER1 vanity effys Zellsis |
|
|
|
1
Round 10
Zellsis vanity effys |
|
|
33
|
7
|
0
|
|
Will
BBG
|
|
6
Round 2
effys Zellsis
Round 5
effys vanity
Round 6
Zellsis effys
Round 16
penny effys
Round 18
vanity PLAYER1
Round 20
Zellsis penny |
3
Round 9
vanity effys PLAYER1
Round 12
PLAYER1 effys penny
Round 23
Zellsis penny effys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
1
|
0
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
4
Round 4
penny Zellsis
Round 8
Zellsis effys
Round 16
PLAYER1 vanity
Round 20
PLAYER1 vanity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
2
|
0
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
5
6
-1
|
4
2
+2
|
5
2
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
6
2
+4
|
4
3
+1
|
6
2
+4
|
8
5
+3
|
5
4
+1
|
|
vanity
V1
|
3
4
-1
|
1
3
-2
|
2
3
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
4
3
+1
|
|
penny
V1
|
1
5
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
4
5
-1
|
4
4
+0
|
2
4
-2
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
6
2
+4
|
7
2
+5
|
4
5
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
0
2
-2
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
4
0
+4
|
1
2
-1
|
|
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
3
Round 4
bjor Critical
Round 25
bjor Poach
Round 26
Critical bjor |
2
Round 7
bjor Critical rarkar
Round 10
rarkar Poach Critical |
1
Round 3
Will Poach rarkar bjor |
|
2
Round 5
Poach
Round 14
Critical |
|
|
|
|
50
|
1
|
1
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
5
Round 5
Will Critical
Round 11
bjor rarkar
Round 14
bjor Poach
Round 15
bjor rarkar
Round 16
Poach Critical |
1
Round 19
Poach rarkar Will effys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
2
|
0
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
5
Round 2
rarkar Poach
Round 11
Will Critical
Round 17
rarkar Will
Round 25
Will rarkar
Round 26
Poach Will |
1
Round 6
rarkar Will Poach |
2
Round 1
Poach Critical rarkar bjor
Round 23
bjor Poach Will Critical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
0
|
0
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
4
Round 5
bjor rarkar
Round 8
Critical bjor
Round 13
rarkar Poach
Round 15
Will Poach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
0
|
0
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
3
Round 7
Poach Will
Round 19
bjor Critical
Round 24
Will Poach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
6
|
0
|
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
1
Round 26
penny Zellsis |
1
Round 9
PLAYER1 Zellsis vanity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
0
|
0
|
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
4
Round 19
Zellsis penny
Round 20
Zellsis vanity
Round 21
PLAYER1 vanity
Round 23
penny PLAYER1 |
1
Round 17
PLAYER1 effys penny |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
1
|
1
|
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
4
Round 4
effys Zellsis
Round 5
Zellsis effys
Round 12
PLAYER1 Zellsis
Round 16
vanity Zellsis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
6
|
0
|
|
Will
BBG
|
|
4
Round 18
Zellsis vanity
Round 19
PLAYER1 vanity
Round 20
penny PLAYER1
Round 22
Zellsis penny |
|
|
|
|
1
Round 19
vanity effys |
|
|
|
59
|
1
|
0
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
4
Round 5
vanity penny
Round 6
vanity PLAYER1
Round 14
penny effys
Round 23
effys vanity |
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 23
Zellsis vanity effys |
|
|
54
|
1
|
0
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
1
3
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
1
5
-4
|
4
2
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
4
4
+0
|
4
4
+0
|
5
3
+2
|
5
2
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
|
vanity
V1
|
4
1
+3
|
3
5
-2
|
5
2
+3
|
5
3
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
|
penny
V1
|
6
4
+2
|
5
2
+3
|
5
2
+3
|
4
3
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
2
2
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
2
4
-2
|
3
1
+2
|
4
3
+1
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
2
Round 15
Poach  bjor
Round 20
Poach  rarkar |
1
Round 13
 Critical Will bjor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
1
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
1
Round 18
Poach Will |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
4
|
0
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
3
Round 3
Poach Critical
Round 9
Critical bjor
Round 14
Will bjor |
3
Round 6
bjor rarkar Poach
Round 10
rarkar bjor Will
Round 21
Will rarkar Critical |
|
|
|
1
Round 6
rarkar Poach |
|
|
|
61
|
0
|
1
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
3
Round 1
Poach rarkar
Round 6
Will Critical
Round 9
rarkar Will |
3
Round 4
bjor Critical Poach
Round 12
bjor Will Critical
Round 16
rarkar bjor Critical |
1
Round 17
Will Critical rarkar Poach |
|
|
1
Round 4
rarkar Poach |
|
|
|
77
|
0
|
0
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
8
Round 2
Critical rarkar
Round 3
bjor Will
Round 10
Poach Critical
Round 11
bjor Will
Round 14
Critical Poach
Round 15
rarkar Will
Round 19
rarkar Will
Round 21
bjor Poach |
|
|
|
1
Round 10
Critical |
1
Round 21
bjor Poach |
|
|
|
80
|
0
|
1
|
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
5
Round 8
Zellsis vanity
Round 10
PLAYER1 penny
Round 16
effys PLAYER1
Round 19
PLAYER1 vanity
Round 21
effys Zellsis |
1
Round 1
vanity Zellsis penny |
|
|
1
Round 1
penny |
|
|
|
|
53
|
0
|
0
|
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
2
Round 3
Zellsis effys
Round 19
Zellsis effys |
2
Round 4
vanity PLAYER1 Zellsis
Round 6
effys penny vanity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
4
|
0
|
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
3
Round 6
Zellsis PLAYER1
Round 7
Zellsis penny
Round 20
Zellsis vanity |
|
|
|
1
Round 16
vanity |
|
|
|
|
58
|
1
|
0
|
|
Will
BBG
|
|
|
1
Round 20
PLAYER1 effys Zellsis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
0
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
2
Round 10
Zellsis effys
Round 13
vanity effys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
3
|
0
|
Head-to-head
Past Matches
They won because they knew who their ro16 opponent was like 3 weeks before the match happened, because of seeding. They definitely anti-stratted, even though in all honesty there wasn't a lot of stratting from SEN. This is because SEN's only info on BBG is the games they recently played against them (no vods of BBG), so they were left with only breadcrumbs. But yeah, SEN's aim was awful, and the current iteration of their team relies pretty heavily on aim duels.
I mean yeah, cuz of the shit seeding you know who your opponent is 3 weeks ahead cuz you know your seeding doesn't change, it's #16, and you know SEN is gonna win masters so like all they gotta do is just study how to beat SEN with TenZ. Also, another big part is that SEN couldn't study BBG back because of lack of vods. Both ways, preparation diff.
While certainly , it was mostly preparation diff, it didn't help that almost all of SEN simultaneously had some of the worst individual and team gameplay we've seen in a while.TenZ not getting any kill with his bladestorm first map and just getting a single easy kill in the second map. Sick whiffing few times , along with being unable to hit good shots like he usually does. Dapr for some reason going not going through with his most basic aggressive lurks to try and win rounds. The team lacking in literal fundamentals (which hardly has to do with preparing for the other team) examples being them not setting up the easiest crossfire possible in A in haven despite having numbers advantage and then losing the round due to that. The poach 1v4 which shouldn't have been won at all , but was because Dapr peaked on his own and walked into poach's crosshair , then TenZ instead of double-peeking ,peeking on his own with a sheriff against a phantom especially on a day where he isn't hitting his shots. And then Shahzam trying to take the duel with Poach instead of waiting for Zombs' paranoia to run out and and staying deep in the angle instead of coming out of it and giving poach the fight he needed.
They also had some lucky moments such as in Haven where BBG had absolutely no info on who is C but had info that there's someone in garage in a particular round ,and despite after scouting that A is completely empty , still not hitting the site for... ? some weird reason , Zombs was in A but they missed scouting him , and dapr too , barely , but based on the info they had , they should have hit A , instead of going C , but they hit C anyway .
Another instance being shahzam for some reason staying so far away from Sick's ult instead of being close and protecting it , Rarkar got a free kill on Sick simply due to that , another elementary mistake which has nothing to do with preparing for another team.
BBG on the other hand had some of the best individual gameplay they've ever had as individuals and as a team. There are so many more instances of these kind.
The situation just aligned almost perfectly for BBG to win .
Yeah I agree, good reads are hard to do and sometimes it's luck which site you go to. Also, SEN was really bad, but it almost seemed as if they were not trying or saving strats like they've been historically memed to do. I don't actually think they were, but it looked sort of disorganized, and it's kind of on the IGL to sort of rally the troops and keep everyone's head in the game, but it looked like Shaz was off. Lack of effort really, too. If they had treated this game like it was masters finals, and gave 100%, the game definitely would've been closer. In this case, it's almost as if Shaz just said "yeah I don't really have a game plan for this team so let's just do our basic default", and then they lose a bunch of gunfights, and just mental boom and play afraid like it's solo queue.
Discord